QS Sanctioned Intrepretations of May 29, 2001

J

Jaycee

#1
Hello Folks,

Are you aware that there is a new QS sanctioned interpretation - released on 29th May 2001! You can download it from www.qs-9000.org.

And everybody says that QS is dead!!!!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
S

Spaceman Spiff

#2
Jaycee, living in central Florida, even the old junkers in someone's front yard gets washed once in a while.
 
L

Laura M

#3
Thanks!

Ya know - I just checked earlier last week, so I wasn't likely to find this out for a while. Score another one for "the cove."
 
S
#4
Now that we have had a chance to read the change, it will be interesting to hear the input.

Does this mean that every Mfg in the country that supplies to the automotive industry must become ISO certified within the next 18 months? Or am I over reacting?

" “Goal of subcontractor compliance” requires subcontractors to achieve compliance within a defined period of time not to exceed 18 months from the effective date of this sanctioned interpretation. Minimum subcontractor compliance shall be certification by an accredited certification body to a current version of the ISO 9000 Quality Management Series of Standards, excluding ISO 9003; plus any requirements specified by the customer.

Note: The second note under 4.6.2.1 referencing “prioritization” does not negate this requirement."
 
R

Roger Eastin

#6
I read the sanctioned interpretations and it sure looks like the B3 are asking for 3rd party certification to ISO9001 for subcontractors. I suppose "certification by an accredited certification body" = 3rd party registration? If this is so, then 18 months is not much time!! This sounds like the same sort of requirement as labs being accredited to Guide 25! Look how the B3 had to back-track on that one!
 
B

BigEasy Chemist

#7
Anyone want to venture a guess as to how many tiers down this 'should' (in the eyes of a registrar) go?
 
B
#8
I wonder what a company will do if their "customer approved" subcontractor says no. On one hand, they must use that subcontractor, on the other their subcontractor won't participate!
 
A

Al Dyer

#9
Originally posted by Brad:
I wonder what a company will do if their "customer approved" subcontractor says no. On one hand, they must use that subcontractor, on the other their subcontractor won't participate!
Brad:

Would not a "customer approved" supplier already be registered?

Communication and Documention of the situation.

ASD...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A IATF Sanctioned Interpretation No. 7 - Type and Extent of Control (supplemental) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
L IATF 16949 Contingency plan requirements / Sanctioned Interpretations? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 33
P Sanctioned Interpretations - IATF 16949 Cl. 8.3.3.3 Special characteristics IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Marc AS/EN/JISQ 9100:2016 IAQG Sanctioned Aerospace Auditor Training Available (Nov 2016) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
T TS 16949 Clause 7.4.1.2 and Sanctioned Interpretation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
J Rules 3rd Edition Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) Posted 07/16/2010 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
D IAQG Sanctioned Aerospace Auditor Transition Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
Sidney Vianna IAQG Sanctioned Resolutions for the Aerospace QMS Certification Scheme AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
S Automotive Process Approach Auditing sanctioned interpretations S1 04 04 General Auditing Discussions 1
Sidney Vianna ISO 14001 Interpretations - sanctioned in the USA ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
howste New IATF Sanctioned Interpretation: Automotive Process Approach Auditing ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 14
S November 2003 QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations - The Use of OEMs for Calibration QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
Q IASG Sanctioned Interpretations for QS 9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
S IAOB Sanctioned Interpretations - Duplications/contradictions - TS update/interps? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
J TS 16949 Sanctioned Interpretations yet? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
C Sanctioned Interpretation - Merger / Joint Venture Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 19
A Distributors - QS-9000 3rd edition and sanctioned interpretation C-9 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
S ISO TS 16949:2002 - Sanctioned interpretations on the new requirements yet? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
Q Previous Sanctioned Interpretations QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
L Sanctioned Interpretations - GM Definition for 'Level II Controlled Shipping' QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
G Interpreting the Sanctioned Interpretations General Auditing Discussions 1
L Sanctioned format for the Chrysler 7 Step Corrective Action Process Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
K New QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations - 1 July 2001 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 139
V IASG sanctioned interpretations QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
G QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
D AIAG approved for sanctioned training delivery QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
D Does Manufacture can submit CE mark application under MDD with NB for his New product after May 2020? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
dgrainger Informational UK guidance on FSNs - May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
dgrainger Informational UK guidance on FSNs - Published 20 May 2020 UK Medical Device Regulations 1
GStough WCQI Virtual Conference May 6, 2020 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
C Critical Suppliers for EU medical device approvals May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Z Role of economic operators (EO) post the EU MDR Date of application in May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational US FDA – URGENT/11 Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in a Widely-Used Third-Party Software Component May Introduce Risks During Use of Certain Medical Dev Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
D MDD Certification Validity after May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 12
M Informational Some things the EU MDR 2017/745 does not tell you, but you may need to know to comply with it effectively – Part 1 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
K EU MDD Class I Device market access / certification after 26th May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 9
M Informational BSI – ISO 13485 and products with May 2020 deadline for MDR certification Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
L Dying a slow SCOPE death - NEW ISO APG Paper on Scope and Applicability May 2020. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
Marc FDA safety scandal: 50K hidden reports of heart device malfunctioning - May 2019 Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
Marc Problem with 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) sub-forum link - 2 May 2019 Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
Marc The 500th Anniversary of Leonardo da Vinci who died in May 1519 World News 1
Jane's You may or may not have the same person managing Operations and QA ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
E Risk Analysis - Events which may cause to Data Loss ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 12
Marc Some Questions an Auditor may Ask General Auditing Discussions 0
M Free Risk Management Webinar - Design for Quality - May 2017 Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 1
M MDR and IVDR to be published May 5th 2017 EU Medical Device Regulations 14
SteveK MDR & IVDR Introduction in late May 2017 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Jen Kirley It's good to be back! May 2016 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 188
I ISO 26262 standard may apply to automotive IC suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R CFDA submission fees as of May 2015 China Medical Device Regulations 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom