Proliferation of Standards


Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Subject: Re: Q: TL 9000 model /Saarelainen/Naish
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 17:28:19 -0600
From: Moderator <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]

It is my understanding from a meeting I just attended on Thursday that TL9000 is currently in the early stages of implementation. As it is being tried there are changes that are being flushed out of it. It is also my understanding that until February of 2000 you can not get an officially recognized certification to the standard even though there seems to be some misunderstanding regarding this within the Telecom industry as well as outside of it.

Several registrars were chosen by their Telecom clients to participate in the first generation of the training and audits to the standard. These registrars are currently issuing certificates but there are not officially recognizable until February of next year. After the first of the year 2000 a number of other registrars will be trained and will be having witness audits as well.

To Markku's comment about the ISO standard versus the proliferation of other standards that are based on ISO, I believe we have failed to meet the original needs and have now gone to a system which renders ISO in a position of less importance. I agree with Markku that we should drop all the industry specific and go back to one standard but in the real world I know that won't happen. Further I think instead of going that way we are going to go the opposite way of adding more and more standards which become more and more diverse and more and more complicated for companies to implement.

As an example of my last comment, I have one client who sells to automotive (QS), Telecom (TL), the government (DS), some medical which is currently not requiring them to go to CGMP but could in the future, some commercial (ISO), and some people who just don't care. There are some others in the commercial who are electronics or electrical, or some other industry that undoubtedly will come up with their own version of the standards in the next few years for one reason or another.

ISO once met there needs for all their clients. They are now having to add QS and TL and whatever comes along. And each new standard requires a minimum of time to evaluate their current system against the requirements and see where they need to add or change or incorporate for that sector of their business. And then comes the time to make the changes. This takes them back to the days where every new customer wanted to impose their own quality system on them as the supplier. Now we are jsut requiring them to meet the various sector requirements which may have started out as simply an add on to ISO but are quickly becoming a nightmare for a company to keep track of which sector this customer comes from. And in addition, they still have to add on the customer specific requirements as before.

They also now have to pay additional money to ensure their system meets all the standards required by the customers. As we move to Y2K ISO and QS does not stay in line with the changes, I will venture to say that down the line AS, DS, TE, TL, CGMP, and whatever other variations spring up will part ways with ISO and each other causing even more problems in implementation and maintenance and increase the costs for the audits.

One has to ask at what point does a company say "Wait a minute! If you want this registration or compliance we will be happy to do it but you start picking up the costs for it." Or as I supect many will do it is written into their overhead costs and spread across all products and all customers and passed on to us the consumer in the increased cost of goods. I for one would like to see the proliferation stopped and all standards replaced with one called ISO which is correctly implemented and audited for. The cost of my goods will go down and I am sure the quality will not suffer as a result.

QS was suppose to provide a better quality system. The big joke is that the big three frequently don't supply the requirements to their suppliers. And many of who have had cars built by the big three know the quality of our vehicles has not improved (and in some cases has gotten worse). And the auto aftermarket doesn't even have to comply so we the consumer are left with programs costing the suppliers more money which is passed on to us and for which we have yet to see any significant improvement in the products we buy.

And AS and DS seem to be no more productive as evidenced by the increased number of problems showing up in product built for both the commercial world (those planes we ride that seem to be having one recall after another recently) and military (why are so many military planes going down as of late?)

I can't speak for the medical world because I haven't seen any major recalls lately so I don't know if CGMP is buying us anything or not.

So what does QS buy any one? What does AS or DS buy us the consumer or the families of the military personnel being killed? And I have to sometimes question ISO for the same reasons when I see registered companies who continue to put out non conforming materials and products and do not respond to requests for corrective and preventive actions.

This is a multibillion dollar process that leaves us consumers with no more for our money and costing us more each day as the standards proliferate. Where and when will it stop?

Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion The proliferation of Accreditation Bodies in the USA ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 7
S API Spec.Q1 Standards Version in Purchasing Information Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
B Exclusions or justification for non-applicability of IEC standards Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
P Citing EN standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 6
Ed Panek Compliance with Standards? When a standard is updated/revised CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
N Harmonized Standards for MDR Certification EU Medical Device Regulations 7
A Some questions about voluntary consensus standards in traditional 510(k) submission US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
D Imaging/Image Quality Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
R ECG Risk Analysis Standards ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
I Management review in conformity assessment standards - Certification Bodies Management Review Meetings and related Processes 6
Govind Informational ISO COVID-19 response: freely available ISO standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
C Does a CE mark infer meeting all applicable standards? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
T Assessing Hazard-Related Use Scenarios where control measures exist through standards IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 32
Richard Regalado Informational ISO makes available relevant BCMS standards free for online access Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 5
A Technical File - Updating Applied Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 4
A NB (Notified Body) Audit of Standards ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Applicability of new non-harmonized standards (MDD/MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
dgrainger Informational EU published new Harmonised Standards List for the Directives (25/3/2020) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
P Static Electricity/Pacemaker - Standards for static electricity generation CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
M Referencing Harmonised Standards in Declarations of Conformity EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Pmarszal External Standards and Regulations Management Process Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S IVF medical devices standards and test methods Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
M What are the standards for malls management? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
A Complaint alert levels - Industry standards pertaining to alert levels for complaints Customer Complaints 5
R MDR standards - which standards to comply with ? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Why does Official Journal list superseded standards? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M MDR "Common Specifications" (CS) - If not standards, then what? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
L In house calibration - Our CMM's are outside certified can I use them to certify our standards General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
F AS9100D, raw material standards are a requirement for manufacturing? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
S Industry Labelling Standards - non medical Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
J Medical device related standards or regulations - Disposed records log ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S How many mandays required for the below mentioned standards IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
M Standards Subscription Service and Standards Tracking Service Pros and Cons? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
P European versions of standards - ISO 10993-1 and ISO 11607-1 EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Q Interpreting China Medical Device regulations/standards China Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational US FDA – Modifications to the List of Recognized Standards, Recognition List Number: 052 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M EMC Directive and product safety standards CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
M Referenced Standards and/or "State of the Art"? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
Sidney Vianna Informational List of ISO Management System Standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
C How medical device manufacturers are implementing standards like GDPR and HIPAA Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
R Rationale for changes to ISO Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
D IEC EN 61326 Dated Standards - Dated standards for test protocols CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
M Microbiological Testing Lab - Layout & Standards Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
M Different procedure templates for different standards - We have two different management systems ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
DuncanGibbons Are there aerospace standards for the development and manufacture of euipment and tools? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
W ISO standards /Social Audit Franchise (Accredited & Non Accredited) Service Industry Specific Topics 7
S How to consider the relevant standards during development of ISO13482:2016 for IVD manufacturing Blood grouping Other Medical Device Related Standards 6
S Standards for real time stability for medical devices Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
S Mammography standards or regulations for radiology software (no hardware)? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 0
E Standards Management Tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom