Parts included/not included in ECO/ECN

R

ramack

#1
I'm new to this forum, came across it while looking for ECO/ECN info. I've started a new job about 3 months ago. One of the things that I'm in charge of is ECOs. This is a pretty small company that is fairly new and document control is pretty poor which has caused a gamut of issues. There is a PLM package that is being used, but it's really more for Sales, Work Orders/Pick Lists and inventory management. It does have an ECO/ECN module, which is pretty basic, but better than nothing.

So, with that background, a discussion arose about what I'm including in the ECO. In a nutshell, say I have an Assembly A. In that assembly, there is a Part B. There is also a Part C that is not part of the BOM and assembly. I'm substituting Part B with Part C and I've started an ECO for this change. So my question is this. What should be included in the ECO? I am including and "tagging" all three (in this very generic situation), the Assembly A, Part B and Part C because all three are involved "in" the change, but only Assembly A is actually being changed. My "superior" , who is also one of the biz owners view is that only the Assembly A should be included and only note the substitution of Part B with Part C.

By "tagging" Parts B and C as being part of the ECO, they will have that ECO history with this change and future changes if there are any. By not specifically including them into the ECO, any linking to this or other ECOs will not be retained.

So I guess in short the question is what becomes included in the ECO/ECN, the assembly that is being directly being changed or all items, parts and assemblies that are involved in the change?

Just curious what the views are from those that have been involved with ECO. I've fortunately in the past, haven't had to deal with ECOs since most of what I do is R&D, prototyping and one offs.
Thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
Re: Parts included/not included in ECN

Hello and welcome to the Cove!

One factor to consider is whether the attribute “assemblies where the item is used” is included in your system. If it is, then obviously parts B & C change under that generic change scenario.

Technically I tend to agree with your point of view, but it’s well established in business that “It’s the boss’s right to be the boss.” Tread lightly, and may the force be with you.

Ronen.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Flammability requirements for applied parts as per 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
K Initial capability studies on similar parts APQP and PPAP 7
Evelyn7E The fastest way to get supplier to ship good parts to you Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
B Cl. 9.2 - Moving parts - Applicable only to machinery? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
B How to test operator to see if they can catch the defective parts? Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
P Interchangeable/alternative parts in BOM (medical device) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
T Is handling chemically treated parts safe? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 18
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
aleexander Grounding of metallic accessible parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K 10 parts, 4 operators, 3 replications and each part has 3 location to measure. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
K Unused Service Parts in Newly Manufactured Medical Device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
M MSA angle issue - Nylon parts using Aberlink 3D Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
I What revalidation is necessary if we change parts in a WFI loop ? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
Fjalar Spare parts for discontinued MDD compliant class I medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S For Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) Is 100% Inspection Required? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 2
S Defibrillator Protection applicability When using Multiple applied parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
F Recording Nonconforming Purchased Parts Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
D Suggestions for Ishikawa for hyperdetailed customer - plastic molding automotive parts Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
R Is a FAIR required on parts that we design? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
C Packaging Long Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
D Separation of F-type applied part and remaining parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
John C. Abnet VDA 6.3 - Question 7.3 - "blocking of parts" VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 6
I When is necessary to have RoHS declaration on non-electrical parts? REACH and RoHS Conversations 1
Z Rapid audit template for plastic parts manufacturing process Manufacturing and Related Processes 12
C Scrapping on production floor - Setup parts 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
G Bad Parts cause Customer line stop IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
G Calibration of "Master Parts" Used as Gauges Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
P FDA Approved Product Contact Parts ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
M Identifying Applied Parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Nonconforming parts accepted by operator with intention Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 33
J Mechanical inspection techniques of close tolerance parts Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
J Sister-company providing parts is only ISO 9001 registered IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
A AS9100D 8.1.4 Prevention of Counterfeit Parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
C Difficulties getting RoHS/REACH for cheap parts RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1
G Same parts but new customer - What will the auditor ask me? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
G Need to change KPI we called NC parts (maximum 3%.) to FTQ (first time quality) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Q Do you classify applied parts? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
R Defib-proof applied parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
S Earthing of moving parts, designing tips IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
C Quantifying risk in choosing the number of parts, operators and replicates in a GR&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
Ed Panek Corona Virus impact on Supplier Audits and Received Parts ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
E IEC 60601-1 - Unearthed Medical Device Metal Parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
bryan willemot Shipping Aerospace parts without Stress certs Manufacturing and Related Processes 20
H Capability Data for Paint Thickness on Painted Parts Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
J SPC - Stamping parts - Small batch size Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
D 3 Companies - Medical device parts and substances - Responsibilities EU Medical Device Regulations 4
B Accessible parts per 8.4.2 b) - Touch currents in combination with MOOP or MOPP? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
J Traceability of component parts - Bolts, screws and washers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Traceability on Unmarked Parts - AS9100 requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
CPhelan Best metrics for monitoring low volume (<1000) parts per vendors Supply Chain Security Management Systems 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom