James, I agree, the agenda looks good. What do your subsequent MINUTES look like? Back in the "olden days" where I am we used to do very brief, to the point agendas like this and later produced minutes that just had the brief "bullet points" of what was discussed/decided for each point. We had an auditor STRONGLY suggest we get more detailed, at least in the minutes.
At first, I must say I chafed at the idea - there's obviously nothing in the standard that REQUIRES detailed minutes! - but I will say that as it has developed over the years the minutes themselves are powerful tools in an audit. I said in an earlier post that I often use the tact of "answering the auditor's question before s/he can ask it." I often USE the minutes from the MRT meeting to do just that - address things that came up in the MRT that I KNOW an auditor will be interested in pursuing - give them all the details THERE, in that document. She never needs to go further chasing rabbits from the MRT.