Question on wording in DOD RFQ regarding ISO 9000

apestate

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
Hello all..

Quick question about this RFQ from Defense Logistics Agency.

The product we're quoting is a mechanical engine stand and would be made according to some old blueprints. We're not the design authority.

In the RFQ they have this wording, and I would like to learn precisely what it means:

"The contractor shall comply with the tailored ISO 9000 higher-level quality standard (FAR 52.246-11 Higher-level contract quality requirement)."

Does this mean we have to be registered to ISO 9000 by a third party?

What do they mean by "the tailored ISO 9000 higher-level quality standard" ?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#2
It sounds like it was written by someone who didn't completely understand the FARs and ISO 9001.

FAR 52.246-11 requires the Contracting Officer to "insert the title, number, date, and tailoring (if any) of the higher-level quality standards." If they didn't state what the tailoring is, stating "tailored ISO 9000" doesn't make sense. Also, ISO 9000 is a "fundamentals and vocabulary" document not a requirements standard. I'm sure they mean ISO 9001 instead.

FAR 52.246-11 requires compliance with, but not certification to the referenced standard.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#3
Some flunky GS7 or WG5 or whatever probably learned some buzz words and the CO or a COR approved the language because it sounded and looked pretty official. I speak a bit from the experience of working in governemnt contracting about 18 years.
 
#4
Some flunky GS7 or WG5 or whatever probably learned some buzz words and the CO or a COR approved the language because it sounded and looked pretty official. I speak a bit from the experience of working in governemnt contracting about 18 years.
:topic:Was that as a GS7 or WG5? Or were you the officer that signed off?:lmao:
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#5
:topic:Was that as a GS7 or WG5? Or were you the officer that signed off?:lmao:
Pay categories in the civil service system which would be pretty common levels for intitial prep of stuff like this that would later be passed on to higher level folks to finalize.

And Andy, I wasn't an officer, they found out that mom and dad were married at least 1 year prior to my birth so I was stuck in the non-commissioned officer ranks:lmao:
 

apestate

Quite Involved in Discussions
#7
OK

I've been reading some Navy purchasing contracts.

:truce:

Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement seems to be showing up in NAVICP procurement contracts only. Some of the NAVICP contracts state a SHALL and MIL-I-45208. Some state that we can pick between MIL-I-45208, MIL-Q-9858, ISO 9000, AS9100.

Some of the contracts are from DLA procurement, and they don't have any Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement or anything stating QMS or inspection standards at all, besides first-article and production lot testing with a sample size of 2.

Our DCMA QAR has been clobbering us with corrective actions that we really earned, not by workmanship, but by deviating from print for manufacturability. The last time, he gigged us on our quality system, stating that the contracts all have MIL-I-45208 and that's what he wants to see being done.

Well, I have a big problem with that. Acceptance sampling, small lots. If we're required to do acceptance sampling for any reason at all, we're basically doing 100% inspection, 100% total layout of every feature, at every stage of manufacturing. Absurd and impossible.

After scrutinizing every contract, I see MIL-I-45208 required on only a few, with others allowing optional standards, and others with no requirement at all.

What should these contracts really require us to do with regard to quality management and with regard to inspection?

They should all be the same, right?
 
M

MRFMACHINE

#8
I have been going thru this on a couple of contracts, the solicitation state ISO 9001:2008 tailored listing the sections they want you to be compliant with. When I get to the section that asks about our Quality Level I picked other and typed in MIL-I-45208 because our manual was based of of that standard. When we were awarded the contract is has the ISO requirements in the front and under Section E it lists the MIL-I-45208. Long story short version is DCMA removed the ISO clause and told me that my MIL-I-45208 was the minimum level that would be acceptable. They also informed me that if I bid on any other -11 higher level quality solicitations and receive contracts that I will be bound by the ISO 9001:2008 tailored requirements. They also told me that what ever is called out in the contract for a quality level you must have a system in place to that level or higher before any parts are manufactured for that contract. Hope this helps if you need more info email me direct. Thanks Mike
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S FDA 510(K) submission question US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
Ron Rompen Question regarding CMM probe damage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
T FDA UDI Question - Class II Medical Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
C Complaint Return Sample Size Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
8 Drawing Feature Question Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
D Question: How to analyze numerical and attribute data Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 11
D Question on electronic signatures and initials on batch records ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A Special Characteristic question from Automotive CSR Customer and Company Specific Requirements 9
Ron Rompen GDT Question - is this even correct? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A PPAP question for audit APQP and PPAP 16
C ISO Question - Do you say "I-S-O" or "I-Soh"? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 14
D Question regarding where "validations" fit according to ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Question on Supplier Quality (SCAR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
A +0/-.001 Tolerance question - Feature size is 1.249 +0/-.001 - Actually measures 1.2493 (.0003 OHL Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 12
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
D Question on Documented Calibration versus ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A Design Change/ECO Related Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
S Configuration Item definition question AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
C Quality Management System Question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 32
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Calibration/Verification records question ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 6
I IMDS Error Message Question RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1
lanley liao Question regarding the calibration of monitoring and measure equipment. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
C Gauge R&R Question Using Minitab Software 1
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
K Question on MDR classification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
D Question on equipment - when to use reference only or research only stickers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D Work Instruction Question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Clinical Decision Support Software Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
John C. Abnet VDA 6.3 - Question 7.3 - "blocking of parts" VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 6
D Approved supplier list - Distributors question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Equipment Register and PM question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Question regarding "storage and distribution" ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
D Question regarding customer feedback process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Equipment Register related question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Study sign off question / responsibilities ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Qualification question - ISO 13485 - Setting up a small lab Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
M Question for Auditors - "Off the Record" Conversation? General Auditing Discussions 14
D Question regarding ECO process, specifically for Life Science products and defining form fit and function ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
R Accelerated Aging - Creating test samples - Implantable medical device Question Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
A Question on Authorized Representative in Malaysia Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
D Limited Scope for second site Question? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
I ISO 2233:2000 Question - Medical Device Shipping/Transportation Validation Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
Anonymous16-2 Labeling Question (Dietary Supplements/Food) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
T Question for: Cg & Cgk calculation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
N ASL Question for GitHub ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
hogheavenfarm GDT Flatness measurement question Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
A Question on ISO 14001:2015 - Are annual audits required? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 11

Similar threads

Top Bottom