Practical Methods using Sampling by Variables

M

medical_eng

#1
Hi everyone,

Although not an expert, I am familiar with Z1.4 and I see that people generally have an easy time understanding it (QA staff up to the General Manager, suppliers, customers, etc.). Rejecting a lot is usually not taken lightly and if a lot is to be rejected it’s easy to point to the rejects/nonconformances to substantiate the decision.

One approach is to convert any variables type measurement to a pass/fail comparison and use Z1.4. This may be common practice in many companies but I don’t know. Supposedly, though, if you sample by variables you can reduce the sample size greatly, saving valuable time and cost.

I have two questions regarding sampling by variables:

1) I see three methods available and can’t decide which one would work out better in practice:
a. Using Z1.9 (which I don’t know very well yet).
b. Using ISO 16269-6 or similar (using the ‘k’ multiplier) and checking that the calculated intervals remain within the specification interval.
c. Calculating the capability indices and comparing that to a target (1.33, 1.67 or whatever).
Does anyone have any practical experience on this?

2) The whole procedure of sampling by variables and then comparing the calculated results to a target appears to involve ‘extrapolation’. Thus one could be in a position where all the sample results show a pass, but the calculations indicate that the lot should be rejected. How does one explain the need to throw out (or rework/sort/etc.) a lot when no actual bad parts have been found? Have any of you had this situation and what was done?

Thanks!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

DRAMMAN

#2
You are zeroing in on the actual value of a variables sampling plan. It is the same reason why try to use variable data to evaluate the quality of something. Both sampling approaches are trying to determine the same thing...does my lot of material have an acceptable defect percentage. People falsley believe that not finding defects in my sample indicates there are zero defects in the lot. All it means is that you have a confidence level (typically 95%) that the defect percentage is less than the AQL level. It also means ther eis a 5% risk the defect level is greater than the AQL level. Think about how many times production finds a high defect percentage even though no defects were found durring the attribute acceptrance sampling. That same shipment may have been rejected had variable sampling been used.

Those shipments with no sampling defects that are rejected with variable sampling will likely have defects in the lot. If you screen it 100% you will probably find defects. It is also possible you will not find any if the supplier somehow inspected them out. The valuable bit of information is you know know how the supplier's process is operating. Those defects are likely increasing your costs since your are most likely somehow paying for them in your price. Know you can go back to the supplier and push for process improvements using your capability data.
 
M

medical_eng

#3
No other comments or thoughts from others with experience in this area?

Hopefully someone has success with sampling by variables and can share their thoughts on the preferred methodology from the three suggested.

Thanks for your reply DRAMMAN, and while I don't disagree with your comments it still doesn't get to the root of the other half of my question. Perhaps stated another way, I need to convince the skeptics (myself included) that the system can 'work'. Imagine oneself with a batch of parts and the calculated result (based on a normality assumption) doesn't meet the target requirement/goal. So, in a contrived hypothetical situation, the general manager (who is not a guru in statistics) is now involved and asks "Show me the bad parts...". Under pressure of the situation I can see the conversation going bad really fast, which would be a mistake and a shame. What have others done in this situation or how have they avoided it to begin with?

One potential solution that I see is to pull the sample quantity by attributes to the required AQL but test a lesser quantity by variables. If everything works out you have saved labour, a good thing for everyone. If things don't work out on the variables indices, you keep going for the full sample size. If this finds no defects then the lot is deemed good and the variables indices are given no standing (maybe the standard deviation was a little off, throwing the numbers - opportunities for future improvement). If you fail both checks then you will have shown due diligence with the extra step and you will have 'defects' in hand to substantiate the decision. Any opinions on this proposal?

Thanks!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Employee motivation and empowerment - Please some practical methods IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
Bev D Essential References for Practical Quality Engineering Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
S Practical Implementation of ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 6
A What are Practical data center best practices IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 1
N Best practices for capturing audit objective evidence in a practical manner? Internal Auditing 3
B Practical ideas for information labelling in healthcare environment IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 2
M Getting into biotech QA from aerospace - Is it practical? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
Q Practical guide to scan for Risks in all QMS systems without missing any ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
Sidney Vianna Blockchain Technology - Any examples of practical application? The Reading Room 21
Q Practical Way to raise NCR's in an Assembly Workshop ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
C Practical use of Heat Input calculation for Manual MIG Welding Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
R Looking for Practical Advice in Managing Measurement Uncertainties Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
WEAVER Is GR&R really practical for a Measurescope? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
A 6 Sigma: Could you share some practical examples of 6 Sigma Projects in your company? Six Sigma 3
A Exploding the Myths Surrounding ISO 9000: A Practical Implementation Guide Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 28
L oPRP or CCP? Practical example Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 2
L Working closer and better with Suppliers - Practical ideas to improve? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
R Suggestions for a practical way to manage Contract Review Contract Review Process 5
O Practical 8-D or similar Problem Solving worksheet or form Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 5
M Need practical guide on TS 16949 Clause 7.6 Requirement IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M Practical Guidance on TS 16949 Clause 7.5.3 - Product Status Identification IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
P Random Sampling at Receiving Inspection: A Practical Implementation needed Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 13
C Practical Examples of completed ISO 19011:2011 Audit Reports General Auditing Discussions 5
T Practical Problem Solving - Does anyone have a practical problem solving template? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
S Practical Data Collection Process Recommendations? Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
S OPRP or HACCP Plan - Opinions and Practical Example Wanted Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 17
S Validation of Production Process - Practical Example ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
F Toyota A3 Practical Problem Solving (PPS) Document Needed Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
L Corrective Action Request Assessment and Prioritisation Criteria - Practical Examples Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
Q Father Of The Practical CMM, James Coggin (RIP) Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
I Practical definition of IEC62304 Software Items and Software Units IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 7
A Definition Modify, Magnify, Minify, and Substitute - Seeking practical ways of differentiation Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 17
L Please share some practical SPC exercises for training purpose Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
M Practical Reasons Behind The ISO 13485/QSR Regulations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
G Practical Screw Thread Information & Tolerances General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 98
R Practical Problem Solving for Management Development Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 3
D Internal Auditing ? A Practical Approach General Auditing Discussions 4
Anerol C Definition Rework vs. Repair - What's the practical difference? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 43
ScottK How far is it practical to take a Process FMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 14
L Practical Ideas for TS 6.2.2.4 - Personel are aware of the relevance and importance.. Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 5
M Stakeholder Analysis - Practical success stories wanted ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
J Q Leading and Lagging Indicators - Difference (practical) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Z Design and Development Planning - Is It Sufficient and Practical or Not Design and Development of Products and Processes 0
C Interpretation and Practical Application of ISO 17025 - Development of a System ISO 17025 related Discussions 81
G Practical examples of VOC and CTQ flowdown Six Sigma 8
D What practical measures can be taken to improve customer satisfaction? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 21
Govind Here is a Practical Test for QMS Effectiveness ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
I ISO 13485 Practical Internal Audit Checklist - Standard vs. Process Based Internal Auditing 26
S I need help creating a practical preventive action process ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
J Auditing to ISO 9001:2000 - What is the Process Model in PRACTICAL terms General Auditing Discussions 17

Similar threads

Top Bottom