SBS - The best value in QMS software

Part 145 Repair Station Rating and Capability List vs. ISO 9001 certificate Scope

D

Don Palmer

#21
Hi Cari,

Looks like you've received a lot of good input here.

Cari Spears said:
For AS9100 our scope is going to be "OEM and aftermarket manufacture of ballscrews, ballnuts and assemblies."- or something to that effect - we are only making new screws, nuts and various components like flop over inserts and retaining tangs, etc. We don't supply assembled ballscrews to any of our current aerospace customers.

We are only going to be repairing ballscrews under our Repair Station certificate. So I think our rating should just say "Ballscrew Repair".
One question if I may ask it...Do you have SEPARATE facilities whereby you manufacture ballscrews exclusively in one facility, while repairing ballscrews in another?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#22
Hi Muleskinner -

Yes, I have received a lot of help here! In addition to the responses to my questions here at the cove, I have made friends with an FAA Inspector who has been most gracious in answering my endless emails!! It just occurred to me that I should probably have been sharing my questions and his responses with my friends here at the cove - I'll do that from now on.

In answer to your question (yes, you may certainly ask :bigwave: )- no. We have one building/facility. In addition to repairing or remanufacturing ballscrews (MRO), we are also an OEM supplier of various machine details that one might call "linear movement actuators" - ballscrew assemblies being one type - we also provide various machining, grinding and thread grinding that we like to call our "backdoor work".
 
D

Don Palmer

#23
Ah, a gracious FAA Inspector...

Cari Spears said:
I have made friends with an FAA Inspector who has been most gracious in answering my endless emails!! It just occurred to me that I should probably have been sharing my questions and his responses with my friends here at the cove - I'll do that from now on.
Yes, it's important to have a good rapport with your PMI, and anything you can share regarding your experiences is much appreciated.
 
B

Blue Tuna

#24
AS9100 certs

About the first post here, there is a world of difference when you opt to list only as "repair of ball screws" vs. "manufacturing and repair", you will eliminate the enitre design section in 7.3. If at a later date you want to add the function of "manufacturing" in, this can be accomplished through one of the annual surveillance audits.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#25
Cari Spears said:
For ISO our scope is "New and reconditioning of ballscrews, acme lead screws, spindles and related machine components."

For AS9100 our scope is going to be "OEM and aftermarket manufacture of ballscrews, ballnuts and assemblies."- or something to that effect - we are only making new screws, nuts and various components like flop over inserts and retaining tangs, etc.

We are only going to be repairing ballscrews under our Repair Station certificate. So I think our rating should just say "Ballscrew Repair". :confused:
Hi Blue Tuna - I'm not sure what you're saying in your post above. We manufacture new only for aerospace customers. We are getting our part 145 repair station certificate to cover repair and maintenance. We may at some point also apply for part 21 - but our customers are asking for AS9100.
 
D

Don Palmer

#26
Cari Spears said:
I'm not sure what you're saying in your post above. We manufacture new only for aerospace customers. We are getting our part 145 repair station certificate to cover repair and maintenance. We may at some point also apply for part 21 - but our customers are asking for AS9100.
As a manufacturer of NEW PARTS for aerospace customers, are you currently doing so as a subcontractor?
 
B

Blue Tuna

#27
clarification

No doubt it is difficult to follow my rambling. AS9100 is a manufacturing standard, the AS9110 is a maintenance standard (which no one has the capability to certificate yet). However, many maintenance organizations (FAA Part 145 Repair Stations) opt for the AS9100 with the design function of 7.3 removed. If you are not going to manufacture under the AS9100 then your work in writing to the standard is much easier. For example the entire design section is moot as is First Article etc.....

With that said, if you are manufacturing parts for aerospace it may be to your advantage and include the manufacturing element.

If you opt for maintenance only, then there will probably be a time in the near future when you can "upgrade" to the AS9110 (when certification becomes available). The only problem here is the additional elements for 9110 over 9100.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#28
Blue Tuna said:
AS9100 is a manufacturing standard, the AS9110 is a maintenance standard (which no one has the capability to certificate yet).
With that said, if you are manufacturing parts for aerospace it may be to your advantage and include the manufacturing element.

If you opt for maintenance only, then there will probably be a time in the near future when you can "upgrade" to the AS9110 (when certification becomes available). The only problem here is the additional elements for 9110 over 9100.
WE MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS FOR THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY - SO WE ARE GOING TO BE AS9100 REGISTERED.

We also repair and manufacture new for at least a dozen different industries from machine tool to medical equipment to sporting goods.

We are also going to get Part 145 Repair Station certificated in order to repair and maintain ballscrews for commercial aircraft.

We are not opting for maintenance only; I'm not sure how you got that from what I'm saying.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#29
Muleskinner said:
As a manufacturer of NEW PARTS for aerospace customers, are you currently doing so as a subcontractor?
Yes. Our customer has the contract for a landing gear assembly or a brake actuating system, for example, that has 2 or 3 ballscrews in it. We are subcontracted for the ballscrews.

It's the same tier(s) as our non-aerospace OEM work. One of the B3 contracts our customer to build a dozen of this machining center. Our customer subcontracts the ballscrews, spindles, etc. to us.

Sometimes we're tier 2, sometimes tier 3.
 
D

Don Palmer

#30
FAR Part 21

Cari Spears said:
WE MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS FOR THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY - SO WE ARE GOING TO BE AS9100 REGISTERED.

We also repair and manufacture new for at least a dozen different industries from machine tool to medical equipment to sporting goods.

We are also going to get Part 145 Repair Station certificated in order to repair and maintain ballscrews for commercial aircraft.

We are not opting for maintenance only; I'm not sure how you got that from what I'm saying.
Hi Cari,

Hope you are not getting frustrated with us. We are trying to understand your situation. I feel confident you are moving forward. Your posts do indicate that in a positive mode. We are here to learn from others as well as help when we can.

I am just so curious as to HOW your organization can, as you say, "MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS FOR THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY", without having Part 21 certification from the very beginning. Can you in fact manufacture aircraft parts as O.E.M., and sell these parts to your aerospace customers without FIRST having Part 21 certification. WHO determines Airworthiness?

Best regards! :)
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
F When TSA stop to issue new Foreign FAA Part 145 Repair Station? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
J Part-145 Repair Station AS9100 Certification with Scope for Manufacture/Fabrication AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
C AS9100C Audit must include FAA Part 145 (FAA Repair Station)? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
P Currency of Technical Data - FAA Part 145 Repair Station EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
C Part 145 Repair Station Accountable Manager & QE appointments. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
M Currently implementing Part 145 repair work - CMM (Component Maintenance Manual) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
gard2372 Implementing Lean Flow in Customized Aviation Part 145 Repair Station Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
R FAA Part 145 Repair Station Postion Descriptions - Seeking Examples Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
C Separation of Facilities - Part 145 Repair Station AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 37
R FAA Part 145 Repair Station Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 18
C Part 145 Repair Station - Accountable Manager AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 15
S C of C release with accompanying EASA Form 1 for EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
S EASA Part 145 - The difference between non-certifying staff and Certifying staff Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 2
J MAG 6 and EASA Part-145 Issue 005. EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
M Transport Canada - EASA Part 145 (Bilateral) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
S Calibration and Verification requirement for foreign EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
T Part 145 Maintenance Station S/N ESN Character Requirements EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 3
M Can an organisation hold an EASA Part 145 approval WITHOUT a QMS EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 1
J Maintenance Man Hour Plan which satisfies EASA Part 145.A.30 (example needed) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
X EASA Part 145 / FAA Bilateral Agreement vs. Manufacturing under EASA Part 21 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 2
A EASA Certification Acceptance - The Russian equivalent of EASA Part 145 (Maintenance) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 2
C FAA Part 145/M Compliance Checklist EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
C EASA Part 145 Audit Programme example wanted EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 6
J Certifying Staff Training in a Part 21/145 organisation Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
R FAA Part 145 Vs. AS9110A Comparison and Differences Matrix Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 6
S How to determine what rating an article falls under - 14 CFR Part 145 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
P Cleaning of Seat Covers under EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 3
C Desktop Assessment Criteria for Part 145 Certification EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 3
B Requirements Summary - Part 21g / Part 21j and Part 145 and DAOS EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
A Maintenance of Aircraft Components - European Regulation Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
C FAA Part 145 Compliance Statement help Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 8
D FAA Drug Testing Requirements - FAR Part 145.211 (c)(1)(vi) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 8
A FAR Part 21/145 vs. EASA Part 21/145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 5
M Any News about the FAA 14CFR Part 121 / 145 Requiring Accredited Calibration? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 3
C FAR Part 145.161(a)(4) - Summary of Employment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
D Human Factors and FAR Part 145.163 'Training Program' Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 9
F Human Factors & Ergonomics - FAR Part 145.163 'Training Program' - Aviation Industry Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 20
A Complaint review as part of the complaint handling process? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D FDA Guidance on Computer Software Assurance versus 21 CFR Part 11 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
F Physical Part Measurement General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
S Clean room not part of my certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A MDR ANNEX XI part A or Part B EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J Part submission warrant for Level 1 PPAP APQP and PPAP 1
K How to handle GTINs for different configurations of one device with one part number? Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
A 60601-1 : Integrated Dry ECG Electrodes = 2 Patient connections inside 1 applied part? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
E Zero part to part variation - Gage R&R project Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 15
0 To which part of 13485 does this refer? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Separation of F-type applied part and remaining parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
V Part selection for R&R studies Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
S ISO 9001:2015 vs 21 CFR Part 211 matrix Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom