Proper Amount of Data Points for Cpk

#1
Hello all,
I haven't posted much on here, but I do read a ton of the content on the site. I love it, and it has come in handy often in my career. So a brief kudos to those who take the time to answer so many questions and add tons of value to the site. Thank you.

On to my question, I am currently a Quality supervisor at a manufacturing facility and have been in debate with the Engineering Manager about how many samples should be used to form a good Cpk.

Our customer requires a 100 percent inspection on multiple features and wants to see a good Cpk on those dimensions before lifting that requirement. What we are attempting to do is to use data that has been collected throughout 2013 and show a Cpk. My Concern is that the Engineering Manager would like to use a 30piece sample from data collected over 7 manufacturing runs (each run using multiple lots of material). Using his idea, we would collect about 4+ parts per manufacturing run and use this to establish a Cpk. While the Cpk may look ok, I don't feel comfortable that this Cpk would show the true story behind our process. Also, our production has ramped up significantly half way through the year (Manufacturing runs that are approximately 18x greater in quantity). I don't want to come off as accusing, but at times it seems like as long as a Cpk number can be created not much thought is put into its accuracy. (also, the conversation about why the Engineering Manger is so heavily involved in this process or where the Quality Manager is in all this will have to be for another day :bonk::bonk: )

I'm curious if anyone has any input as to what would be the best route to calculate an accurate Cpk? Also, is this where something like confidence intervals would help me make the case that the sample size should be much greater?

Thank you!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

TWA - not the airline

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Do you or the engineering Manager know something about the variability of your process/results? I.e. what is the cause of variation (material lots, operators, equipment ...) and how much does the run-to-run variation, the intra-run variation and the trend contribute to the overall variability? That would help to define the right sampling approach and to defend/sell this to your customer. It would also give you a hint where you could improve...Also maybe your customer has his own expectations that you could find out beforehand. And: If you want to use historical data why can't you just use it all?
 
S

Sean Kelley

#3
Can you do a study of all the data and compare to the data he wants to use/ If you can show a difference then this better warrants the discussion and right now it would seem you don't know what that diffence may or may not be. There may not be a relevant difference but almost always more data is better or a longer time. This yields a better picture of the process unless some changes were made that could skew the same data.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
If you have the historical data use it. all of it.
plot it in time series (multi-vari) and then a control chart (the multi-vari will help you determine the rational subgrouping.

if you've incapable periods (excursions) and you can explain hwo you detected them and the preventive corrective actions and control you put in place you can report the CPk for the current (improved) process. This is actually what your Customer wants. Since they know you are doing 100% inspection, using some arbitrary sample will look funny to them. and it is helpful to you: you can develop an sample plan that makes sense and doesn't leave you with escapes that you must explain to the Customer with a possibility of getting bounced back to 100% inspection.
 
C

Curtis317

#5
:2cents: Use 5 samples or more per manufacturing lot. Then do this for more than 7 manufacturing runs. At least 10 manufacturing runs, ideally 30 runs. This way you get "current" data. Using history may be good but it is what you did in the past and may not represent what you are currently doing. However measuring 100% of a part could be very taxing. So it may be best to work it out with your customer.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
I'm curious if anyone has any input as to what would be the best route to calculate an accurate Cpk? Also, is this where something like confidence intervals would help me make the case that the sample size should be much greater?
First, I would tie back to Dr Shewhart's writings on SPC that stated do not declare a process stable unless you have 25 sets of 4 data values. Stability needs to be part of the requirement to do a Cpk.

Second, Yes, you can do a form of variance analysis for CpK, even as simple as plotting sequential CpK calculated values, and determining the variability of the CpK. And that could be used to calculate a confidence interval for the average value of the CpK. Keep in mind the standard deviation of an average is the individual's standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#7
In addition to the previous comments about sampling, I have some purely statistical advice. Remember that every time that you take a sample that there is some uncertainty in how well that statistic can estimate the true population parameter. We call these confidence intervals. In a sample where we desire the mean and standard deviation, both statistics will have confidence intervals.

Next, we want to determine a Cp/Cpk. In order to calculate either/both of these metrics, we need to use mean AND standard deviation, BOTH of which have confidence intervals around them. As a result, the Cp/Cpk metric will have even wider confidence intervals. While a sample size of 30-50 may provide reasonable confidence intervals around the mean, it does not for the Cp/Cpk metric. You need a sample size >= 100 before the confidence intervals around Cp/Cpk become reasonable. I have verified this using Monte Carlo simulation.
 

TWA - not the airline

Trusted Information Resource
#8
I am wondering if a customer who currently requires 100% inspection and does not seem to have specific requirements regarding how to prove process stability will have the expertise necessary to appreciate something like a confidence interval for a cpk.:notme:
 
Last edited:

Bill McNeese

Involved In Discussions
#10
Why does the customer require 100% inspection? Problems in the past? What Cpk value do they want from you? If you have year's worth of data, you should have an excellent view of what your process is doing over time - should include most of the potential sources of variation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M What is the proper way to document measurements Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
M Proper way to develop LCL when only given a lower spec limit Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
L How to write a proper defect description in a NCR Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
M Proper method to test flow of a regulator Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
M Proper terms for describing Hardness General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
M Proper ISO standard for Pressure Testing and Leak Rates Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
C Proper Thickness Gauge for Foam/Felt and Soft Materials General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
D Proper Tool to Measure Wall Thickness (ISO 3611 - Micrometers) Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
x-files Proper Document Control Requests Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
M Proper Gauging - GD&T - Attribute gage to check true positioning on the shop floor Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
S Proper Record/Document Manipulation Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
I Proper gauging of tight tolerance (reamed) holes General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
kedarg6500 Selection of proper modifying agent for Aluminium Silicon Alloy Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K Proper YTD PPM Supplier Calculation Six Sigma 3
S Proper FDA Classification for a DICOM Viewer 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 29
E Measuring Parts without Proper Tools - Measurement Device Resolution Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
J Proper Method of Measuring Hex Socket Heads Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
B Getting the proper information from the supplier - Returning Nonconforming Material Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
G What is the proper Thanks Giving turkey sampling size? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 9
B How to Determine the Proper Solder Class Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
S What is the proper flow to feedback the defective found during QA sampling check? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
M Proper Format for a Manufacturing Route Sheet Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
K Putting a regulated device on the market without the proper ISO Certs and CE Marking EU Medical Device Regulations 9
L Proper Personnel Ratio - Quality to Manufacturing Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M ISO14001 nonconformance - no proper treatment of wastewater prior to discharge ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
A What is the proper definition for Class 1 & 2 design changes AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
C Proper GD&T for spindle & housing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
A Proper term for 'Easy Identification'? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
M How to implement a proper Calibration System? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
F Is there a proper protocol to follow for Self Certification? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
B True Position without tertiary datum? Establishing a proper rotation Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 12
J Proper way to calibrate a check fixture General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
G Proper Poundage for Checking XX Tolerance Plain Plug Gages? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
G Labeling Responsibility - Manufacturer vs. Repacker? Proper Component Use ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
L Procedure for proper use and protection of Registration and Accreditation Marks Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
C What is the proper method for cleaning dial calipers? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
N Proper use of the Blueing process when inspecting the taper of bushings General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
J Proper use of gauge pins - Inspecting thru holes of plastic parts General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 19
I What is the proper date to use as effective date? Old 'procedures', New documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
D Rockwell vs. Vickers vs. Knoop - Does Thickness Determine the Proper Test? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M What is the proper way to use a GO NO/GO guage? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Preventive and Corrective Action Mapping - Proper Sequencing ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
T Registered or Certified - What is the proper terminology? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 17
John C. Abnet Must COPQ always be quantified as a monetary ($) amount? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S Gage R & R for large amount of inspections IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
J Studies conducted on the amount of autoclave sterilization of a PEEK implant Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
S How to make pack bolts and nuts kits with right amount Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 3
S Glove Protein Content in μg/dm2 to μg/g and Powder Amount mg/dm2 to mg/glove Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 4
M Using Minitab to Compute & Compare the Mean and Standard Deviation Amount Using Minitab Software 7

Similar threads

Top Bottom