Questionable Audit Finding about Revision Levels of Product Manual CD's

J

Janselm

#1
We recently had our external audit and our auditor came up with a finding that I personally do not believe is a real non-conformance or problem.

Our shipping department keeps CD copies of all documentation (product manuals, spec sheets, etc.) for each product. Each of the documents on the CD has its own revision level. Each CD is named in accordance to their respective product. When shipping goes to package a product, the correct CD is placed in the shipping container. Our documentation department keeps track of what is on the CD's and in the event that one of the documents is revised they personally go to shipping, dispose of the old CD's and give them new ones.

Our auditor claims that this is a non-conformance because the CD's themselves are required to have their own revision level.

Here is the exact finding:

[FONT=&quot]Requirement:[/FONT][FONT=&quot] Section 6.3.2 of Procedure 7 states documents are controlled by a revision number.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Non Conformance: [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Documents used were not controlled as required by the procedure. There was no revision indicator.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Evidence: [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Product manual CD's in shipping.[/FONT]

To me, since the documents on the CD's themselves contain a revision number, the CD itself does not need one. I don't believe there is any need for the CD's to have a revision number since
1: They are not documents so the procedure doesn't really apply
2: The content of the CD's is controlled in a fashion that will prevent obsolete documents to be shipped out with the product.

Any suggestions on what I should do?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Reg Morrison

#2
Re: Bupkis Audit Finding about Revision Levels of Product Manual CD's

Any suggestions on what I should do?
Yes, drop the CD's altogether and let customers know where (online) they should go to download any document they need. IMHO, a much more elegant, cost-effective, modern and environmental-friendly solution.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Re: Bupkis Audit Finding about Revision Levels of Product Manual CD's

Yes, drop the CD's altogether and let customers know where (online) they should go to download any document they need. IMHO, a much more elegant, cost-effective, modern and environmental-friendly solution.
A great long term solution unless your customer base is not fully up on the latest technology like an internet connection.

The OP's issue is that their internal procedures require documents to have a revision number. The auditor interpreted the CD as a document. In reality, the CD is not in and of itself a document. It contains (electronic) documents that do have . The CD is a delivery and storage device and that doesn't require version control per their internal procedures. The gap lies in the interpretation of what the CD is.

The standard of course only requires version control such that outdated versions are not inadvertantly used. The OP can demonstrate that they meet this requirement.

there are a few options here
  • argue with the auditor
  • chagne the internal procedure to better define what a document is (my personal preference)
  • agree with the auditor and put a version number on the CD

yes its a picky finding. It should have been a point of rational discussion. but it wasn't
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#4
Re: Bupkis Audit Finding about Revision Levels of Product Manual CD's

<snip> Our documentation department keeps track of what is on the CD's and in the event that one of the documents is revised they personally go to shipping, dispose of the old CD's and give them new ones. <snip>
I have to agree with the auditor if the CD has manuals and/or other controlled documents on it. How else do you know what revision document(s) are on the CD?

If they personally do this and have records of having done it, you can call the auditor on it. But...

I have gone through that route where I have gotten outdated documents on CDs that didn't have a revision date or other way to tell what was on the CD.

I do agree with Reg - Put them on the internet and put something in or on the box with the URL to the documents. My last 2 computers do not even have CD/DVD drives.

I do understand Bev's comment - That your customer base may not be fully up on the latest technology like an internet connection, but in that case... There's no guarantee they have a CD drive to begin with.

My opinion - Paper or internet URL. CDs and DVDs are dinosaurs. Remember floppy disks? I still have an 8" floppy around here somewhere as a "momento" of the 1980's...
 
Last edited:

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#5
Re: Bupkis Audit Finding about Revision Levels of Product Manual CD's

Some of our end users (military folks in the field) may not have reliable access to the web. For that reason we periodically choose to maintain both online and CD versions.

" If they personally do this and have records of having done it, you can call the auditor on it. But...

I have gone through that route where I have gotten outdated documents on CDs that didn't have a revision date or other way to tell what was on the CD. "

My experience as well. Doing that purge of obsolete CDs I believe, maintaining records to prove it is unlikely.

Besides, how much burden does it add to put a rev level on the CD ? Assuming, of course, that the artwork for the CD label is already tracked.
 
J

Janselm

#6
Unfortunately, putting it up on the internet is not an option for us. Our management is very "cautious" of who can get our documentation and how they can get it. With only a few real competitors in our business (RF Matrices) they are worried that having our manuals on the internet may expose them to our competitors.

What we ended up doing is giving the CD's rev levels and each one will have a log of exactly what documents and what revision levels of those documents are contained on the CD's. The log rev level and the CD rev level will always match. Our shipping personnel will compare the revision of the CD with the electronic revision of the log each time before shipping to assure they match. We submitted the action plan and our auditor accepted it.

Thanks everyone for your help.
 

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Good choice. Only today we were discussing a disk we received from a large computer equipment manufacturer that was made up of a random collection of uncontrolled files.
 

dgriffith

Quite Involved in Discussions
#8
Unfortunately, putting it up on the internet is not an option for us. Our management is very "cautious" of who can get our documentation and how they can get it. With only a few real competitors in our business (RF Matrices) they are worried that having our manuals on the internet may expose them to our competitors.
Depending on the size of the company, a firewalled intra-net would work. It's what we use. Then, the official copy is on-line, and anything printed for use becomes uncontrolled--just tell the auditor that the controlled version is located on-line and be able to demonstrate that you can find it.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Acceptance Criteria - ISO 9001:2008 Clause 8.2.4 - Questionable Audit Finding? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 40
Mikey324 Questionable Audit Findings after Rules 4th Edition Release IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
E CAR (Corrective Action Report) with questionable Root Cause ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
T Questionable President - John Quincy Adams Brain Teasers and Puzzles 18
I ISO 9001: 2008 Implementation - Quality Manual First -> Questionable approach ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
A Alternative to on site audit in China EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J Help to understand and response to API AAR during the re-certification audit Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 17
B Internal audit checklist Internal Auditing 5
V Internal Audit Software IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J Internal Audit Schedule IATF Internal Auditing 3
Mikey324 External calibration - Finding in our 3rd party audit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 58
C ISO 14001 Internal Audit - Opportunity for Improvement ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
J Stage 2 audit initial cert, few data points ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Corrections not allowed during audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
P Looking to outsource Internal Audit - MDSAP competent auditor needed Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 9
R GFE Audit - Violation? GFE Location Controls AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
D Help Me. Non conformitty in External Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
M How to answer ISO9001:2015 audit finding of old revisions of documents being used? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B UKRP to what level should you audit Class I Technical Documentation? UK Medical Device Regulations 0
I Audit is tomorrow but I refused to participate Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 16
I ISO 17025:2017 / ANAB 3125 - Articulating / Communicating Risks vis-a-vis Audit Findings ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
D Verify Audit Trail of SaaS system Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
D Re-labeler - audit the supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Outsourced Internal Audit requirements for Aerospace Suppliers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 21
A PPAP question for audit APQP and PPAP 16
D Number of people to be interviewed during an internal audit? Internal Auditing 10
B Gamma Quarterly Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
A Anxiety - ISO Re-registration Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 69
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Q Easy CARs for Internal Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Quarterly Dose Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
H When is a SOC 2 audit necessary? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 5
J NCR- Failure of contract review process - NADCAP audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
D Special IATF audit of sub-supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
A Internal audit plan and processes for ISO 14001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
C API Q1 internal audit report Internal Auditing 3
P Filled in F48/F49 for internal audit ISO 17025:2017 Internal Auditing 2
A IRIS audit - Discussion about Special Processes General Auditing Discussions 11
J Internal audit random sampling methodology Internal Auditing 2
D Major NC from last audit not fixed not sure how to fix General Auditing Discussions 10
X Sample SOC2 audit report (or a redacted one) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
D Lead time to schedule an ISO 13485 audit General Auditing Discussions 2
G Organizing internal audit program for an Integrated QHSE Management System Internal Auditing 13
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
W How do you phrase your internal audit questions? Internal Auditing 3
Z Steps to take before an MDSAP audit for Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
V Csv, excel format - audit trail file of HPLC system ( Empower, openlab, EZchrom or any other ) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom