FWIW - My primary responsibility is submitting PPAPs for replacement tooling (die casting), engineering changes to the part (customer and/or internally driven), and processing changes. We have, in the past, followed the "less than a year" guideline which most of our customers requested. Some of our customers now "spark" a part every submission. We have changed our Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to state that a material certification is required on each PPAP submission, unless otherwise directed by the customer. We have an in-house spectrometer so it is not that big a deal for us. We also pull samples from the holding furnace at the start and the end of a sample run, as well as, ongoing monitoring of our furnaces (we alloy most of our aluminum).
As to Dimensional Results - If it is an engineering change I normally only submit dimensionals affected by the change. All remaining dimensions are "as previously submitted and approved". I talk to the various Supplier Quality Engineers (SQEs) on a very regular basis and have formed some pretty fair relationships with them.Getting documentation from them (that this is acceptable) is not usually an issue. Obviously, with new tooling (replacement/additional cavity sets) a full layout is required.
With all that said, I have not seen a "time limit" specified in TS. As has been alluded to above, it is normally a Customer Specific Requirement (CSR).
Help some??
Bill