Process Approach - Take 2 - Process Management vs. Function Management

D

David Mullins

#1
Process Approach - Take 2.

Not trying to re-kindle any fires here, but many contributors confessed to having epiphanies about process management versus function management.

Here's a scenario:
Quality manager No.1 is developing a Quality Management System (QMS) and opts to structure the documentation in a traditional pyramid.

Quality manager No.2 is also developing a QMS and decides that a traditional document pyramid is not suitable for a process management focused organisation. Is there a QMS documentation structure that is better suited to the continuous improvement model (PDSA/PDCA/ Ishikawa Circle/Deming Wheel/ Shewart cycle), as per the ISO9001:2000 model?

Since 9001:2000 supposedly provides a process structure, then presumably each process (an acticity using resources, and managed in order to enable the transformation of inputs into outputs) consists of management responsibility, resource management, product realisation and measurement, analysis and improvement. And the 'process approach' is "the application of a system of processes within an organisation, together with the identification and interactions of these processes, and their management". Then the first step in 9001:2000 is defining your processes?

So it would follow that the most logical way to implement 9001:2000 is to identify your processes and flowchart them, listing critical resources, responsibilities and measurements.
Then add the mandatory 6 procedures and you have everything, yes?

Back to my earlier question, if the document pyramid doesn't suit the process aproach, what structure does (and it must be clear for the user to follow/find items)?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
C

Chris May

#2
Processes

Dave,

I tend to agree with you on the pyramid approach not suiting a process defined QMS.

What I am doing, IS defining critical processes and then trying to map the whole business "process" from receipt of order to final shipment.
I plan to get a few "knowledgable" people, one from each key process, go into a room with a bag of post-its and then from left-to-right, map out the business on the wall. This will take time and the room might not be big enough, in which case, bite sized chunks will do.

My procedures are going from texty tombs, (do people read these ?? of course they do.....), to flowcharts done in Visio.
Top-to-bottom flow chart on the left of the sheet, responsibilities in the middle adjacent to appropriate element and timescale/TAT on the right. People like these.

So for me, the pyramid approach is useless. It tends to leave holes and you lose sight of connectivity...every output from somewhere is an input somewhere else.....not easy to see in a tiered system.

At least doing a top level business flow diagram you can graphically spot gaps.

Also, getting the various clans involved, you can have a nice debate about, "Yeah, thats what we do....but (moves post-it)...how about this ??

Simple but effective.

Hope this helps

Regards,

Chris May
 
M

M Greenaway

#3
I would say that the traditional documentation pyramid is defunct under ISO9001:2000. The level 1 document (quality manual) no longer has to adress the requirements of the standard, level 2 documents (procedures) are no longer mandated - apart from 6, and as for level 3 (work instructions) or level 4 (forms, etc) these were never mandated in ISO9000 anyway.

If the management system documentation is not written around the processes how can we show that we are managing these activities as processes ?
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#4
I'm not sure that I would say that the pyrimid is defunct, obsolete, antiquated, whatever....You still need to have a quality manual, procedures, records etc. I think that the pyrimid structure is still there, it is maybe turned on its side? so to speak.

I think that we now see the level 2 procedures differently than we used to. Even though the standard does not say we have to have 19 or twenty procedures anymore, we still need to look at the processes and sub-processes and I think most folks will document these in a flow-chart, process map, or written description (or some combination). Personally, I think that the pyrimid is just going to get morphed a bit, maybe to a more diamond shape. You'll have your level 1 at the top, but your level 2 will be a broader more encompassing level than in the past. I see our work instructions or level 3 continuing the pyrimid shape but maybe not at a continuous angle, and our records are actually shrinking back somewhat due to our efforts in providing continuity within the process and using one form to document several things (oh the joys of computers!) the number of over-all "fields" to be completed, but we have fewer records.

Am I making sense? Sometimes it is hard to verbalize visual concepts!
 

Mike S.

Happy to be Alive
Trusted Information Resource
#5
Originally posted by SteelMaiden
I'm not sure that I would say that the pyrimid is defunct, obsolete, antiquated, whatever....You still need to have a quality manual, procedures, records etc. I think that the pyrimid structure is still there, it is maybe turned on its side? so to speak.
Wow, I sure do learn alot in this forum! And I have alot to learn it seems. IMHO I think SteelMaiden's note makes a heck of alot of sense. Our company is still 9001-1994 based (don't ask) but as I read more about 9000-2000 and think of applying it in the future I can "see" this approach (a documentation diamond) in my mind as reasonable. Maybe because I'm still in 1994-land, but it seems easier for me to understand.

"Seeing" the 2000 "process approach" in my mind is much harder than "seeing" the 1994 20-section approach, and I'm not sure it is ALL due to familiarity. But, when we're talking about MY mind, we're not talking Mensa material, either.
:confused:

Mike
 
J

James Gutherson

#6
It depends on what you're looking at.

I think that it really depends on what you're looking at.

(I'm going to try to describe this because I'm still working on drawing it for everyone)
If I'm looking at the interrelationships of the processess, then I tend to think of a series of arrows in parallel, being our main products. Along these arrows are boxes being the major steps in producing these products. A bit like the Key Processes given by Jim Wade.
Then surronding these arrows is a 'cloud' of support procedures, again like the one described by Jim.

