D
Hello,
I am currently using the AQL system for my work but I think there is a problem with this system.
This system gives acceptance or rejection thresholds for major and minor defects but sometimes it can lead to an incherence.
Let me explain this problem with an exemple:
If we have for instance:
-Minor defects: acceptance 7, rejection 8
-Major defects: acceptance 2, rejection 3
If we find 8 minor defects and 0 major defects we reject the production.
If we find 7 minor defects and 1 or even 2 major defects we accept de production.
I think this is a real problem because the second case is more serious than the first one and we accept it while we reject the first one.
The proof of this problem is that we can easily put in order the different cases bellow, from de least serious to the most serious:
8 minor defects and 0 major defects < 7 minor defects and 1 major defect < 7 minor defects and 2 major defects.
Can someone help me to understand why AQL works like that?
Thanks a lot.
Damien
I am currently using the AQL system for my work but I think there is a problem with this system.
This system gives acceptance or rejection thresholds for major and minor defects but sometimes it can lead to an incherence.
Let me explain this problem with an exemple:
If we have for instance:
-Minor defects: acceptance 7, rejection 8
-Major defects: acceptance 2, rejection 3
If we find 8 minor defects and 0 major defects we reject the production.
If we find 7 minor defects and 1 or even 2 major defects we accept de production.
I think this is a real problem because the second case is more serious than the first one and we accept it while we reject the first one.
The proof of this problem is that we can easily put in order the different cases bellow, from de least serious to the most serious:
8 minor defects and 0 major defects < 7 minor defects and 1 major defect < 7 minor defects and 2 major defects.
Can someone help me to understand why AQL works like that?
Thanks a lot.
Damien