Performance Reviews - Motivator or Demotivator?

D

Desara01

#1
I work for a turnaround company. And, thankfully, things are turning around due to a lot of hard work and leadership's willingness to try something different.

We're having a spirited debate over Peformance Reviews and whether or not to establish this process.

I have always had mixed emotions about these reviews. Some of my general observations:
  • It doesn't matter how good a job you've done all year or what you've accomplished, it's usually the last 30 days that count.
  • They're usually personal, not based upon facts, so very subjective
  • Performance feedback should be happening on a continual basis. While it's never happened to me personally, several of my colleagues have walked into these reviews and gotten slammed for not meeting some unknown objective, or (as the author says) "your coworkers have come to me and said...." It's humiliating.
  • At Amoco your raise was tied to it. In the last couple of years I was there they started requiring managers to "force rank" their employees, they could only award a certain number of excellents etc. TO me, if all employees aren't performing, whose fault is that? The manager's! They should be coaching and guiding - and if the person is wrong for the job they should spare the employee the humiliation of sub-standard work and find the right job for them - or do them a favor and let them go...

So maybe the annual process isn't the way to go, but we definitely need something.

Creak, groan... that's me gingerly stepping down from the sopabox.

Anyone have something to share on this subject - offer up a review process that actually drives the right behavior?? :bigwave:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#2
I think you nailed the problem. Can't live with 'em (especially when they do not have a raise), can't live without them (they didn't really ever tell you if you were doing a good job or not). Its effectiveness is complicated, supported and/or defeated by the corporate culture, too. I doubt if there is a definitive good answer to this question!

Oh, wait....there is one definitive answer:

It depends! :cool:
 
#3
My recent review was great! Exceeded all aspects of performance on the form! I love 'em!:notme::rolleyes:;)

My experience is that's it's a lot to do with the organization's management culture and style plus how the thing is administered and actioned. A looooong time ago, when I worked for Rank Xerox their eval. was great - but then they were a great company to work for, some of the best processes and management I've ever experienced.

Others have been really bad. A previous employer did an on-line survey (admittedly, it was a 'cultural vitality' survey not a performance review) and, of course, they did nothing about the results, because it didn't fit with their expectations! Guess what? Most of us don't work there now!;):rolleyes:
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#4
Great comments so far on a very important subject.

I hate performance reviews - almost all aspects of them. :mad: It's so easy to get them wrong, and doing so can cause a lot of damage.

In a turnaround group, perhaps people could instead run on short cycles based on team projects, and celebrate positive results in a more timely way than annual reviews. :2cents:
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#5
Last year when doing my Performance Development Review the question was asked "What are your aspirations?"

My answer (and this is the truth)..."I aspire to not aspire."

Not one comment came back:lol:
 
#6
Last year when doing my Performance Development Review the question was asked "What are your aspirations?"

My answer (and this is the truth)..."I aspire to not aspire."

Not one comment came back:lol:
Randy - Don't you want to be rich and famous? BSI's Auditor of the Year? C'mon - it sounds like you've given up! Maybe 'most southern Cover'? There must be something......
 
D

Desara01

#8
Jennifer I like the way you're thinking.

I think that's the right approach, everyone focused on the objectives immediately at hand.

Thanks everyone:bigwave:
 
J

JaneB

#9
  • It doesn't matter how good a job you've done all year or what you've accomplished, it's usually the last 30 days that count.
    - Only if they are done annually, surely?
  • They're usually personal, not based upon facts, so very subjective
    Sign of a bad process & lack of understanding/skill on part of the reviewer
  • Performance feedback should be happening on a continual basis.
    Yes it "should" in theory. But does it actually? What makes it happen? Far too often, this means it actually happens never/only very rarely.
  • At Amoco your raise was tied to it. In the last couple of years I was there they started requiring managers to "force rank" their employees, they could only award a certain number of excellents etc. - I would argue this is a flaw in that particular process
You say "So maybe the annual process isn't the way to go, but we definitely need something." Which is the key issue IMO - how does one actually do it (ie, if you don't have PR, what's the alternative)?

I'm neither for nor agin them - like you, I've seen them done badly. But I've also seen them done well (on a few occasions). The best of them are done at least twice a year, with a clear process, training for the managers doing them, and a structured set of guidlines & definitions to support them.

Often, when I go into a new company & ask about this, managers will say they're not needed, 'everyone knows' how they're performing. When I ask the people, I almost never get the same response!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D

domingue

#10
I haven't been at my current company long enough to see the whole process through, but from what I can tell, it's a good one.

At the beginning of the annual cycle, you develop a set of objectives for the year with your manager. These objectives get reviewed formally after 6 months and you get a status (or a change in objectives as necessary). They're formally reviewed again at the end of the cycle. I think raises are at least partly based on this, but I haven't made it that far yet.

Additionally (I don't know if this is a company wide thing or just our program), I have a somewhat informal "one on one" with my manager every month. It's an open forum for him to tell me what I'm doing well and where I can improve and for me to bring up any issues I may have. The result is I've got an open line of communication with my boss, and I get constant feedback on my performance so there are never any surprises. These meetings are tracked by top leadership in the program to make sure they're taking place, and they hold themselves to the same requirements - our Value Stream Leader has monthly one-on-one's with the directors under him too.

Some might say that monthly reviews are overkill, but I rather like them. They don't feel like a "review" so much as a checkup to make sure everything is ok. I like the frequent feedback, and it keeps me constantly in tune with my manager's expectations and on track to accomplishing my goals. This way (as long as my boss is honest), I can't be blindsided at the formal reviews where it really counts.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ed Panek Do standards have performance reviews? General Information Resources 2
D Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) book - Reviews and suggestions wanted Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
Le Chiffre The Biggest Obstacle of Personnel Performance Reviews? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
J Employee Performance Reviews Examples Career and Occupation Discussions 6
D Essential performance and EMC immunity testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
G What does performance specification include? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
B Handling lower detection limits for SPC and process performance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
M IVDR and Performance Evaluation Plan CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
C Where to draw the line for "sufficient evidence" to verify safety/performance of a device? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
K IEC 62304 - Functional and performance requirements for SOUP items IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
K EU MDR Annex 1 Chapter III: Information in the Instructions for Use-23.4 (e) the performance characteristics of the device; EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Q ISO 9001 8.5.1 - Control of production and service performance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
W IEC 60601 - Essential performance c.2.34 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
S A clinical performance evaluation study with an IVD product as Investagional Use product - Clinical Monitor requirements 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
D Performance of high shear mixer (or rapid mixing granulator Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
M Do you need an Applicable general safety and performance requirements Checklist? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D Performance specification as a Risk Control Measure, EN 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7
G Defining performance metrics for DFMA implementation Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
B Four Key Performance Indicators for Continual Improvement (Dec. 3 2019) [Deleted] Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
F 5520A High Performance Multi-Product Calibrators General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
shimonv IEC 60601-1 Essential Performance - Is the signal accuracy specification an essential requirement? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
D Performance Qualification per GHTF Guidance Other Medical Device Related Standards 12
M Informational US FDA Final Guidance – Coronary, Peripheral, and Neurovascular Guidewires – Performance Tests and Recommended Labeling Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
O Performance Measurement ISO 9001: 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
O Monitoring performance - How do I determine performance measurement basis within my organization? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
M Informational MDCG 2019-9 Summary of safety and clinical performance A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies – August 2019 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Several US FDA draft guidances, including some specific device guidances for the Safety and Performance Based Pathway Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational USFDA final guidance – Safety and Performance Based Pathway Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
H How to prepare Performance Qualification (PQ) for autoclave General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Performance Standard for Balloon Trocars Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
M Informational TGA Consultation: Proposed changes to medical device essential principles for safety and performance Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
rezayatmand IEC 60601-2-18 Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-18: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of endoscopic equipmen IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
qualprod Ineffective follow up of people performance - Audit Nonconformance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
P Is there a counterpart to the General Safety and Performance Regulations for the USA? Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
D Summary of safety and clinical performance in GSPR MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Informational EU draft act – Single-use medical devices – safety and performance requirements for reprocessing Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
B Essential Performance of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography Device IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Informational USFDA final guidance – Recommended Content and Format of Non-Clinical Bench Performance Testing Information in Premarket Submissions Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational USFDA draft guidance – Technical Performance Assessment of Quantitative Imaging in Device Premarket Submissions Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational USFDA – Radiological Health Regulations; Amendments to Records and Reports for Radiation Emitting Electronic Products; Amendments to Performance Stand Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Characterization Testing - NO acceptance criteria, no minimum performance requirement Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
D IEC 60601-1 - Essential performance doesn't make sense IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 10
M Product Performance Claims Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
P Performance evaluation (IVDD Annex VIII) & Design and Development Validation Studies EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C How frequent to conduct Clinical / Performance Evaluation? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
M Informational USFDA Final Guidance – Safety and Performance Based Pathway Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M FDA News USFDA – Safety and Performance Based Pathway Guidance Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
O Clean room performance qualification (pq) - How many times can I do each test? Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
M Medical Device News TGA – Regulator Performance Framework: Self-assessment Report, July 2017 to June 2018 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
S Package performance testing for non-sterile Hydrogels US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom