PFMEA for an Assembly Process - Stuck in first steps

A

AlbertV

#1
Good morning Gents and ladies,

I'm leading a team (for the 1st time) that is doing PFMEA for an assembly process, and we are stuck in the first steps of it as we fail to find a rational way of doing it. We have tried different ways, but all of them have led to a doubtful path.

I'll describe the process: we have a steel part with a machined hole to a certain diameter and a rubber seal that must be assembled to prevent air leakage through it. Assembly process goes like this: operator dips seal in soap solution, loads it to assembly machine, loads steel part and the machine nails the seal in the hole. In a further operation, the part is run through a leakage test to check if it is sealed.

There are a couple of logics we have followed that didn't lead us to a satisfactory outcome:

1) Break assembly operation in small bits: first bit is dipping operation, with a Requirement like 'dip complete part'. Failure mode could be 'seal is not completely dipped', effect could be 'seal cannot be completely assembled, therefore it will leak when used by the customer', and cause 'standard work not followed'. We know that our leakage test device effectively protects our customer from receiving it, but it detects the EFFECT of the failure mode, so it should not be considered... Following this logic, we get a high RPN when we know that this failure mode will never reach our customer. :confused:

Moreover, one of the following bits of the process is the assembly movement of the machine, with a Requirement 'nail seal into its final position'. One of the potential failure modes for it is 'seal not completely nailed', which is the effect of the dipping operation failure mode. The root cause for this is the same as it was in the dipping operation... Are we working double? :confused:

2) Consider assembly operation as a whole: assembly operation requirement is 'nail seal into its final position'. One of the potential failure modes for it is 'seal not completely nailed', the effect is once again 'leakage at customer'. One of the root causes is once again 'part not completely dipped in soap solution'. Again high RPN because leakage test is not considered... :confused:

Sorry for the long write. Any help will be very appreciated, as we are running in circles and the team morale is quickly lowering. :thanx:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

AlbertV

#2
I keep reading about PFMEA's in the Cove. This thread has been very clarifying: How Should I Describe a Failure Mode?. Now I understand that I must decide which way to approach failure modes in PFMEA (as 'product modes' or as 'process modes').

Also, now I see the need to focus the scope of the analysis instead of bouncing around from operation-level (high-level) and step-level (detail-level). Last post on previous thread from adamsjm explains it clearly: http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?p=462688&postcount=24

Anyway, experienced inputs on this issue are more than welcomed.


Moderator Note: Post edited to add live hyperlinks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#3
I keep reading about PFMEA's in the Cove. This thread has been very clarifying: How Should I Describe a Failure Mode?. Now I understand that I must decide which way to approach failure modes in PFMEA (as 'product modes' or as 'process modes').

Also, now I see the need to focus the scope of the analysis instead of bouncing around from operation-level (high-level) and step-level (detail-level). Last post on previous thread from adamsjm explains it clearly: http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?p=462688&postcount=24

Anyway, experienced inputs on this issue are more than welcomed.


Moderator Note: Post edited to add live hyperlinks.
I edited your post to include the links. You're on the right track by searching. :agree1: I suggest that you also look to past failures in the process to try and understand what needs to be controlled.

As far as format is concerned, you should probably describe the overall process in the leftmost column of the PFMEA form, and then each step or operation underneath that. When trying to determine what constitutes and individual step, think in terms of the possible process failure modes. If a potential failure is unique to a given process step, that process step should get its own line item on the PFMEA form.
 

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#4
1) Break assembly operation in small bits: first bit is dipping operation, with a Requirement like 'dip complete part'. Failure mode could be 'seal is not completely dipped', effect could be 'seal cannot be completely assembled, therefore it will leak when used by the customer', and cause 'standard work not followed'. We know that our leakage test device effectively protects our customer from receiving it, but it detects the EFFECT of the failure mode, so it should not be considered... Following this logic, we get a high RPN when we know that this failure mode will never reach our customer. :confused:
I wouldn't mind considering detection control of the effect for rpn calculation provided it reflects the risk in appropriate sense. As much as I understand your process, leakage testing is the mechanism to detect failure mode/cause, albeit not directly.
 
A

AlbertV

#5
Thanks both for your help. We have followed your advice and today meeting has been much more productive :)

Lesson learnt for me is: don't get stuck with how PFMEA should be done, just do it the way it is useful for you. Decide the way that it suits you better and stick to it.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#6
Thanks both for your help. We have followed your advice and today meeting has been much more productive :)

Lesson learnt for me is: don't get stuck with how PFMEA should be done, just do it the way it is useful for you. Decide the way that it suits you better and stick to it.
So long as your customers don't squawk about your chosen method, you should be just fine. :agree1:
 
M

megahertz

#7
PFMEA should have more concern on process. As such it is better to break into detail steps rather than putting everything as a whole and it will be more easy if you put in process number accordingly. For an example, assembly process may start from 3000 to 3999 and each sub process in assembly should be numbered with 3001, 3002, 3003 and so on.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N DFMEA, Drawings and PFMEA of an Assembly Process FMEA and Control Plans 12
Chennaiite PFMEA (Process FMEA) for Vehicle Assembly wanted FMEA and Control Plans 4
W Actual examples of FMEA (DFMEA, PFMEA) for Car Assembly Process IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
K Change in Occurrence for Low Volume Assembly Process FMEA (PFMEA) FMEA and Control Plans 8
A How do you structure your IC Assembly and Testing PFMEA (Process FMEA)? FMEA and Control Plans 10
R PFMEA for a Membrane Assembly - Automotive Application FMEA and Control Plans 10
P Is PFMEA for Manufacturing and Assembly Processes Only? FMEA and Control Plans 11
P Equipment URS, pFMEA and dFMEA ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
W Pfmea function requirement and failure mode FMEA and Control Plans 6
G Control Plan & PFMEA Review Procedure? FMEA and Control Plans 1
M Material incoming to the production process reflected in PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 9
R Power Failure or Cold Start Situation in PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 6
M "Issue & continuous improvement" columns in AIAG-VDA PFMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 4
C AIAG-VDA PFMEA - 1st special Characteristics? [5step vs. 6step] FMEA and Control Plans 3
T Linking Control Plans and PFMEA's FMEA and Control Plans 3
T PFMEA and Control Plans on legacy product FMEA and Control Plans 5
R DFMEA/PFMEA mitigation of high severity (9-10) in low volume products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
T Annual Validation as a detection mode on a PFMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 5
P Understanding DFMEA and PFMEA - Supplier Related IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
A ISO 14971 PFMEA Manufacturing Risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
D Can PFMEA be used in disposition of NC material? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
V Customer Print Specifications on PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 13
blile Increasing PFMEA occurrence ranking after non-conformance FMEA and Control Plans 4
A PFMEA new AIAG FMEA and Control Plans 0
Q Is that any difficulty to do software DFMEA and PFMEA in ISO 13485? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
bobdoering Informational New AIAG PFMEA Process - Excel Template Attached FMEA and Control Plans 23
A Redesigning our process flow chart, PFMEA and Control Plan Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 4
A PFMEA English language question IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Is there any connection between PFMEA and Acceptance Plan FMEA and Control Plans 1
K PFMEA (Process FMEA) - Can be common for 3000 products? FMEA and Control Plans 2
N PFMEA repetitive failure modes in subsecuent stations. FMEA and Control Plans 1
T DFMEA/PFMEA and SCCAF alignment FMEA and Control Plans 19
N Control plan evaluation methods - Which methods should be carried over from the PFMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 3
A PFMEA - How long should the recommended actions remain in the recommended actions column? APQP and PPAP 3
S How to fulfill PFMEA "requirement" column? FMEA and Control Plans 2
T Informational Family or Baseline PFMEA Rules FMEA and Control Plans 22
A PFMEA severity score different applications FMEA and Control Plans 11
M Control Method correspondence between PFMEA and CP FMEA and Control Plans 8
O Difference Between PFMEA & Control Plan FMEA and Control Plans 3
N In-Process Production Test Stations in PFMEA (Process FMEA) FMEA and Control Plans 18
W Is the RPN (risk priority number) in the PFMEA really a RPN without the detectability ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
I Making a process PFMEA, no DFMEA (non-automotive toll manufacturer) FMEA and Control Plans 1
Proud Liberal DFMEA / PFMEA linkage - Where in the standards do I find it? FMEA and Control Plans 5
N PQC (Product Quality Characteristics) and PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 3
N PFMEA Potential Failure Mode for Weight FMEA and Control Plans 5
M I need a sample Reverse PFMEA Process Checklist FMEA and Control Plans 2
C PFMEA example with machining (lathe+mill) FMEA and Control Plans 1
L Simple Example for PFMEA / Control Plan Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
B Proactive efforts to reduce risk - PFMEA risk reduction activities IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom