Hello,
This is my first post so I hope this isn't breaking any rules. I did search for this to see if it was already posted and couldn't find it.
I am seeking advice on how to interpret the risk in determining the number of parts, operators and replicates in a GR&R.
For example, how can I communicate the risk in running different variations in the number of parts, operators and replicates. I'm used to running 10 part, 3 operators 3 times and am being asked why we can't reduce that because "it will take too long".
Is there some way to put it in terms of how confident we can be if we measure capability and how that is impacted by changing the number of parts, operators or replicates?
Thank you!
This is my first post so I hope this isn't breaking any rules. I did search for this to see if it was already posted and couldn't find it.
I am seeking advice on how to interpret the risk in determining the number of parts, operators and replicates in a GR&R.
For example, how can I communicate the risk in running different variations in the number of parts, operators and replicates. I'm used to running 10 part, 3 operators 3 times and am being asked why we can't reduce that because "it will take too long".
Is there some way to put it in terms of how confident we can be if we measure capability and how that is impacted by changing the number of parts, operators or replicates?
Thank you!