Question regarding supplier approvals

J

Jim-S

#1
I work for a pharmaceutical company that is new to devices & ISO. All of our procedures were designed to comply with 21 CFR 211. – I recently initiated some requests to begin evaluating the suppliers for our new medical device product. We have an existing procedure for approving suppliers which begins with sending the suppliers a 13 page “supplier quality system questionnaire”. I looked at the regulations and it seems to me that both ISO and 820 only require that you establish a procedure evaluating and approving suppliers. They don’t require a particular format or any specific questions, so the current questionnaire seems sufficient to me. - However, our internal auditor objected to our use of the existing questionnaire because hasn’t been tailored to medical devices. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Do I need a device specific questionnaire?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Coury Ferguson

Moderator here to help
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
I work for a pharmaceutical company that is new to devices & ISO. All of our procedures were designed to comply with 21 CFR 211. – I recently initiated some requests to begin evaluating the suppliers for our new medical device product. We have an existing procedure for approving suppliers which begins with sending the suppliers a 13 page “supplier quality system questionnaire”. I looked at the regulations and it seems to me that both ISO and 820 only require that you establish a procedure evaluating and approving suppliers. They don’t require a particular format or any specific questions, so the current questionnaire seems sufficient to me. - However, our internal auditor objected to our use of the existing questionnaire because hasn’t been tailored to medical devices. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Do I need a device specific questionnaire?
In my opinion, definitely No. The IA is incorrect in their assessment. Now I am answering this based upon my knowledge of ISO9001:200x and AS9100x and not an expert in ISO13485, which may require something else.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
I work for a pharmaceutical company that is new to devices & ISO. All of our procedures were designed to comply with 21 CFR 211. – I recently initiated some requests to begin evaluating the suppliers for our new medical device product. We have an existing procedure for approving suppliers which begins with sending the suppliers a 13 page “supplier quality system questionnaire”. I looked at the regulations and it seems to me that both ISO and 820 only require that you establish a procedure evaluating and approving suppliers. They don’t require a particular format or any specific questions, so the current questionnaire seems sufficient to me. - However, our internal auditor objected to our use of the existing questionnaire because hasn’t been tailored to medical devices. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Do I need a device specific questionnaire?
We have a need to go to a supplier because we cannot or do not want to do that process ourself. Hence your approval of the supplier has to be centered towards what part or process you outsourse from the supplier. What you may assess of that supplier perhaps is how he can meet and supply you what you desire to the required quality and quanity and timely delivery. How he can sustain and continually improve and be able to grow with your future demand plans. His ability to give engineering solutions and be able to handle complaints and corrective actions systamatically....
So what “supplier quality system questionnaire” you mention, does it address all these ? I am sure it cannot be same start to end for all suppliers. Think of it. Your internal auditor seems to be asking you these or similar questions >>>>>>> Is he correct ???
Good luck Jim.
Somashekar
INDIA
 

Big Jim

Super Moderator
#4
I'm not very familiar with the medical devices standard so there may be something unique there that I don't know about.

Generally speaking, whatever questionnair you use, it should be tailored to your use. Are there any questions that are not on the current one that you would like to see asked? You can pass the current one around the purchasing and engineering staff and ask them to red line it with suggestions. Does the current one have questions that you don't need? Then tailor it yourself.

Don't forget that you need to evaluate your suppliers. Filling out a survey is not an evaluation on your part. Someone needs to review the returned survey, and sometimes ask additional questions to make an effective evaluation. Sometimes a D&B report is a good idea to confirm their stability. The survey is just a tool to aid in the evaluation.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#5
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Do I need a device specific questionnaire?
We have had a number of discussions around supplier surveys (questionnaires). My professional experience is that such surveys are, for the most part, meaningless and useless, simply because most suppliers will lie through their teeth, before answering the surveys in a truthful manner, if that casts a shadow about their capability.

In your case, you mentioned that such surveys are just the beginning of the supplier approval process. So, it might not be as critical as for other organizations which solely rely on these questionnaires.

Concerning your question if the surveys should be customized to the type of product your suppliers support you with, yes, it does make sense. However it is not a requirement of the 13485 Standard.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
We have had a number of discussions around supplier surveys (questionnaires). My professional experience is that such surveys are, for the most part, meaningless and useless, simply because most suppliers will lie through their teeth, before answering the surveys in a truthful manner, if that casts a shadow about their capability.

In your case, you mentioned that such surveys are just the beginning of the supplier approval process. So, it might not be as critical as for other organizations which solely rely on these questionnaires.

Concerning your question if the surveys should be customized to the type of product your suppliers support you with, yes, it does make sense. However it is not a requirement of the 13485 Standard.
Absolutely... The questionner is only an information gathering method. Going further, Audits at supplier, sample and pilot runs, Third party or external laboratory verifications, and many more such steps need to be done in order to qualify or approve the supplier, the extent of checks and controls being in line with the complexity of the supplied part or process.........
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#7
The questionner is only an information gathering method.
You would be surprised to find out how many organizations rely solely on a single-page survey to "qualify" a new vendor. Risk management is a foreign concept for them.

All the other value-added steps you listed are non-existent in many, many organizations' supply monitoring processes, because it cost money to perform most of them.
 
J

Jim-S

#8
Thanks for all of the feedback! I think the reason that I'm getting frustrated by this situation is that this questionnaire is only our starting point. Our auditor is also going to audit the each site. The questionnaire is only a starting point. Yes, the questionnaire needs to be updated for devices, but the changes seem rather minor to me. - To be honest, I'm running into this type of situation with the entire project. One person says 'Go!' and then the next person says "Stop!".
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#9
We have had a number of discussions around supplier surveys (questionnaires). My professional experience is that such surveys are, for the most part, meaningless and useless, simply because most suppliers will lie through their teeth, before answering the surveys in a truthful manner, if that casts a shadow about their capability.

In your case, you mentioned that such surveys are just the beginning of the supplier approval process. So, it might not be as critical as for other organizations which solely rely on these questionnaires.

Concerning your question if the surveys should be customized to the type of product your suppliers support you with, yes, it does make sense. However it is not a requirement of the 13485 Standard.
Absolutely... The questionner is only an information gathering method. Going further, Audits at supplier, sample and pilot runs, Third party or external laboratory verifications, and many more such steps need to be done in order to qualify or approve the supplier, the extent of checks and controls being in line with the complexity of the supplied part or process.........
You would be surprised to find out how many organizations rely solely on a single-page survey to "qualify" a new vendor. Risk management is a foreign concept for them.

All the other value-added steps you listed are non-existent in many, many organizations' supply monitoring processes, because it cost money to perform most of them.
Wow! I am surprised you believe so many suppliers lie and cheat on the surveys.

My suspicion (anecdotal - no hard documentation) is customers send out these surveys like junk mail to dozens of prospective suppliers BEFORE establishing a more discriminating selection process than sending a questionnaire to every supplier for the product or service who happens to have a listing in the Thomas Register.

I also suspect suppliers who fib on the questionnaire are aware the customer does absolutely zero followup to confirm the answers.

It is probably beyond the scope of this thread :)topic:) to point out a 13 page questionnaire is way too long for most suppliers and not nearly long enough for a select few suppliers. (As a supplier, I NEVER filled out such a questionnaire until I had a long talk with an official at such customer which satisfied me the questionnaire was a real step to getting actual business, rather than the dubious honor of being an "approved" supplier, but getting no business. Most times, after such talk, the questionnaire found its way into the round file where we stored paper for recycling.)

Regardless of my opinion or anyone else's on the worth and efficacy of a 13 page questionnaire, I agree ISO 13485 does not specifically address the issue of "how" an organization should go about the approval process of suppliers. That said, however, I also suspect the auditor had severe misgivings about the followup to such a questionnaire and did not see documented evidence the questionnaire and any answers on it (whether true facts or outright lies by the supplier) had any probative value in establishing the relative worth of a supplier to the customer's supply chain.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
Thanks for all of the feedback! I think the reason that I'm getting frustrated by this situation is that this questionnaire is only our starting point. Our auditor is also going to audit the each site. The questionnaire is only a starting point. Yes, the questionnaire needs to be updated for devices, but the changes seem rather minor to me. - To be honest, I'm running into this type of situation with the entire project. One person says 'Go!' and then the next person says "Stop!".
Jim, You actually need to GO >> STOP >> CHECK >> CORRECT >> GO >> and so on.... That is the great PDCA cycle on the basis of which the quality management system is made.
Good luck ...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Supplier Development Process failed - Question regarding sub-suppiler audits IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
lanley liao Question regarding the calibration of monitoring and measure equipment. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
D Question regarding "storage and distribution" ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Question regarding customer feedback process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Question regarding ECO process, specifically for Life Science products and defining form fit and function ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
F ISO 13485 8.2.3 Reporting to regulatory authorities: Question regarding a procedure for this clause. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
C Question regarding Quality Manual Content and Specificity ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
optomist1 Generic question regarding Two Way ANOVA Results Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
apestate Question on wording in DOD RFQ regarding ISO 9000 Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 7
N ASME B89.1.13 question regarding Resolution and Maximum Permissible Error General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Question regarding Mandatory Procedures and Manual AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
P Question in auditing regarding CAR (Corrective Action) Logs Internal Auditing 7
Q Question regarding O-ring application for water proofing a device Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
J Question regarding Device Master Records & Specification Developers 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
J Cancellation of Specifications - Question regarding cancelled specifications Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
ScottK ASME B&PVC Section VIII Div 1 question regarding "Seal" Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0
K Auditor's Question Regarding TS16949 Clause 7.5.2 - How vague can an auditor be IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
S Question regarding document control - Control EVERY version of the same graphic? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
A Question regarding TS16949 auditor rules 3.3 - Different auditors IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C Question Regarding MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) - Pass / Fail Criteria tests Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
E Question Regarding OHSAS 18001 Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 3
C Gauge R&R Question Using Minitab Software 1
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
K Question on MDR classification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
D Question on equipment - when to use reference only or research only stickers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D Work Instruction Question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Clinical Decision Support Software Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
John C. Abnet VDA 6.3 - Question 7.3 - "blocking of parts" VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 6
D Approved supplier list - Distributors question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Equipment Register and PM question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
D Equipment Register related question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Study sign off question / responsibilities ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Qualification question - ISO 13485 - Setting up a small lab Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
M Question for Auditors - "Off the Record" Conversation? General Auditing Discussions 14
R Accelerated Aging - Creating test samples - Implantable medical device Question Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
A Question on Authorized Representative in Malaysia Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
D Limited Scope for second site Question? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
I ISO 2233:2000 Question - Medical Device Shipping/Transportation Validation Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
Anonymous16-2 Labeling Question (Dietary Supplements/Food) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
T Question for: Cg & Cgk calculation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
N ASL Question for GitHub ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
hogheavenfarm GDT Flatness measurement question Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
A Question on ISO 14001:2015 - Are annual audits required? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 11
dinaroxentool Question about FDA Classification of a Device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
J Another DFAR question 252.225-7009 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
F Conflict Mineral Smelter Question RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 8
R NRTL - Scope Question - Off-the-Shelf Plug In IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
D API 6A Certification Question Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 4
dinaroxentool Question about qualification as a medical device or accessory in Europe EU Medical Device Regulations 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom