Parts used for Gage R&R's

T

t_partlow

#1
I do not work for a manufacturing company, so we do not have "parts" per se, but we do have reference and working standards. To perform a Gage R&R, is it necessary to know the "true" size of what you are measuring? Example: R&R on a micrometer, do I need to know the actual size of the gage block? Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

howste

Thaumaturge
Trusted Information Resource
#2
No, you don't need to know the true size of the part. R&R is only looking at the variability of the measuring system.
 
A

Atul Khandekar

#3
t_partlow,

Howste is right. You do not need to know the true or nominal value. You'll need to know the expected measurement range - tolerance / spec width &/or the process variation - though, because parts should be selected to cover this range. I am not sure how you would construct your "parts" with gage blocks.

Welcome to the forums! :bigwave:
 
T

t_partlow

#4
My problem

We presently use an electronic differential level for calibrating granite surface plates. My original thought was to "calibrate" a surface plate "X" number of times with "Y" operators and base the calculations on the results. However, this will not cover the entire measurement range of the levels. The other way I came up with is to use a sine plate and gage blocks to generate angles covering the entire measurement range of the levels. I'm not really sure which would be better. Any insight would be a great help.
 
J

Jay Sturgeon

#5
Agree with Atul

t_partlow,

Howste is right. You do not need to know the true or nominal value. You'll need to know the expected measurement range - tolerance / spec width &/or the process variation - though, because parts should be selected to cover this range. I am not sure how you would construct your "parts" with gage blocks.


I totally agree with Atul.



I also welcome to the forums!


Good LuckQ

:thedeal:
 
R

Ryan Wilde

#6
t_partlow said:
We presently use an electronic differential level for calibrating granite surface plates. My original thought was to "calibrate" a surface plate "X" number of times with "Y" operators and base the calculations on the results. However, this will not cover the entire measurement range of the levels. The other way I came up with is to use a sine plate and gage blocks to generate angles covering the entire measurement range of the levels. I'm not really sure which would be better. Any insight would be a great help.
Actually, if you are using the levels that I am thinking of, the gages themselves lend very little to the variations in the process of calibrating granite surface plates. The process of moving the levels to each point winds up being 80% or more of the variation. Surface inperfections of granite, variations in placement, dust on the plate, temperature fluctuations, etc. will be you major contributors. When you measure a plate, check your closure errors. Those will, by and large, be very close to being your process variation.

Granted, I've never done a GR&R, as I've always had to perform full uncertainty budgets, which takes quite a bit more into account. But as far as variation goes, your tool won't be the cause.

Ryan
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
G Calibration of "Master Parts" Used as Gauges Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
Marc Boeing caught selling used parts as new to Pentagon (Oct 2013) World News 3
C Customer Requirement to Detect and Preclude use of Counterfeit & Used Parts Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
M Use of Trichloroethylene and Spirit to Clean SS Parts used in Orthopedic Surgery Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 4
P Disposal of Plastic used in Medical Parts (Scrap) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Y Are multiple MSAs for a single device used on different parts necessary? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
J Used Parts in Medical Devices - Opinions on Servicing and Repair 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
R DCMA Sampleing for CAI Parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
R Aviation Spare Parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
L PACCAR Parts Supplier Portal? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Patient connection and accessible parts - enclosure IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
W Difference between Appliances and Parts according EASA EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
B Pressure containing and pressure controling parts for ball valves Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
T Counterfeit parts training AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
K Process FMEA responsible For "Make to Design Parts" (Inhouse or Suppliers ?) FMEA and Control Plans 3
Q AS9100 Counterfeit Parts Prevention/Mitigation Work Instruction? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
H Does ISO state in anyway that we MUST keep physical first piece parts? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
B Spare parts of medical device need CE mark? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
G Injection Molded Parts in Verification & Validation Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 3
bryan willemot Chain of custody form for counterfeit parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
J Cleaning Process for Delicate Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
C Mistake Proofing Winding Direction Stamped Metal Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
M Is PPAP suitable for Inhouse parts? Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
T Simulate Tolerance Range with Real Parts Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
8 MSA--Should I Use Parts or Gage Pins? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
S EU MDR-Replacement Parts when not manufacture is not yet EU MDR compliant US Medical Device Regulations 2
P IMDS Multiple parts RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 2
E How to isolate multiple APPLIED PARTS IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
R Gage Measuring 15 Parts at a Time Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
H Better to retain previous made parts or one part that is perfect Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
K Looking for a tape to perform cross hatch test on powder coating parts Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3
A Are defective returned spare parts to be considered as a complaint? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
G Lifecycle / Expected Service Life of Steel Parts Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 5
G Shipping Validation of Non-Sterile Parts? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 9
L En 62368 How to complete with incomplete parts details CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
R MSA on set of parts with low variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 20
H Project management for automotive parts IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
Q BMW Supplied Parts Quality Management -> Is there any new supplier quality manual? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
M Declaration of Conformity and Spare Parts EU Medical Device Regulations 0
T Accessible metal parts connected to secondary ground IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
M Metal parts bonding/grounding on Class II, internally powered with functional earth? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
R Flammability requirements for applied parts as per 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
K Initial capability studies on similar parts APQP and PPAP 7
Evelyn7E The fastest way to get supplier to ship good parts to you Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
B Cl. 9.2 - Moving parts - Applicable only to machinery? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
B How to test operator to see if they can catch the defective parts? Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
P Interchangeable/alternative parts in BOM (medical device) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
T Is handling chemically treated parts safe? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 18
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
aleexander Grounding of metallic accessible parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom