Sweenman1957
Registered
Is the phrase "not used" acceptable in place of a clause?
Example :
2.2 Not used
Example :
2.2 Not used
If the alternative is to rewrite the document and invalidate references in other documents, “not in use” seems a reasonable way to remove something which is no longer valid. You’ll have old versions maintained of course if an auditor wanted to see what had been removed and explore why that was the case.Is the phrase "not used" acceptable in place of a clause?
Example :
2.2 Not used
Good day @Sweenman1957 ;Yes after and audit of QAP 10.1 several sub clauses were marked (2.1.1) "Removed" or (2.2.2) "Not Used".
Can these terms be left or does the entire QAP need to be rewritten and renumbered?
What @Big Jim said.Good day @Sweenman1957 ;
Still unclear of your references...
* What does "QAP" stand for ?
* Are you referencing ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.1 - Improvement (General) ?
* You are placing "removed" (2.1.1) and "Not Used" (2.2.2) in quotes as if you are pulling these terms from a document or standard. Where are you
pulling these terms (and referenced numbers...e.g. "2.1.1") from ?
Thanks in advance for helping us help you.