Precontrol and Process Capability - CNC Lathes that run small batches - Short Runs

S

Steven Sulkin

#1
Trying to determine what type of control chart to apply...

We two CNC Lathes that run small batches. These batches may be of different material and configurations which require setups between runs. There is a lot of variation between runs (due to setups) and very little variation within runs (variation in lathe).

I would appreciate a recommendation. If you successfully implemented SPC in this circumstance an example would also be appreciated.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Roger Eastin

#2
We had a similar situation and used some of the "short-run" SPC techniques to help us. It requires, among other things, to know the sigma of each "within set-up" run. By normalizing the "gross sigma" for the process, you can have one set of modified control limits for each NC machine. This technique allows you to focus on the machine and not just the part that you are fabricating. We used this technique years back and it worked. You do lose some resolution on the control limits, but we found that the gains outweighed the loss due to resolution. Anyway, check out some books on this topic in the ASQ Publications catalogue.
 
D

Don Winton

#3
Trying to determine what type of control chart to apply
I am not sure I can help here. Control chart applications are very dependent on usage. It sounds as if your chart is varying across setups, but I need more details.

There are some alternatives to the traditional control chart in this type (small run) which may be of help. Under the assumption that each run is different, you may want to look at a pre-control type of technique.

Perhaps I could be more help if additional details were provided. Or, perhaps someone else has had this experience. Personally, I have found control charts for short runs rather, in a word, lacking.

Regards,
Don

------------------
Just the ramblings of an Old Wizard Warrior.
 
D
#4
precontrol and process capability

Are there any statistical formulas that relate precontrol data to process capability indices?
 
D

D.Scott

#5
dmac - I am not sure this is what you are looking for but here it is anyway for what it is worth.

To establish a pre-control chart, it must be assumed that the process is normally distributed with a Cpk of at least 1.0. It can then be statistically shown that 86% of the product will be within the control lines with 7% in each of the other sections.

As there is no statistical data taken or analyzed, it is important to only use pre-control on a process known to be stable.

I am sure there are others who can add a lot to this but at least it may help to get you started.

Dave
 
M

MSAFAI

#6
1- Check normality by using a Histogram of your data.

2- You can have a ROUGH estimate of process capability by taking standard deviation of your data and calculating Ppk.

3- I don't know to what extent you can rely on the above calculation, because using a Pre-control chart you cannot be sure your process is under control (a prerequisit to determining capability)

Any other ideas?

MSAFAI
 
C

Chemman

#8
Steve: We two CNC Lathes that run small batches. These batches may be of different material and configurations which require setups between runs. There is a lot of variation between runs (due to setups) and very little variation within runs (variation in lathe).

I have a similar problem, but unable to use any SPC that I know of. We take a batch of material, mold it, cure it in an oven under clamped pressure, grind it, scorch it, then take 5 pcs/batch (batch = approx 3000 parts) and do various physical tests on it. SPC is not done on the process, but the end result of these operations.
So for example, the density of the part is measured per batch as a subgroup. This charateristic is affected by every operation above beginning with the material batch, potentially processed on 1 of 3 presses, through 1 of 6 ovens, 4 clamping stations,etc. It is not possible to keep these separate and plot individually. Each control chart subgroup is from a different batch of material and off a multitude of processes and equipment.

Limits are very tight from Rbar, which makes the charts look terrible from subgroup to subgroup variation, but still very controlled compared to the specifications. This is hard to explain to vistors that do not understand the complexity of the problem.

To me, it seems that these could be considered different setups, processes, or population just as you would expect a mean shift for a different lot of steel in a fineblank press.

When things appear to go out of control, there is not much you can do to react to the problem. There is no adjustment at this point in the process because the parts are already made. Because this happens very frequently and because of the huge number of influencing factors, you can't investigate everything and record the reaction as required for OUC conditions. Some real assignable causes can be determined after a week or two if your lucky, others are just ellusive despite DOE after DOE. I have began to think that this level of variation is normal, little more can be done to improve it, and that a lot of my problem is the use of control charts that shouldn't be applied to this situation. I think standard Xbar & R charts are inappropriate here. Anyone agree or am I out in left field?

Thanks,
Chemman
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#9
When Does Pre-Control Make Sense?

D.Scott said:

dmac - I am not sure this is what you are looking for but here it is anyway for what it is worth.

To establish a pre-control chart, it must be assumed that the process is normally distributed with a Cpk of at least 1.0. It can then be statistically shown that 86% of the product will be within the control lines with 7% in each of the other sections.

As there is no statistical data taken or analyzed, it is important to only use pre-control on a process known to be stable.

I am sure there are others who can add a lot to this but at least it may help to get you started.

Dave
So.... Under what circumstances does pre-control make sense?
 
R

Ravi Khare

#10
D.Scott said:

dmac - I am not sure this is what you are looking for but here it is anyway for what it is worth.

To establish a pre-control chart, it must be assumed that the process is normally distributed with a Cpk of at least 1.0. It can then be statistically shown that 86% of the product will be within the control lines with 7% in each of the other sections.

As there is no statistical data taken or analyzed, it is important to only use pre-control on a process known to be stable.

I am sure there are others who can add a lot to this but at least it may help to get you started.

Dave
I thought I had read somewhere that precontrol does not assume normality, and is free of distribution shape.... I can't recollect the source, so I may just be wrong!

Offcourse if normality was not assumed there would be no estimates of the Alfa and Beta errors.

Has anyone else come across this reference of Precontrol being free of the normality assumption?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Precontrol Charts for unilateral tolerances on 'new' processes Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 23
M Precontrol - What if two points are exactly on the limit? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
T SPC for Improvement? (was PreControl) SPC is great for stability! Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
D SPC for Short Runs (Control Limits) vs. Precontrol charts (Specification Limits) Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
D ECO (Engineering Change Order) process questions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
S Sterilization validation after changing sterilization process provider Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
Pau Calvo Quality Management process is mandatory in ISO9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
Tagin Template or Checklist for Process Change Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
LostLouie Manufacturer divorced from Design process, is he justified in design process deficiencies? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
J 1.11 Preliminary Identification of Special Product and Process Characteristics APQP and PPAP 4
D Question regarding customer feedback process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
T What does AS9100 mean when it says you must establish a process to do X? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 24
J Process FMEA Template with examples - Cold and Hot Forged components FMEA and Control Plans 4
D Questions regarding process validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Question regarding ECO process, specifically for Life Science products and defining form fit and function ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
P Managing How PPAP Requirements are Communicated in the Manufacturing Process and to Suppliers APQP and PPAP 5
I Control Plan (Product/Process specification/ Tolerance) acceptance FMEA and Control Plans 27
L Process changes and biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
A Validation of Forced Aeration Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Error Proofing Label process Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
B New Release of CQI-12 Coatings Process (Revision 3- Release date- 7/2020) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
D Layered Process Audits - FCA 9.2.2 - Exemption Clause? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
B ISO 11607-2 "Critical Parameter" vs. "Process Parameter" Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
Q Example Process orientation to the process leadership, management, goals (tasks of the top management) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S Process Inspection -Sub assembly process inspection sheet Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 3
T ISO 13485 8.3 - Non-Conforming Materials - on-line rework or part of process? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
T Outsourced process in ISO 45001 Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
L Manufacturing Process Audit Help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
T Formal Q Self Assessment - Problem with assigning Product and Process Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
K Problems with process equipment ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
W Need for current design or process control FMEA and Control Plans 2
M Hiring Decisions - How much effort do you put into the hiring process these days? (7/2020) Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 6
hockeyhead Existing process never included in AS9100 scope of certification AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
A What is the difference between Design Process, Process Design and Design Control? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
V Process, component or full product re-qualification: leaded to unleaded solder Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 8
C Refreshing an old and boring topic - Job descriptions and Roles vs Process Documentation ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 38
R Where does IATF 16949 address Process mapping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
C OEE and In-process Inspection Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
S Effective nonconforming process for AS9100 8.7 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
T ISO 13485 - Process validation at critical suppliers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
K Software Validation for Measurement Tools used in Process Validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J Sub-supplier change from manual to automated process - same specs - Report to FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
P Design verification driven by new equipment. How is this different than process validation? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
I Release checklist EO sterilization process Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
V Informational SMMT IATF Oversight - OEM KPI Process IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M Description of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.3 manufacturing process audit- needs your feedback IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
T Design Control Procedures later in the Development Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Process Mapping - Inputs/Outputs/Detail Activities/Control points/Measurement? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom