SBS - The best value in QMS software

Part 145 Repair Station Rating and Capability List vs. ISO 9001 certificate Scope

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#11
Al - thank you so much. I was trying to make things more difficult than they are, as usual. :rolleyes: I see now - the OpSpecs is the document that "sums it up".

After following your link to the example - I started google searching for companies listed in the Repair Stations Directory advisory circular. Some of their websites have their certificates and OpSpecs and even their manuals - so I'm a little more enlightened.

Thanks for the nudge in the right direction. :agree:
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#12
You're right - It looks like there aren't many repair station folks who stop by.
 

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#13
Some of this I addressed in the other post that was started about capability list. This requirement about auditing the Capability list was "introduced" rolleyes-a1.gif since my involvement in FAA Repair Stations ended, but I had to periodically update our capability list. If you are the manufacturer of the parts, you might want to add an item at the Final Design Review or Design Transfer. That item might also include verifying that all the approved data is available for maintenance. As far (pun intended) as it's concerned, KISS.
 
Last edited:

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#14
Some things to keep in mind for a Limited Rating:
  1. If a part is not listed on your OP Spec, you cannot legally perform maintenance on it.
  2. To add it to your OP Spec, you must first add it to your Capability List.
  3. Submit your Capability List to the FAA.
  4. The FAA will revise your Op Specs after verifying you have met all the requirements (approved data, tools & equipment etc.) for maintaining the new part. This could be a facility visit (inspection). This is what I dealt with each time I made a change. The inspector visited with the revised OP Spec, verified we met all the requirements and swapped the new OP Specs for the old ones. (This wasn't difficult for us being the manufacturer.)
The reason I mention this is that it could take some time between you submit the change and the FAA issues you new OP Specs. They are not, exactly, able to turn on a dime. wink.gif See # 1 above. So plan ahead.
 
R

Raptorwild

#15
Cari, Here is the procedure for our Capability List included in our Repair Station Manual that has been accepted by our Administrator (FAA). I am also going to try to paste the Capability Verification Form.

"The capability list is a separate document from this manual and shall incorporate those items that comply with _________________, Limited Accessory Ratings. It is controlled by revision number and date. A current Capability List is maintained by the General Manager of this repair station.


The Capability List is available for review to all personnel of this repair station. During receiving/inspection, the receiving inspector shall refer to the capabilities list to verify that the article to be serviced is listed. The information is recorded on the Receiving Inspection Log. If the article is not on the list, the General Manager is notified immediately, the article is identified with a Rejected Parts Tag, (Form 6) and placed in the bond locker until further processing. Once the General Manager has verified and/or obtained that the Repair Station has all required tooling, documentation and experienced personnel to service the equipment, then that equipment shall be added to the capabilities list and work would be able to commence on that equipment. If the article cannot be added to the Capability List it is returned to the customer. A capabilities verification form (see Forms Section “C” GI-11) shall be completed to determine if a component can be added to the capabilities list.


The capabilities list shall be reviewed periodically in accordance with the internal audit programs schedule and not to extend a period of more than 90 days. If it is found at that time that the technical data and/or tooling is not current, and current technical data or tooling cannot be obtained, then that article's part number shall be removed from the capabilities list.

The General Manager shall be responsible for any revisions to the capabilities list and shall notify the appropriate personnel of the repair station and the FAA of such revisions. A revised capabilities list shall be sent to the FAA with a highlight sheet showing the revision number, revision date and what equipment was added or deleted from the previous list. The revised capabilities shall be sent to the FAA within 7 working days of the revision date by email, fax or hand delivered."


CAPABILITIES VERIFICATION FORM







Manufacturer: ______________ Part Number: _____________ Description: ______________






1. Does component fall within the scope of the repair stations' Operational specifications?




2. Does the repair station have the current technical data?




3. Does the repair station have the proper Equipment/tooling?



4. Does the repair station have the proper parts for OHC/repair?



5. Are the repair stations personnel trained for this component?





If items 1-5 above are all marked YES, then this component may be added to the capabilities list and the repair station may proceed with the overhaul and/or repair of this component.



Component was added to the capabilities list on: _______________________



If any one of the items 1-5 above is marked NO, then this component may not be added to the capabilities list and the repair station may not overhaul or repair the component.





APPROVED ______ NOT APPROVED _______



General Manager




This form shall be retained on file by the General Manager, for a period of not less than two years.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#16
Thanks Paula - big help!!

You've also inadvertently given me some help with an issue we have been discussing: how to separate the FAA repairs from our regular repairs back in receiving. We receive so many items for repair - and the usual practice is for the tear down guys to take pictures as received, log the item in and give it an eval #, then the item is moved to tear down where they...tear it down. These are the guys that clean all the components up and write up the initial observations like visibly obvious galling, broken balls, stripped threads, etc. Then the estimator comes out to give it the thorough inspection to determine if we can fix it or if it has to be remade.

We don't want our tear down guys doing anything to the FAA repair evaluation items - we want those set aside for the estimators. So, if we do like you guys do and have the capability list back in receiving...maybe with an attachment for a list of customers sending us FAA repairs in case we are sent an item not yet on our capability list...
 

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#17
I see that the regulations were re-written to allow maintenance to be performed before the ops specs are revised, as long as the article is within the scope of your ratings and you determine you have all of the housing, facilities, equipment, material, technical data, processes, and trained personnel in place to perform the work on the article as required by part 145 (ref:21cfr145.215)
I appologize for the misinformation in my previous post.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#18
Oh yeah, I forgot that I meant to post that, Al. I found that out from one of the potential customers our Mil/Aero Sales Rep is working with. The only thing it doesn't say is a specific timeframe for notification to the FAA.

Paula - is the 7 days in your procedure what your FAA Inspector asked for, or did you guys determine that and the FAA said "OK"?
 
R

Raptorwild

#19
Hi Cari,

Well in fact I just finished revising the RSM to state that we will notify the CHDO within 30 days of revisions made to give us a little break.

145.161(a) A certificated repair station must maintain and make available in a format acceptable to the FAA the following....
The Three Rosters are to be revised within 5 business days of the change in accordance with 145.161(b)

Our Administrator requires us to notify him in the manner we spell out in our Repair Station Manual.

So pretty much what ever works for the repair station!

Keep in mind, I am also the Chief Inspector for another Certificated Repair Station, pulling double duty these days. Not much time to post!:(
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
F When TSA stop to issue new Foreign FAA Part 145 Repair Station? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
J Part-145 Repair Station AS9100 Certification with Scope for Manufacture/Fabrication AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
C AS9100C Audit must include FAA Part 145 (FAA Repair Station)? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
P Currency of Technical Data - FAA Part 145 Repair Station EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
C Part 145 Repair Station Accountable Manager & QE appointments. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
M Currently implementing Part 145 repair work - CMM (Component Maintenance Manual) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
gard2372 Implementing Lean Flow in Customized Aviation Part 145 Repair Station Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
R FAA Part 145 Repair Station Postion Descriptions - Seeking Examples Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
C Separation of Facilities - Part 145 Repair Station AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 37
R FAA Part 145 Repair Station Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 18
C Part 145 Repair Station - Accountable Manager AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 15
S C of C release with accompanying EASA Form 1 for EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
S EASA Part 145 - The difference between non-certifying staff and Certifying staff Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 2
J MAG 6 and EASA Part-145 Issue 005. EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
M Transport Canada - EASA Part 145 (Bilateral) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
S Calibration and Verification requirement for foreign EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
T Part 145 Maintenance Station S/N ESN Character Requirements EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 3
M Can an organisation hold an EASA Part 145 approval WITHOUT a QMS EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 1
J Maintenance Man Hour Plan which satisfies EASA Part 145.A.30 (example needed) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
X EASA Part 145 / FAA Bilateral Agreement vs. Manufacturing under EASA Part 21 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 2
A EASA Certification Acceptance - The Russian equivalent of EASA Part 145 (Maintenance) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 2
C FAA Part 145/M Compliance Checklist EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
C EASA Part 145 Audit Programme example wanted EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 6
J Certifying Staff Training in a Part 21/145 organisation Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
R FAA Part 145 Vs. AS9110A Comparison and Differences Matrix Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 6
S How to determine what rating an article falls under - 14 CFR Part 145 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
P Cleaning of Seat Covers under EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 3
C Desktop Assessment Criteria for Part 145 Certification EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 3
B Requirements Summary - Part 21g / Part 21j and Part 145 and DAOS EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
A Maintenance of Aircraft Components - European Regulation Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
C FAA Part 145 Compliance Statement help Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 8
D FAA Drug Testing Requirements - FAR Part 145.211 (c)(1)(vi) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 8
A FAR Part 21/145 vs. EASA Part 21/145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 5
M Any News about the FAA 14CFR Part 121 / 145 Requiring Accredited Calibration? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
C FAR Part 145.161(a)(4) - Summary of Employment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
D Human Factors and FAR Part 145.163 'Training Program' Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 9
F Human Factors & Ergonomics - FAR Part 145.163 'Training Program' - Aviation Industry Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 20
A Complaint review as part of the complaint handling process? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D FDA Guidance on Computer Software Assurance versus 21 CFR Part 11 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
F Physical Part Measurement General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
S Clean room not part of my certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A MDR ANNEX XI part A or Part B EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J Part submission warrant for Level 1 PPAP APQP and PPAP 1
K How to handle GTINs for different configurations of one device with one part number? Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
A 60601-1 : Integrated Dry ECG Electrodes = 2 Patient connections inside 1 applied part? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
E Zero part to part variation - Gage R&R project Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 15
0 To which part of 13485 does this refer? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Separation of F-type applied part and remaining parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
V Part selection for R&R studies Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
S ISO 9001:2015 vs 21 CFR Part 211 matrix Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom