QS9000 Management Review - Review every section and sub-section of the manual?

J

James Guerin

#1
:frust:
I am looking for some opinions on QS9000 Management Review. I have been with my current company 3 months. I was hired as the Quality Manager / Management Rep. I am preparing for our annual management review and am experiencing some frustration with the previous Quality Manager (who is also the Operations Manager). The viewpoint taken by the old regime is that the only good way to satisfy management review according to QS is to review every section and sub-section of the manual and comment on its suitability and effectiveness. I believe this is a waste of time. I do not see how performing this task accomplishes the bigger picture - Is the overall system effective at: compliance to the standard, compliance to our customer expectations and compliance to our company's business plan.

I have spent a couple of months reviewing our company's manual and tracing the document structure / compliance. I have prepared an assessment of each element for review by the management team. My intentions are to have certain managers responsible for specific elements. These would be individuals intimate with the processes described by the element. Over time these people would report on the status of the elements. In addition, reviews would include discussion of internal and external business metrics, QS internal and external audits, corrective and preventive actions and human resource and facilities management. The discussion surrounding these would be used to determine S and E of the Quality Management System.

I plan on holding my ground on my approach, but the old regime has a reputation for getting their way.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Kevin Mader

One of THE Original Covers!
Staff member
Admin
#2
James,

Your plan is a good one, but I'm afraid that there is some validity in the comment from your Operations Manager. Sad, but true.

I had a very similar approach (to yours) as to what a Management Review meeting needed to make it useful. In a review of two separate auditors whom also did QS9000 audit, they were uncomfortable with the format and both made clear statements to the effect that the QS9000 requirements are specific in that they require a point-by-point addressment during Management Review. Both referred me to the requirements and the interpretations. To a large degree, I still don't agree with them, but perhaps not to the extent of risking a pulled registration.

This, I think, speaks volumes to a point made here by Systems Thinker who asserted that the problem with ISO9000 is that it is not a holistic plan. He is absolutely right in my opinion to make this assertion. QS9000 is no better to this regard. Perhaps this is why everything appears so segmented that the only way to truly prove that you addressed all aspects is by addressing each and every point. It is a load of rubbish to assume that by addressing the pieces you address the whole. I think that here in lies the rub you feel, as do many of us. Intuitively, we want to assess the whole, but can't.

Hopefully others here can lend insight to ways around treating the point-by-point approach through their success with various registrars (mine was TUV). Otherwise, you might have to do what you'd least like to.

Regards,

Kevin
 
R

Randy Stewart

#3
I agree with you, the review of a useless manual just adds more uselessness to the whole thing.
We reviewed the Internal Audits which were element based. This ensured we hit all the elements, even if it was no compliance issues noted. I would also take an element and break it down, very similar to what you are suggesting, to explain applicability, meaning and compliance.

Now how to sell it? I guess my first approach would be to look at the amount of changes (to the manual) that came about due to the reviews. If the reviews didn't result in changes then they didn't provide much "value addedness" to your system. Save time, save money.
 
J

James Guerin

#4
:frust:
Kevin:

Thanks for your input. From your comment:

Your plan is a good one, but I'm afraid that there is
some validity in the comment from your Operations Manager. Sad,
but true.


do you think there is room for compromise. The previous annual review was done in the following manner. The Ops manager prepared his own version of a spreadsheet with all elements numbered (including sub-paragraphs). He then gave each and every indentation an S or E and stated that this was from a crossfunctional review.

My goal is to deliver a breakdown by section for managers to review prior to the meeting. This, in conjunction with other agenda items will be discussed and at the end of the meeting a blanket statement regarding S and E will be made and recorded in the minutes.

My original concern related to ranking each and every sub-section with an S and E. I do believe that to satisfy the intent of the standard, each QS element needs to be reviewed. My belief is that this review along with a review of additional system inputs (business plan metrics, audits, customer feedback etc...) can be used to determine S and E.

Also, in another reply from Stew, it was mentioned that using audit results from internal and surveillance should help satisfy review of all Quality System Elements. I have dealt with auditors that will not accept this method.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P QS9000 or TR 16949? Which should we register to? Management wants one or the other QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
R Human resource Management - QS9000 or ISO9000 have not addressed QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3
S Was QS9000 replaced by ISO/TS 16949 since December 2006? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
M Where can I buy a copy of the QS9000 standard? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 16
P ISO/TS16949 Lead Auditor requirements - Transitioning from QS9000 to ISO/TS16949 General Auditing Discussions 6
Q QS9000 Tier 2 for 12 Years - Transitioning to ISO9001 - Where do I start? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
I AS9100 vs. QS9000 vs. ISO-TS16949 - Similarities and Differences AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
L 7.3 excluded from Scope in QS9000, back in TS16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
B Converting from QS9000 to TS 16949 ... HOW? WHO? HOW MUCH? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S TS16949 - QS9000 Gap Analysis and comparison matrix IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
Q Promoted to "Maintenance Manager - What should I expect in an ISO / QS9000 audit? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 6
B Does anyone have a good cross reference from QS9000 to TS16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Z ISO / TS16949 Quality Manual needed - Changing from QS9000 to ISO / TS16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
S SOP Numbering - About to change over from QS9000 to ISO 9001 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
J Getting Rid of QS9000 Procedures that are no longer necessary with TS 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
C QS9000 TE vs. TS16949 - Registration Applicability and Requirements Conflicts IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Manix Template of Supplement K from the QS9000 APQP manual APQP and PPAP 11
T qs9000 standard QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
B TS 16949 Implementation - Upgrade from QS9000 - What are the Steps? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M Advertising - Trucks with ISO9002, TS16949, ISO14001, & QS9000 written on them IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M ISO 9001 vs. QS9000 vs. ISO 14001 - Job interview tomorrow night for a QM position Career and Occupation Discussions 4
K The "Shalls" of QS9000 T&E Supplement QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
J Powerway Software - We are moving from QS9000 to TS 16949 Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
S QS9000 to TS16949 Transition - How difficult was it, REALLY?? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
Raffy ISO9001:2000 Transition from QS9000 - Or Both? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Raffy Training to QS9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
S TS16949 Prerequisite - An organization must already be QS9000 certified? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 19
Y QS9000 officially obsolete and replace by TS 16949? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3
J Big 3 can hold your QS9000 registration hostage! QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 22
R QS9000 Software - Has anyone heard about QSP a UK Package QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 0
A ISO 9001:2000 Vs QS9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 0
M Six Sigma - Las similitudes entre six sigma y qs9000 Six Sigma 2
R Writing QM for QS9000 & ISO9K2K QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
P QS9000 manuals revision outdated QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 7
H FMEA Comparison QS9000 and VDA 4.2 FMEA and Control Plans 2
R Ford, QOS and QS9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3
S iso 9001/qs9000/iso14001 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
C QS9000:1998 TO ISO 9001:2000 + ISO-TS 16949:2002 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
J QS9000 supplier reqts Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
B Product ID, Inspection and Test Status, - QS9000 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
M QS9000 to TS16949 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 11
J Calibration lab reqts for QS9000 (TS also?) QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
D QS9000 "compliant" QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
W SPC all the time? Does QS9000 require statistical control on all processes? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3
D Red, Yellow, and Green and QS9000 Suppliers - Visual evaluation of the status QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
M Sample Business Plans meeting QS9000 Requirements QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
R Simplest way to make transition Iso 9001 ->QS9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
Kevin Mader QS9000 Video QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
D QS9000 - Changes in personel requirements to match the job description QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
Casana QS9000 vs. TL9000 - What are the differences? TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom