B
Noooooo!!!!
Hi Rajeeva,
Sorry to keep restating this, but No.3 in your example is NOT preventive action - it is CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPACT.
Preventive action can ONLY be taken to prevent something which has NOT YET HAPPENED! All 3 of the steps you define are done in relation to an ACTUAL NONCONFORMITY. This means they are all part of CORRECTIVE ACTION.
Here are the relevant clauses (from TS16949):
8.5.2 Corrective action
The organization shall take action to eliminate the cause of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities encountered. A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for
a) reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints),
b) determining the causes of nonconformities,
c) evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur,
d) determining and implementing action needed,
e) records of the results of action taken (see 4.2.4), and
f) reviewing corrective action taken.
8.5.2.3 Corrective action impact
The organization shall apply to other similar processes and products the corrective action, and controls implemented, to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity.
8.5.3 Preventive action
The organization shall determine action to eliminate the causes of potential nonconformities in order to prevent their occurrence. Preventive actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the potential problems.
A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for
a) determining potential nonconformities and their causes,
b) evaluating the need for action to prevent occurrence of nonconformities,
c) determining and implementing action needed,
d) records of results of action taken (see 4.2.4), and
e) reviewing preventive action taken.
Here are some definitions - note the final statement, which I cannot stress enough. "Preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence whereas corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence.":
Correction (ISO9000:2000 3.6.6)
Action to eliminate a detected nonconformity. A correction can be made in conjunction with a corrective action. A correction can be, for example, rework or regrade.
Corrective Action (ISO9000:2000 3.6.5)
Action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other undesirable situation. There can be more than one cause for a nonconformity. Corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence whereas preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence. There is a distinction between correction and corrective action.
Corrective Action Impact (ISO TS 16949:2002 8.5.2.3)
Application of corrective action to other similar processes and products to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity.
Preventive Action (ISO9000:2000 3.6.4)
Action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other undesirable potential situation. There can be more than one cause for a potential nonconformity. Preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence whereas corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence.
Hi Rajeeva,
Sorry to keep restating this, but No.3 in your example is NOT preventive action - it is CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPACT.
Preventive action can ONLY be taken to prevent something which has NOT YET HAPPENED! All 3 of the steps you define are done in relation to an ACTUAL NONCONFORMITY. This means they are all part of CORRECTIVE ACTION.
Here are the relevant clauses (from TS16949):
8.5.2 Corrective action
The organization shall take action to eliminate the cause of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities encountered. A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for
a) reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints),
b) determining the causes of nonconformities,
c) evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur,
d) determining and implementing action needed,
e) records of the results of action taken (see 4.2.4), and
f) reviewing corrective action taken.
8.5.2.3 Corrective action impact
The organization shall apply to other similar processes and products the corrective action, and controls implemented, to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity.
8.5.3 Preventive action
The organization shall determine action to eliminate the causes of potential nonconformities in order to prevent their occurrence. Preventive actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the potential problems.
A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for
a) determining potential nonconformities and their causes,
b) evaluating the need for action to prevent occurrence of nonconformities,
c) determining and implementing action needed,
d) records of results of action taken (see 4.2.4), and
e) reviewing preventive action taken.
Here are some definitions - note the final statement, which I cannot stress enough. "Preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence whereas corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence.":
Correction (ISO9000:2000 3.6.6)
Action to eliminate a detected nonconformity. A correction can be made in conjunction with a corrective action. A correction can be, for example, rework or regrade.
Corrective Action (ISO9000:2000 3.6.5)
Action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other undesirable situation. There can be more than one cause for a nonconformity. Corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence whereas preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence. There is a distinction between correction and corrective action.
Corrective Action Impact (ISO TS 16949:2002 8.5.2.3)
Application of corrective action to other similar processes and products to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity.
Preventive Action (ISO9000:2000 3.6.4)
Action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other undesirable potential situation. There can be more than one cause for a potential nonconformity. Preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence whereas corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence.