Process capability or Process control - Which comes first?

J

jrubio

#11
Tim.

Is not the same Stability than Statical Control.

Stability: Your sigma is changing

Under Statical Control Process: your distribution is known and the formulas are previously calculated: Average, Sigma.

i.e Gauss.

Average=1/2PiSigma*Exp(.....
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

jrubio

#12
jrubio said:
Tim I disagree

Ppk is the capability when the process is not stable. Please Refer to
PPAP Manual page 7 Third Edition.

When the process becomes stable the index must be Cpk.

Please read page 7

I will translate exactly the sentence, May be I am wrong.

Sorry for My English is getting worse.

"It can be calculated the Cpk index if the process is stable, PPk it should be used for a process Chronic unstable but with a result that meet specification"
 
J

jrubio

#13
Tim Folkerts said:
I was thinking specifically about statistical process control when I was saying "control". As you note, it can also be used to mean the checks that are in place, as in "document control" or "control of non-conforming products".

Tim F
If you mean statistical process control, I agree but take care that you can control your process without Statical modes.

i.e Oil Temperature less that 40ºC

It does not matter the distribution of points if less than 40 the process is controlled.


You can also control it via Atribute mode.

i.e If the red-cross is located in that point the process is controlled.
 
J

jrubio

#14
jrubio said:
I will translate exactly the sentence, May be I am wrong.

Sorry for My English is getting worse.

"It can be calculated the Cpk index if the process is stable, PPk it should be used for a process Chronic unstable but with a result that meet specification"

Example.

1) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma=3 ppk1=2.1
2) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma=2.9 ppk2=2.3
3) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma=2 ppk3= 2


ppk due to the Capability is changing, Not Stable,
...

17) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1 ppk97=2
18) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1 Cp1=2
19) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1.01 Cp2=2.1
20) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1.01 Cp2=2.1

Now Stable finished.

Total = 100 parts.


The only serious doubt I really have is the minimumn number of points needed to say than a distribution is normal, 5, 10 ??????
 
J

jrubio

#16
Then because if the singular samples (Lets say 5) fit a distribution normal, if you add all the points (20 shifts) total 100 points and make the Histogram the points follow also a normal distribution by one Statical Theorema.

That´s why in Delphi templete the 100 samples is map in a Histogram. Obviously is the total parts do not follow the normal distribution some of th shift are not following the normal.
 
J

jrubio

#17
The only serious doubt I really have is the minimumn number of points needed to say than a distribution is normal, 5, 10 ??????[/QUOTE]

I woud say 5.

3 not althugh the Gaus is simetric,
5 in order to see the Kurtosis.

But in fact I can not proof.
 
J

jrubio

#18
jrubio said:
Example.

1) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma=3 ppk1=2.1
2) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma=2.9 ppk2=2.3
3) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma=2 ppk3= 2


17) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1 ppk17=2


ppk due to the Capability is changing, Not Stable,

You can calculalate now the Long term Capability PPk for all the 17*5 parts
...


18) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1 Cp1=2
19) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1.01 Cp2=2
20) 5 parts Av=2 Sigma= 1.01 Cp2=2

Now Stable finished. You can calculate the Cpk for all the 3*5=15 parts.

Total = 100 parts.


Also it can be calculated the capability for all the points 100 but it will be worst that in really fact is, But I think no problem due to meet spec.

QUOTE]
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#19
jrubio said:
Tim I disagree

Ppk is the capability when the process is not stable. Please Refer to
PPAP Manual page 7 Third Edition.

When the process becomes stable the index must be Cpk.
Well, the AIAG methods don't always line up with what the rest of industry does...so the use of Cpk and Ppk for Automotive and for everyone else is different. that cases a LOT of undue confusion.
But, a long long time ago I understood this so my memory might not be correct and I no longer have the AIAG manuals (thank what deity you believe in - or not) but I'll take a shot the Ppk for unstable processes: I THINK I REMEMBER that the comment you refer to is that if you have a process that is in fact in statistical control then it must have a Cpk of 1.33. If your process is NOT in statistical control then it must have a Ppk of 1.5 (or higher, I don't remember the exact numbers).
Please note that I may have remembered this incorrectly adn I certainly don't endorse it. (In past posts I have stated my belif that all capability indices should be eliminated.)
 
J

jrubio

#20
Bev D said:
Well, the AIAG methods don't always line up with what the rest of industry does...so the use of Cpk and Ppk for Automotive and for everyone else is different. that cases a LOT of undue confusion.
But, a long long time ago I understood this so my memory might not be correct and I no longer have the AIAG manuals (thank what deity you believe in - or not) but I'll take a shot the Ppk for unstable processes: I THINK I REMEMBER that the comment you refer to is that if you have a process that is in fact in statistical control then it must have a Cpk of 1.33. If your process is NOT in statistical control then it must have a Ppk of 1.5 (or higher, I don't remember the exact numbers).
Please note that I may have remembered this incorrectly adn I certainly don't endorse it. (In past posts I have stated my belif that all capability indices should be eliminated.)
In fact what Customer would Require is the estimated ppms in terms of probability,

Cpk=1.67 I think it was 0.03ppm

It can be deducted the formula

Ppm= P (LT>Normal(Av,Sigma)>UT)/10^6
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Two excellent examples of process capability analysis from Quality Magazine Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5
M Measuring Capability of Process with Multiple Specifications Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
L How to evaluate the process capability of a data set that is non-normal (cannot be transformed and does not fit any known distribution)? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 12
T Final process capability results - What I am supposed to present? Cp and CpK? APQP and PPAP 11
Q How to perform Process Capability for true position Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
L IATF 16949 Cl. 8.3.3.2 Manufacturing process design input - Process capability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
Y Process Capability for Non-Normal Data - Philosophical Questions Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
M Process Capability in a High Precision Environment Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
V Product Development - When to start calculating Process Capability Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
S Proving Process Capability of a Packing Machine Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
N Process Capability Study - Aggregate vs. Individual Processes Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 24
V Process Capability for parameters with non-normal distribution. Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 16
J Process Capability - How much percentage of tolerance? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 3
S Regression Control Chart - Process Capability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 18
M How to determine Process Capability using Minitab 17 Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
B Process Capability - Changing Limits to Improve Cpk or find Root Causes? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
B Long Term Process Capability from miltiple Machines and Fixtures Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
E What Data do we need for Welding and Repair Process Capability? Six Sigma 1
K Calculating Capability of a process when data is skewed in the upper range Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
S What is the difference between Process Capability and Machine Capabilty Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 13
V How to Assess Process Capability at the Development or Optimization Phase Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
C Minitab Binomial Process Capability Analysis Chart Explanation Using Minitab Software 1
kedarg6500 Sample Size for Short Term & Long Term Process Capability Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
J Is it the same process capability or performance in 8.2.3.1 and SPC? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
E Binomial Process Capability Sample Size - Variables Data Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
M On Subgroups in Control Charts and Process Capability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
N SPC and Process Capability Using a Romer Arm Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
J Interpreting Process Capability results and ratios Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1
J Go or No-Go Process Capability Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
S Process Capability with Negative Exponential Distribution Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
C Process Capability - Attribute Data Analysis (Template) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
C Process Capability - Variables Data Analysis (Template) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
A Cnpk (Non-Parametric Capability Analysis) to assess whether the Process is Stable Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
V Process Capability to reconfirm the Inspection Frequency Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
B Sample Size based on Process Capability Indices (Pp/Ppk)? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 20
P Calculating Process Capability from Data of attached spreadsheet Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
D How to measure Process Capability for Homogeneous Batch Manufacturing Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
A Burrs affecting measurements and Process Capability Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
G Assessing Process Capability on Variation (Hardware Adjustment Mean Shift) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
D Calculating Upper-CL/Lower-CL and Process Capability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
V Defining Subgroups and Importance of Subgroups in SPC and Process Capability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
T Process Capability - Understanding what Process Capability Indices mean Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 17
Q TS 16949 Process Capability Requirements - Cpk ≥ 1.67 on All Key Parameters? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
S Process Capability questions - Calculating Cpu using Minitab Six Sigma 6
C Sample Size Calculation Formula for Process Capability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 25
D Capability Analysis for Packing Process in Food Manufacturing Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 11
Q When to use Cpk or Ppk for a Process Capability Study? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 14
S Process Capability on Basic Dimensions Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 10
D Process Capability Study which involves MMC (Maximum Material Condition) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 8
E Process Capability Analytical Tools Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom