D
duck5
Hi all,
I am used to doing G r and R but always I have been using a specification range and therefore getting the % error of the spec.
In this case I have no specification. Basically we are doing some work on liver tissue and we want to see how accurate our measurement technique is. We have the number of operators, samples and distinct categories but we have no spec. Essentially we don't need one, we just nee to make sure we can can measure the cut depth on a piece of tissue.
Any recommendations for this one? I am thinking of making up a spec range based on what depths we are getting but this will skew my data as the % error will be incorrect.
I am used to doing G r and R but always I have been using a specification range and therefore getting the % error of the spec.
In this case I have no specification. Basically we are doing some work on liver tissue and we want to see how accurate our measurement technique is. We have the number of operators, samples and distinct categories but we have no spec. Essentially we don't need one, we just nee to make sure we can can measure the cut depth on a piece of tissue.
Any recommendations for this one? I am thinking of making up a spec range based on what depths we are getting but this will skew my data as the % error will be incorrect.