QMS / QSR - Reference to Framework - Templates - Procedures for Medical Devices

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#1
QMS :- quality management system
QSR :- quality system regulations.

Is there an equivalent reference or document to provide outline various QMS / QSR processed involved for compliance to 21 CFR part 820 or ISO 13485. for medical device!!!

WHO has published such a useful repository for drug product.
http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/production/en/

http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/QualityAssurancePharmVol2.pdf

http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/64465/1/WHO_VSQ_97.01.pdf

etc .,
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#2
wonder if 'restricting' or controlling the templates-formats really have any meaning!

it is proved time&again that real value IS IN spirit+extent of implementation of QMS.:cool:
i.e., having SOP alone just does not yield the expected and required benefit.
viz., we might include the 5-why tools; or fish-bone diagram as formats in the SOPs, but real benefit will only be yielded WHEN&ONCE they are applied to fullest extent!


This perception is backed by examples of FDA 483s and warning letters to some of the established 'companies' in the market. ( infact, i am unable to say it as leaders ,
* as standards are not uniform......and
* they are quite a spectrum of requirements/practices for any given procedure!!! ( noted an simple 5d format vs detailed 3-stage handling of incident procedures across organizations! )
* atleast there is little consensus on QMS requirements .., apart from the ISPE, PDA like organizations which focus on highly specific topics;
vs
though this comment/observation is from outside, compare above ispe/pda initiatives to the standards of qualifications procedures followed by automotive industry from supplier qualification, MSA published by industry consortiums!)
* let alone the interpretation and implementation of standards by the regulatory agencies! ( barring the recent effort to share the audit observations, and joint audits being performed across agencies)

in one line,
what do we really gain by making the sops-templates-formats available in general ( atleast generic ones!_
or
is there a place-group which really makes the qms templates-formats available for free access!!!:notme::confused:

Anyways, on note of forward looking.... its time to embrace a representation similar to that of SEI-CMM ...
this is nicely demonstrated in the SEI-CMM levels of software development!!!... which is in itself definition of process
Level 1 – Initial: Company has no standard process for software development. Nor does it have a project-tracking system that enables developers to predict costs or finish dates with any accuracy.
Level 2 – Managed: Company has installed basic software management processes and controls. But there is no consistency or coordination among different groups.
Level 3 – Defined: Company has pulled together a standard set of processes and controls for the entire organization so that developers can move between projects more easily and customers can begin to get consistency from different groups.
Level 4 – Quantitatively Managed: In addition to implementing standard processes, company has installed systems to measure the quality of those processes across all projects.
Level 5 – Optimizing: Company has accomplished all of the above and can now begin to see patterns in performance over time, so it can tweak its processes in order to improve productivity and reduce defects in software development across the entire organization.
 
Last edited:

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#3
Re: wonder if 'restricting' or controlling the templates-formats really have any mean

Problem 1 is the goal posts tend to change over the years.

Problem 2 is that technology and software is changing so fast that once (for example in CMMI) a company is at level 5 it finds its self back at level 2.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#4
I'm not sure what you exactly expect with the second post (but I don't know of any group creating and making available medical devices QMS templates), but here are some food for thought:

- Templates are only as good as the person using them. If you know what you are doing, a template can help you begin something not from scratch. If you do not know what you are doing, no template will help you.

- I always use "templates" (in fact, the last iteration of a template from my last client) in a client to show the idea of something, but in the end his/her document is always so different from the "template" that calling it a template is a misnomer :p (but I know how to use all of them so it's no problem for me guiding the client in creating the correct document for his/her use).

- in the case of QMS templates, most templates that I see are not "procedure templates", but a mix of very different stuff. A procedure is "a specified way to carry out an activity or a process", meaning, they should be simply the set-by step of an activity for example (with related stuff required for the performance of the activity). Most templates I see are a mix of a procedure with a specification (detailing requirements), but are a bad specification, because they define the requirements of the standard and not the requirements of the related activity. This makes no sense at all. So in fact, in my opinion, most are simply bad templates. No wonder people have no idea how to use them :p
 
Last edited:

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#5
but here are some food for thought:

- Templates are only as good as the person using them. If you know what you are doing, a template can help you begin something not from scratch. If you do not know what you are doing, no template will help you.

- I always use "templates" (in fact, the last iteration of a template from my last client) in a client to show the idea of something, but in the end his/her document is always so different from the "template" that calling it a template is a misnomer :p (but I know how to use all of them so it's no problem for me guiding the client in creating the correct document for his/her use).

- in the case of QMS templates, most templates that I see are not "procedure templates", but a mix of very different stuff. A procedure is "a specified way to carry out an activity or a process", meaning, they should be simply the set-by step of an activity for example (with related stuff required for the performance of the activity). Most templates I see are a mix of a procedure with a specification (detailing requirements), but are a bad specification, because they define the requirements of the standard and not the requirements of the related activity. This makes no sense at all. So in fact, in my opinion, most are simply bad templates. No wonder people have no idea how to use them :-
P
:applause::agree:

I'm not sure what you exactly expect with the second post (but I don't know of any group creating and making available medical devices QMS templates),
why are standards (requirements-expectations) soooo much cryptic? what stops them from being atleast to have appendix/annexures which are indicative of what they could look like. (viz., even you mentioned each implementation would lead to highly specific/customized form for each template, and each iteraction evolves it in some ways... )

in one line,
1) like WHO has come up with certain form/templates for cGMPs , is there equivalent such forms/templates for Devices
2) since anyways its going to be evolved and customized to specific needs, what is stopping from these forms being available (in one form or another)!:frust:
 
Last edited:

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#6
why are standards (requirements-expectations) soooo much cryptic?
In my opinion they aren't.

Further, what do you think 90% of the enterprises would have done if ISO, for instance, released a standard template?... Exactly - they would have adopted it as-is, investing as little as possible thought and resources in actually adjusting them so that the goals of having a QMS could be effectively met. There are privately-created templates circulating in the market, and too many times I've seen systems which are thoughtless duplicates of such templates, sitting there gathering dust and adding near zero value.

(Please forgive my cynicism)
 

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#7
In my opinion they aren't.

...
(Please forgive my cynicism)
And in fact, I share your cynicism, (if not more :frust::frust::bonk::bonk:)

BUT, not withstanding what most of them are doing;....
I really think what WHO did is really commendable.,!!! and it puts most common options in place and a very good starting point. (as opined by Marcelo Atunes )

on other hand, it might also be putting off same guys... as they are interpreted every time in different ways by different persons (even auditors! ....between agencies/authorities!!!)

we have got people who can deal with certain complex technologies and processes; but when it comes to quality/compliance processes, they treat it as if its alien thing!!! ( personnel include at different levels and across functions!!!)

for personnel who might be on border/interested....not having templates is putting them off.... { what they say is that, it took hundreds of year to bring wheels under for travelling baggage!!! ...u see what i am saying.... templates are there...few evolved., some times i wonder, how long it took our existing templates to be here; and i surely see that they require to evolve to address not just future requirements but to support organizational maturity in implementing/adopting/executing those processes!!!)

and the point is...while each constituent require certain different aspects to overcome....the above context is to find a solution at the genesis. i.e., definition level of requirements-framework etc., (extend/better the guidance same )
 
Last edited:

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#8
I don't know the WHO templates but since drugs and medical devices are not that far apart, they can be used as an origin template for a medical devices QMS.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#10
AGREE..., and i am looking for specifically the templates for (i acknowledge the same during earlier one of the discussion)

  • [*]820.20 Management Responsibility
    [*]820.30 Design Controls
    [*]820.100 Corrective and Preventive Action
Don't the WHO QMS templates address management responsibility, design controls (ie how to develop products etc.) and CAPA? Not at all? :mg:

Either way, in the thread you linked to you already received plenty of guidance and resources to support developing compliant systems in the above fields - with or without templates.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Definition Q - Definitions of all the Q's - QM, QMS, QP, QSR, etc. Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 18
S Disparity between Job Descriptions in QMS & Contract ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
qualprod Minimize tomention other positions to ease the QMS management ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
S QMS certificate and Samlping EU Medical Device Regulations 0
H Mapping QMS+business processes in a medical device with class I and IIa+b Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 3
Y Must Initial importers have any QMS? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
qualprod QMS global effectiveness? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Q 13485 QMS turnkey ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
K New to Medical Device QMS and would like advice ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
N QMS standard for a research based Organisation Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
Moncia Integrated QMS and audit Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
J New QMS Auditor - seeking opportunities to gain audit experience Career and Occupation Discussions 3
Sam Lazzara Record signature requirements in proposed FDA 21 CFR 820 QMS Regulation 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
qualprod External consultant into a QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
S Changing PCB Assembler and impact on QMS and MDD CE Certificate EU Medical Device Regulations 2
ChrisM Class 1 non-sterile device, need certified QMS or not? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
A CDRH Learn and DICE for Building a QMS 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
A QMS inside a Non medical device firm ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S HELP in setting-up QMS Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 4
S How long the QMS must be maintained after device EOL? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Processes interaction of QMS Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 4
P Can I exempt products/services from my AS9100 QMS? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
J0anne QMS Implementation Iran ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
adir88 Substantial Change to QMS (Annex IX, Chapter I) EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Watchcat When to begin putting together postmarket production QMS for a mobile app? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 13
B QMS Functional Safety Checklist ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 0
D Proof QMS compliance for class I ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A Need career advice on QMS & HSE (No hands on experience) Career and Occupation Discussions 6
M Sharing QMS Documents with Customers Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
M Options when MSA acc. to VDA 5 is NOK (Qms > 30%) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
D QMS Realignment after business splits into 2 different companies AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
G One-person QMS - possible? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
A SaaS SaMD - Impact QMS ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S ISO9001 QMS: Quality Manual Examples & Templates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
K Is implementing Electronic Signatures a Significant Change to the QMS? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
qualprod Can a consultant be audited instead of QMS responsible? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S Do you follow your QMS for non-device software features? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
Ed Panek How to address a QMS Entry Error ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
D Digital Healthcare - QMS requirements Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
BeaBea QMS/ Training Management Software Service Industry Specific Topics 4
R QMS for Medical products & Pharmaceutical Drugs in one facility Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
C First Round of QMS Internal Audits - Ethical Dilemma Internal Auditing 10
N Handling B-Grade Products within the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
M Supplied Goods out of QMS / DtS? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Can outsourced processes be excluded from QMS scope? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
H QMS ISO 13485:2016 - ISO14971 IEC60304 etc ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Implementation of QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
M Correcting Electronic QMS Records AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
M Are We Ready for a QMS? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 8
I QMS monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation requirement - Template ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom