D
Don8560
First let me introduce myself. I was a QA Manager for 17 years and was the MR for a QS-9000 certified company. I took a little sabbatical from the quality field over the last two years, now I'm back.
The company I'm working for has seven employees and the owner wants to pursue ISO 9K2K. I've been here about 2 months and the company has been in business for 1 year. We are in the qualification stage of our product and no customer has asked us to pursue certification. I give the owner credit in being proactive in this venture.
Now to my question, I purchased a canned ISO 9K2K manual, procedures and forms that was not very expensive. It was well written and covered the standard, although we are making many modifications. The canned package had the procedures implemented into the Manual.
I see this as being a document control issue since every time a procedure is updated, we will have to revise the level 1 document. In the past one of the first questions my registrar asked during a surveillance audit, was what rev. level the Quality Manual was at. Has anyone here combined the two or do you think I should separate the procedures from the manual.
I've been lurking in this site for about a week and really enjoy the insight of other Quality Professionals.
The company I'm working for has seven employees and the owner wants to pursue ISO 9K2K. I've been here about 2 months and the company has been in business for 1 year. We are in the qualification stage of our product and no customer has asked us to pursue certification. I give the owner credit in being proactive in this venture.
Now to my question, I purchased a canned ISO 9K2K manual, procedures and forms that was not very expensive. It was well written and covered the standard, although we are making many modifications. The canned package had the procedures implemented into the Manual.
I see this as being a document control issue since every time a procedure is updated, we will have to revise the level 1 document. In the past one of the first questions my registrar asked during a surveillance audit, was what rev. level the Quality Manual was at. Has anyone here combined the two or do you think I should separate the procedures from the manual.
I've been lurking in this site for about a week and really enjoy the insight of other Quality Professionals.