Pondering "Document Control Made Easy" by Craig Cochran

Douglas E. Purdy

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
atetsade
Forum Contributor

http://www.qualitydigest.com/june02...doccontrol.html

I really like this article and I've read it from time to time to regain perspective.

atetsade,

I enjoyed the read, "Document Control Made Easy" by Craig Cochran! Thanks!

I do not know if it is appropriate to ask some questions about the article here or not, but I would like to discuss some items from the article. [I'm sure the Moderators will do with this as they see best.]

Under "Reviewing, Updating and Reapproving Documents," I was hit with the statement that "the standard requires an organization to review documents periodically to see if they're still valid. If they are, the organization reapproves them. If they are not, either a revision is made or the document is declared obsolete." Mr. Cochran goes on to suggest there are three ways to handle a document review. A recall on a strictly periodic basis; a review, update as necessary and then reapprove based on business triggers or real-world events that affect a document; and use of the internal audit process to review documents.

To begin with, the standard does not say 'periodically.' That may be implied or inferred, but not stated - right?

I worked in a DoD contractor where they routinely reviewed their Corporate Policies, Departmental Directives, and Sectional Instructions (I particpated in performing reviews), but I have not developed such a system of document control. (Parenthetically, that employment was long before the Process-Based Approach to a Quality Management System.) How do those who have written such a control deal with the reapproved documents? Do you indicate such a status on the document, or maintain evidence of a review in a seperate record system?

Mr. Cochran seems to indicate that all documents must go through this review and reapproval process, "If an organization intends to use its internal auditing process to satisfy this requirement, then extra care must be taken when planning and scheduling audits to ensure that all documents are sampled during an extended period." Is that so, or only those documents that I would designate that need to go through a review and reapproval process?

What approach have you utilized to meet this requirement?

Under "Making Documents Legible and Identifiable," Mr. Cochran states "Legibility means that documents can be read and understood. They should be written in a clear, decipherable manner, in the language spoken by document users." I looked for the word 'legible' in 9000:2000, and did not find it. Is this definition true? Is it stated somewhere in 9000 or 9001 and I missed it? I just do not believe that readability and understooding are criteria for legibility. Have you seen that Email that has gone around where spelling was hardly accurate, but the paragraph with understandable? As for multi-lingual (sp?) process participants, there is a paradigm in language acquisition that states that imitation precedes comprehension which precedes expression. This would indicate that I can comprehend much better than I can speak. Why should readability and undersatnding be a criterian for legibility?

I also found it interesting under "Control of External Documents" that Mr. Cochran makes the observation that "paper-based internal documents should also have their distribution controlled, but this isn't specifically required by ISO 9001:2000." I agree with the observation and that the likely hood of getting a nonconformace while ensuring "that relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use" would be greater if I did not have controlled distribution of the internal documents.

Just some thoughts to ponder or discuss.

Doug
I was not getting any takers in the 9001 forum, so thought I would try here. Here are the questions:

To begin with, the standard does not say 'periodically.' That may be implied or inferred, but not stated - right?
How do those who have written such a control deal with the reapproved documents? Do you indicate such a status on the document, or maintain evidence of a review in a seperate record system?
What approach have you utilized to meet this requirement?
Under "Making Documents Legible and Identifiable," Mr. Cochran states "Legibility means that documents can be read and understood. They should be written in a clear, decipherable manner, in the language spoken by document users." I looked for the word 'legible' in 9000:2000, and did not find it. Is this definition true? Is it stated somewhere in 9000 or 9001 and I missed it? I just do not believe that readability and understooding are criteria for legibility. Have you seen that Email that has gone around where spelling was hardly accurate, but the paragraph with understandable? As for multi-lingual (sp?) process participants, there is a paradigm in language acquisition that states that imitation precedes comprehension which precedes expression. This would indicate that I can comprehend much better than I can speak. Why should readability and undersatnding be a criterian for legibility?
Still Pondering,
Doug
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
L

little__cee

#2
Legible = 4.2.3 (e)

4.2.3 (e) Control of Documents (ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2000) is where I find the reference to

e) to ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Douglas E. Purdy

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
Where is the definition for legible?

little__cee said:
4.2.3 (e) Control of Documents (ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2000) is where I find the reference to

e) to ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable


<a href='http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb008' target='_blank'><img src='http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/3/3_3_3.gif' border=0></a>
Okay, but does that mean that it has to be in the langauge of the person performing the task. whether a multi-lingual person or not?

Doug
 
M

mshell

#4
I take it to mean that you must protect them and make sure that they not be damaged beyond recognition or that they do not become illegible. You must know what they are and be able to read them.

mshell
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Document Control Metrics Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document Review and Document Approval --- 2 Signatures needed acc. §820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
I Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K 25-year lifetime of medical device - document storage period EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J UDI - Where to document it? EU Medical Device Regulations 8
T Controlling Expandable Forms in Paper-Based Document Control System Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S Changing revision status of a reviewed document Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
shimonv Document Control Procedure Header Content Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
Q Document ownerships Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
E Document Change Request forms (or no forms)? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
O Any info on release date of FDA “Computer Software Assurance for Manufacturing and Quality System Software” document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
B Document Approval Matrix Benchmarking Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Document Approval Signature Order Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
L How to add exemption or statement to control of document procedure? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M What is the proper way to document measurements Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
P Equipment 21 CFR 820.70(g) - User Requirements Document for Off the shelf equipment 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 7
B Do IFU designs have to be document controlled under ISO 13485? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
C Certificate of Conformance Form - COC for each customer a controlled document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
R Document Retention - Discard hard-copies after scanning? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P Mylar plot suppliers in accordance with D6-51991 document AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
A Document Change Notice vs complete System re-write Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Q Document approval through SharePoint (without signature) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
S What is considered a "core algorithm"? (From an FDA guidance document) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
U Document Approval - Software company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
I Nitpicking on document released dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
I Document Control on Log Files ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Refusal to Document Complaints Customer Complaints 39
Q Tracking Procedure Revisions (Document Control) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
I Master Document Access - ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.5.3 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
I Can a document (form) approval record be separate? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
I Control of Documentation Distribution - Document Control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
T Advice needed - Environmental MS - unwritten but customer requests policy document ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
T Control of downloaded document copies by employees Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
T Document control ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
I Is highlighting on a printed document considered a change? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
C QMS Document Management Software Recommendations Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 14
E Part 11 Compliance, Excel living documents (i.e. document master list, equipment list, approved supplier list) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
Sidney Vianna Informational New IAQG Document - AS9100 Clarifications of Intent AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
S How to determine & document Organizational Knowledge of a company Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
D Are medical device companies required to document every change made to their website? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
M Informational IMDRF draft document – Principles and Practices for Medical Device Cybersecurity Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Nonconformity for missing form number on the job description document Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
R Training Matrix for Document revisions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Controlled Document Location Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Setting deadlines (ex. 45 days) for Document Registration & Review Cycle Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom