R
rmf
Goodday,
This is my understanding on how Quality registrations are to be made:
In order to achieve continual improvement an organization should document & analyze non conformities and then make sure they get solved. In my company when detecting a NC an NCRF(non-conformity registration form) is filled out and sent to the department where the NC occured. These forms are only used when more serious NC's are detected.
With minor NC's we want to use so called 'scorelists'. Each department has their own list with several items on it like communication with customers or internal computer network. Each time a small NC occurs a score is added to the relevant item.
The scorelists will be analyzed on bimonthly basis by the quality manager.
Is this a efficient and effective way to keep Quality registrations or are we doing something wrong?
Is it better to use logbooks on every department in stead of scorelists?
does anyone have suggestions on how we could improve this?
thanks in advance!
R
This is my understanding on how Quality registrations are to be made:
In order to achieve continual improvement an organization should document & analyze non conformities and then make sure they get solved. In my company when detecting a NC an NCRF(non-conformity registration form) is filled out and sent to the department where the NC occured. These forms are only used when more serious NC's are detected.
With minor NC's we want to use so called 'scorelists'. Each department has their own list with several items on it like communication with customers or internal computer network. Each time a small NC occurs a score is added to the relevant item.
The scorelists will be analyzed on bimonthly basis by the quality manager.
Is this a efficient and effective way to keep Quality registrations or are we doing something wrong?
Is it better to use logbooks on every department in stead of scorelists?
does anyone have suggestions on how we could improve this?
thanks in advance!
R