millychantilly
Registered
Dear QA experts! Please tell me if I’m crazy in feeling shocked at how the QA department operates at my newish employer. I’d love the benefit of some insight from experienced professionals in pharma-adjacent fields: and suggestions you have.
After moving to a different job at a major pharma logistics player (can’t provide too many details), I’m struggling. As a Product Manager, I’ve always worked closely with QA. You’ve been terrific partners, who have brought not just regulatory and subject matter knowledge but also client-facing and execution skills. I’ve admired my former QA colleagues tremendously. And I was expecting more of the same.
But no. This QA team seems to be largely about administering SOPs that other people write and asking those same other people to review CAPAs. They have limited to no regulatory knowledge about pharma packaging, systems, or transport. They almost never interact with clients. They are not able to manage or deliver projects. They constantly say “we aren’t SMEs, we can’t do this.”
Some examples:
- My old QA teams would never have let me manage change notification since I’m a commercial person. This QA team has no product change management process in place, and don’t regard it as their jobs to track change or notify clients of major change. They weren’t aware this is a GxP obligation. No kidding. So I’ve now started to triage change and introduce an impact analysis and notification process. (This scares the heck out of me as I don’t think I know enough to do this.)
- When clients have regulatory questions about packaging, transport, etc. these get punted to me. QA have no idea, and there seems to be no concept of a regulatory function or education within the company. (Again, this terrifies me because who am I to answer these questions.)
- There is no understanding of GmP. I had to explain that certain kinds of tests had to be conducted at least in triplicate to be valid, and when they didn’t believe me, to prove this by showing the team documents from other supplier tests.
So - is this a logistics thing? Like, they’re just a totally different calibre compared with my previous colleagues? Or are Quality departments supposed to be like this and I’m the problem? This is not a small start-up by the way. It’s a business unit within an S&P 500 company.
Sorry about the rant. I would just love to hear what y’all think.
After moving to a different job at a major pharma logistics player (can’t provide too many details), I’m struggling. As a Product Manager, I’ve always worked closely with QA. You’ve been terrific partners, who have brought not just regulatory and subject matter knowledge but also client-facing and execution skills. I’ve admired my former QA colleagues tremendously. And I was expecting more of the same.
But no. This QA team seems to be largely about administering SOPs that other people write and asking those same other people to review CAPAs. They have limited to no regulatory knowledge about pharma packaging, systems, or transport. They almost never interact with clients. They are not able to manage or deliver projects. They constantly say “we aren’t SMEs, we can’t do this.”
Some examples:
- My old QA teams would never have let me manage change notification since I’m a commercial person. This QA team has no product change management process in place, and don’t regard it as their jobs to track change or notify clients of major change. They weren’t aware this is a GxP obligation. No kidding. So I’ve now started to triage change and introduce an impact analysis and notification process. (This scares the heck out of me as I don’t think I know enough to do this.)
- When clients have regulatory questions about packaging, transport, etc. these get punted to me. QA have no idea, and there seems to be no concept of a regulatory function or education within the company. (Again, this terrifies me because who am I to answer these questions.)
- There is no understanding of GmP. I had to explain that certain kinds of tests had to be conducted at least in triplicate to be valid, and when they didn’t believe me, to prove this by showing the team documents from other supplier tests.
So - is this a logistics thing? Like, they’re just a totally different calibre compared with my previous colleagues? Or are Quality departments supposed to be like this and I’m the problem? This is not a small start-up by the way. It’s a business unit within an S&P 500 company.
Sorry about the rant. I would just love to hear what y’all think.