BUT, If I'm looking purly at the documentation, then the Pyramid fits fine. The Intranet Site which describes our business and provides links to the documented procedures (Quality Manual), the documented procedures then sitting below that, then the Forms and records to support the procedures below that again.

The documentation is not the system, therefore there is no reason why the Pyramid needs to be thrown out in a Process Based approach.
 
M

Michael Christie

#8
I like this thread.

Like the rest of you, I have been noticing that the triangle seems to have lost it's place. I find that my QM in places takes on the job of the level 2's and my level 2's in places also combine level 3 instructions. It just seems natural, once one starts cutting across boundaries and looking at the process instead of functions. Well, O.K. some of my procedures seem to still be function-oriented....

I haven't found a different model that is of any use, and I am just winging it, which is what I like to do best, anyhow. I figure that if my work improves the company's health, becomes something that will live after I am gone, and makes the auditor smile, that is what counts.

Maybe it is time for the triangle to exit stage left. Just like functions and departments. Shift those paradigms!!!
 

WALLACE

Quite Involved in Discussions
#9
Exit the triangle?

Lucinda,
I like your pic that describes your QM documentation. I have been experimenting with the use of Mindmaps as a form of communicating processes that are integral to QMS. I start by printing the idea or subject in the page centre (Landscape format) and radiating outwards from the subject, I attach with arrows the processes and sub-processes that are part of the QMS, I have found this to be a very effective form of communicating in general as, I have experienced that almost everyone who uses this form of mapping tends to have more effective communication of subjects as, It seems that radiant thinking (Processing) is more natural.
Wallace.:bigwave:
 
M

Michael Christie

#10
And just when you thought you knew everything.......

I confess, I had to go look up mind-mapping on the web. Looks like a pretty good idea. Thanks!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
qualprod Shortening processes complying with process approach ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
tony s What is the automotive process approach for auditing? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M APQC PCF (Process Classification Framework) and ISO 9001 - Processes Based Approach ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
C Does Japan accept the Bracketing Approach for Process Validation Japan Medical Device Regulations 1
A How do we implement a Process Approach ISO 13485:2016 - Existing GMP QMS Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
P System Audit Approach - Application of VDA 6.3 - Process Auditing VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 2
B How do you approach the "Safe Launch" Process APQP and PPAP 17
M Process Approach: Types & number of processes required? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
WCHorn Quality Digest article on the Process Approach to ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
W Help explaining the need for the Process Approach AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
Q Introducing Process based approach on Production Floor Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
K How Can I Implement the Process Approach in AS9100C AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
Y What is a Process Approach Audit? Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 8
G The future of the Process Approach to Auditing General Auditing Discussions 10
Q Process Approach & Continual Improvement Clauses and Evidence of its Effective Use ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
M PFMEA (Process FMEA) - What is the best approach? FMEA and Control Plans 14
Q Process or Departments - Document Content and Managing the Process Approach ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
I Process Approach Litmus Test - Procedure Titles ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
B Process Approach - Convert System of Documentation into System of Managed Processes Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
L Consultant not following Process Approach ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 34
J Why Process Approach? Why not Process Method? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
B Process Approach to Auditing Quality Management System Internal Auditing 12
Q ISO 13485, ISO 9001 QMS and FDA Requirements - Process vs. Compliance Approach? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Q Process Approach - Special Focus? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Marc Process Approach Challenge - Please Define what the 'Process Approach' is Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 48
I Poll: Should auditors promote the process approach? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 331
Howard Atkins Process Approach Requirement for Internal Audits in TS 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 46
A Process approach to auditing ISO 9001:1994 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A A macro-process structure approach to auditing for ISO 9001:2000(8) General Auditing Discussions 19
K FMEA is the Best C.I approach for process improvement? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 3
A Can the Process Approach be used to audit Management Commitment and how? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 31
A Systematic history of process approach Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 5
P Process Approach - Implementing ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
apestate Is the Process Approach optional? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
D Calculating Cpk for Tubing Wall Thickness - Extrusion Process - How to approach? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 16
A Process Approach to Auditing Undocumented Processes at the System Level Internal Auditing 7
W What is meant by Process Approach Auditing and What questions should be asked? Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 11
U Process based Audit Approach vs. Clause based Audit Approach Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 49
Anerol C Process Approach Training Material ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
W Process approach - Auditor issued OFI (opportunity for improvement) on clause 8.2.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
O Training on ISO9001 Process Approach Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 13
P What is the Process Approach in Payroll? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
T Implementing the Process Based Approach - Reality check needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
B Process Approach Audit Plan - What a Process Approach Audit Plan Looks Like Internal Auditing 19
H Process Approach - Apply it into the system procedure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
M Supply and Delivery - How should I approach the work for a specific process ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
T QSE basics and QMS process audit approach - What are the QSE basics? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
V Process approach based internal auditing Internal Auditing 1
Crusader Process Approach beef - Registrar says that we 'should' use the process approach General Auditing Discussions 20
S Automotive Process Approach Auditing sanctioned interpretations S1 04 04 General Auditing Discussions 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom