R
Ric Schuster
Greeting all. Let me first say that this is a wonderful place to find a great deal of valuable information. From what I have read over the past week or so, there is a very large knowledge base here just waiting to be tapped. That being said, I've searched the forums and the web quite extensively and cannot seem to find any help for my issue at hand.
I'm currently working for a very large (8000+ employees) company with multiple plants and site locations. The Quality department alone is nearly as large as the entire plant where I previously worked and is responsible for company-wide processes and procedures. One of my current assignments is to design a program to identify and process Preventive Actions. We have a good procedure that clearly defines how the CAPA process works, is administered and tracked, but like everywhere else I have looked it does not specifically explain how a potential PA is identified and initiated (CAs are pretty cut-and-dried). This was not much of a problem in my last job because the operation was small and everything went through me (as QA Manager), and in most cases I was the one pushing folks for PA ideas. The shear scale of the operation here makes this manner of initiation impossible.
I'm good with the process of initiating PAs from FMEAs (the team and/or responsible person for the FMEA will initiate) and internal audits (the auditor is responsible for initiating CARs for findings and PAs for OFIs). I'm struggling with Management Review and other negative trend-type data. It's easy to say that this type of data will be reviewed and PAs will be initiated when negative trends are observed, but who will do the initiating? Experience has taught me that unless specific responsibilities are assigned, very little will actually happen, especially when it comes to preventive actions, and even then it takes the QA folks to push for documentation.
How is this process clearly defined in other larger companies and operations out there where there are multiple layers of management? Does anyone else have more "meat" to their procedures other than "...PAs will be inititated for the following reasons..."? My boss is looking to bechmark other companies and implement best-practices, but so far I have not found anyone else having a process defined in any more detail than we currently have. Your suggestions and ideas would be greatly appreciated.
I'm currently working for a very large (8000+ employees) company with multiple plants and site locations. The Quality department alone is nearly as large as the entire plant where I previously worked and is responsible for company-wide processes and procedures. One of my current assignments is to design a program to identify and process Preventive Actions. We have a good procedure that clearly defines how the CAPA process works, is administered and tracked, but like everywhere else I have looked it does not specifically explain how a potential PA is identified and initiated (CAs are pretty cut-and-dried). This was not much of a problem in my last job because the operation was small and everything went through me (as QA Manager), and in most cases I was the one pushing folks for PA ideas. The shear scale of the operation here makes this manner of initiation impossible.
I'm good with the process of initiating PAs from FMEAs (the team and/or responsible person for the FMEA will initiate) and internal audits (the auditor is responsible for initiating CARs for findings and PAs for OFIs). I'm struggling with Management Review and other negative trend-type data. It's easy to say that this type of data will be reviewed and PAs will be initiated when negative trends are observed, but who will do the initiating? Experience has taught me that unless specific responsibilities are assigned, very little will actually happen, especially when it comes to preventive actions, and even then it takes the QA folks to push for documentation.
How is this process clearly defined in other larger companies and operations out there where there are multiple layers of management? Does anyone else have more "meat" to their procedures other than "...PAs will be inititated for the following reasons..."? My boss is looking to bechmark other companies and implement best-practices, but so far I have not found anyone else having a process defined in any more detail than we currently have. Your suggestions and ideas would be greatly appreciated.