Pitfalls of ISO 9001 - Paper for an operations management class

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
> >From: "bill hudson"
> >Subject: Q: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson
>
> Hello my name is Bill Hudson and I am a student at Eastern Kentucky
> University.
>
> I am taking an operations management class and one of my assignments is to
> write a paper on the pitfalls of ISO 9000. After conducting an extensive
> search, I have come up blank. Can you help me to identify some of the
> pitfalls associated with being ISO cetified?
> I would greatly appreciate any help you could give me. I have heard from
> other people that if any one could help it would be this discusson list.
>
> Thank you very much,
> >Bill Hudson

From: Brian Magee
Subject: RE: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Hernandez/MaGee

One pitfall is documenting what you think you should be doing or would like to be doing, BUT are not actually doing. The results are often findings, because you are not following your documented process. My advice is to keep it simple.

Brian

> From: "Hernandez,Carlos"
> Subject: RE: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Hernandez
>
> Hello Bill,
>
> The pitfalls that come to mind: Development Costs, Implementation Costs,
> and Maintenance Costs.
>
> However, the pitfalls are balanced by the ability to conduct business with
> the customer that requires the ISO certification.
>
> Carlos
>
-----------------------

Subject: Re: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Pfrang
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 12:57:12 -0600

From: Doug Pfrang
Subject: Re: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Pfrang

After reading what my colleagues have said about the pitfalls of ISO 9000, I will offer both a mainstream response and a non-mainstream response.

I. The mainstream response is that it is hard to add to what has already been said. In my experience, some of the biggest mistakes with ISO 9000 arise when upper management undertakes the effort:

(i) for the wrong reasons (e.g., a certificate to hang in the lobby, a logo to stamp on the letterhead, a miracle to solve other problems, etc.);

(ii) with the wrong expectations (e.g., it won't require employees to be trained, it won't require any resources to create and maintain, management doesn't need to be involved, etc.); and

(iii) with the wrong plan (e.g., we'll pay a consultant to write our procedures and then we'll be done, we'll continue to measure our performance solely in quarterly financial terms, we have to document everything down to the most minute detail, we'll treat it as an expense rather than as an investment, etc.).

The above mistakes lead to a poor implementation, which costs the company a lot more time and money than necessary, which undermines employee productivity and company performance -- exactly the opposite of what it should achieve.

II. The non-mainstream response is that it is utterly meaningless to discuss the "pitfalls" of ISO 9000, because ISO 9000 has no pitfalls. ISO 9000 is a tool -- it belongs in the same family as a chainsaw, an electric drill or a welding torch. Like any tool, if a company uses it correctly, the company can dramatically improve its performance and profitability; but if the company uses it incorrectly, the company will waste a lot of time and money. Thus, writing a paper about the "pitfalls" of ISO 9000 is as misguided as writing a paper about the "pitfalls" of using a chainsaw, an electric drill or a welding torch: the only "pitfall" lies not in the tool, but in the risk of someone using it incorrectly. And you will discover that it is into this latter category that all mainstream responses (including mine) belong.

Good luck with your assignment!

-- Doug Pfrang
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
From: "Schoonover, John L." sylvania.com
Subject: RE: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Hubbard/Schoonover

Keep also in mind that some of the arguments proposed are truly bizarre. For example:

"Writing good documentation is hard work. So, once the procedures have been certified by the ISO auditor, it is easier to stick with the approved documents even if the procedures they govern turn out to be flawed. Probably the great majority of all ISO 9000 certified plants follow flawed procedures because living with defective processes is less work than fixing the processes and revising the ISO documents."

Now, would you truly believe that ISO 9000 ought to be blamed for a manufacturing organization so moronic that they continue to follow procedures they know to be bad because changing them involves rewriting documentation?
 
D

Don Winton

#3
ISO 9000 is a tool -- it belongs in the same family as a chainsaw, an electric drill or a welding torch.
Amen and well said!

Like any tool, if a company uses it correctly, the company can dramatically improve its performance and profitability; but if the company uses it incorrectly, the company will waste a lot of time and money.
Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance… (emphasis mine)

model (mòd´l) noun: A schematic description of a system, theory, or phenomenon that accounts for its known or inferred properties and may be used for further study of its characteristics: a model of generative grammar; a model of an atom; an economic model.

From the Introduction:

It is emphasized that the quality system requirements specified in this {the particular standard used} are complementary (not alternative) to the technical (product) specified requirements. They specify requirements which determine what elements quality systems have to encompass, but it is not the purpose of these {the particular standards used} to enforce uniformity of quality systems. They are generic and independent of any specific industry or economic sector. The design and implementation of a quality system will be influenced by the varying needs of an organization, its particular objectives, the products and services supplied and the processes and specific practices employed. (emphasis mine)

The above combined tell us one thing: ISO 900x is not a panacea for ills; it is the structure upon which the cure may be found.

…manufacturing organization so moronic that they continue to follow procedures they know to be bad because changing them involves rewriting documentation?
Is this really happening?

Regards,
Don

------------------
Just the ramblings of an Old Wizard Warrior.
 
J

Jetlag

#4
Marc said:
> >From: "bill hudson"
> >Subject: Q: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson
>
> Hello my name is Bill Hudson and I am a student at Eastern Kentucky
> University.
>
> I am taking an operations management class and one of my assignments is to
> write a paper on the pitfalls of ISO 9000. After conducting an extensive
> search, I have come up blank. Can you help me to identify some of the
> pitfalls associated with being ISO cetified?
> I would greatly appreciate any help you could give me. I have heard from
> other people that if any one could help it would be this discusson list.
>
> Thank you very much,
> >Bill Hudson

From: Brian Magee
Subject: RE: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Hernandez/MaGee

One pitfall is documenting what you think you should be doing or would like to be doing, BUT are not actually doing. The results are often findings, because you are not following your documented process. My advice is to keep it simple.

Brian

> From: "Hernandez,Carlos"
> Subject: RE: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Hernandez
>
> Hello Bill,
>
> The pitfalls that come to mind: Development Costs, Implementation Costs,
> and Maintenance Costs.
>
> However, the pitfalls are balanced by the ability to conduct business with
> the customer that requires the ISO certification.
>
> Carlos
>
-----------------------

Subject: Re: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Pfrang
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 12:57:12 -0600

From: Doug Pfrang
Subject: Re: Pitfalls of ISO9000? /Hudson/Pfrang

After reading what my colleagues have said about the pitfalls of ISO 9000, I will offer both a mainstream response and a non-mainstream response.

I. The mainstream response is that it is hard to add to what has already been said. In my experience, some of the biggest mistakes with ISO 9000 arise when upper management undertakes the effort:

(i) for the wrong reasons (e.g., a certificate to hang in the lobby, a logo to stamp on the letterhead, a miracle to solve other problems, etc.);

(ii) with the wrong expectations (e.g., it won't require employees to be trained, it won't require any resources to create and maintain, management doesn't need to be involved, etc.); and

(iii) with the wrong plan (e.g., we'll pay a consultant to write our procedures and then we'll be done, we'll continue to measure our performance solely in quarterly financial terms, we have to document everything down to the most minute detail, we'll treat it as an expense rather than as an investment, etc.).

The above mistakes lead to a poor implementation, which costs the company a lot more time and money than necessary, which undermines employee productivity and company performance -- exactly the opposite of what it should achieve.

II. The non-mainstream response is that it is utterly meaningless to discuss the "pitfalls" of ISO 9000, because ISO 9000 has no pitfalls. ISO 9000 is a tool -- it belongs in the same family as a chainsaw, an electric drill or a welding torch. Like any tool, if a company uses it correctly, the company can dramatically improve its performance and profitability; but if the company uses it incorrectly, the company will waste a lot of time and money. Thus, writing a paper about the "pitfalls" of ISO 9000 is as misguided as writing a paper about the "pitfalls" of using a chainsaw, an electric drill or a welding torch: the only "pitfall" lies not in the tool, but in the risk of someone using it incorrectly. And you will discover that it is into this latter category that all mainstream responses (including mine) belong.

Good luck with your assignment!

-- Doug Pfrang


HAHAHAHAHA That's why insurance costs are out of control....misuse of the tool!!!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Avoiding Pitfalls in ISO 9001:2015 Transition - Free webinar Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
M Routes to IEC 60601 Compliance: Discussion of Merits and Pitfalls IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 10
8 Introducing a Balance Line - Identifying potential future pitfalls etc. Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
G Investigator - Lead Study - FDA pitfalls? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
Y How to Overcome the Pitfalls of Six Sigma Implementation Problem Six Sigma 20
C What are the Pitfalls of On-Site Calibration Services? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
L Identifying Common Pitfalls in GR&R (Gage R&R) Studies - Measurement System Analysis Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 29
M Complete revamp of quality systems required - Major pitfalls I should try to avoid Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 12
C The Common Pitfalls of Implementing a New System in a Company Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 9
Z Auditor Findings ISO 14001:2015 vs. 45001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
S Supplier Management ISO 13485: 2016- Which supplier needs to fill in a self assessment form? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO/IEC 17021-1 clause 7.1.2 - Determination of competence criteria Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
G ISO 17023 2017-11 - Suggestions for good books ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
B Timeframe for updating QMS / transitioning from ISO 14971:2012 to ISO 14971:2019 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
M ISO 9001:2015 and AS6081:2012 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Gage calibration frequency, ISO and IATF - What are the requirements Calibration Frequency (Interval) 3
M FDA News FDA Releases Draft Guidance Clarifying Application of ISO 10993-1 Biocompatibility Standard Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
C Implementation ISO 9001: 2015 ? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
C ISO/ IEC 17021 Resource requirement (need help) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
J Possible to get ISO 13485 certified with only OEM Product? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D ISO 14971:2019 vs MDR Annex 1, Requirement #4 - "Manufacturers shall inform users of any residual risks" ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
D Definition of equipment for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
L Biological Assessment (ISO 10993-1) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M ISO 13485:2016 Complaint Definition Clarity Customer Complaints 2
eule del ayre Documented Information - Periodic Review of Documents? IATF 16949:2016 / ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
J ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001 & OHSAS18000 (IMS) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
G ISO 14001 - 6.1.3 Compliance Obligations ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
D Rules for Paper Forms outside of an eQMS - 3 Questions (ISO 13485) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
S Qualification question - ISO 13485 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
K ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 'Any necessary CA shall be taken without undue delay' ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
Aymaneh ISO 11607-1: 2019 main changes Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
G National Structural Steel Specification 7th Edition - Do I now have to be audited against ISO 3843-3 as well as ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
J How much to charge for helping a startup company with initial ISO 13485 certification? Consultants and Consulting 3
J ISO 13485 System 'soft start' - How to best reflect this in initial audits, management review minutes and other records? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
L How to understand the clause 6 Planning of ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
D ISO 13485 - 7.3.6 Design and development verification - Do most folks create a separate SOP? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
B ISO 8536-4 Contamination Index ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
S Practical Implementation of ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 6
C ISO 13485 :2016 - CAPA - Does every CAPA need to be checked by regulations? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
L Process changes and biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
J Recommendations for online ISO 19011 training? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
D ISO 13485 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 - Customer Feedback and Customer Complaints ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
S Requirements to obtain ISO 50001 Certification ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
A ISO 11135:2014, B.1.4, BI resistance x product bioburden ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Sravan Manchikanti How to interpret '8.3 Control of nonconforming product' for SaMD device while implementing ISO 13485 & MDSAP ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
J Sister-company providing parts is only ISO 9001 registered IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
M Getting started in ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 21
G Copy of withdrawn ISO 9001:1994 Quality Management Standard ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
P ISO 80369 and endoscope port/lumen Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom