J
Janselm
We recently had our external audit and our auditor came up with a finding that I personally do not believe is a real non-conformance or problem.
Our shipping department keeps CD copies of all documentation (product manuals, spec sheets, etc.) for each product. Each of the documents on the CD has its own revision level. Each CD is named in accordance to their respective product. When shipping goes to package a product, the correct CD is placed in the shipping container. Our documentation department keeps track of what is on the CD's and in the event that one of the documents is revised they personally go to shipping, dispose of the old CD's and give them new ones.
Our auditor claims that this is a non-conformance because the CD's themselves are required to have their own revision level.
Here is the exact finding:
[FONT="]Requirement:[/FONT][FONT="] Section 6.3.2 of Procedure 7 states documents are controlled by a revision number.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Non Conformance: [/FONT][FONT="]Documents used were not controlled as required by the procedure. There was no revision indicator.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Evidence: [/FONT][FONT="]Product manual CD's in shipping.[/FONT]
To me, since the documents on the CD's themselves contain a revision number, the CD itself does not need one. I don't believe there is any need for the CD's to have a revision number since
1: They are not documents so the procedure doesn't really apply
2: The content of the CD's is controlled in a fashion that will prevent obsolete documents to be shipped out with the product.
Any suggestions on what I should do?
Our shipping department keeps CD copies of all documentation (product manuals, spec sheets, etc.) for each product. Each of the documents on the CD has its own revision level. Each CD is named in accordance to their respective product. When shipping goes to package a product, the correct CD is placed in the shipping container. Our documentation department keeps track of what is on the CD's and in the event that one of the documents is revised they personally go to shipping, dispose of the old CD's and give them new ones.
Our auditor claims that this is a non-conformance because the CD's themselves are required to have their own revision level.
Here is the exact finding:
[FONT="]Requirement:[/FONT][FONT="] Section 6.3.2 of Procedure 7 states documents are controlled by a revision number.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Non Conformance: [/FONT][FONT="]Documents used were not controlled as required by the procedure. There was no revision indicator.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Evidence: [/FONT][FONT="]Product manual CD's in shipping.[/FONT]
To me, since the documents on the CD's themselves contain a revision number, the CD itself does not need one. I don't believe there is any need for the CD's to have a revision number since
1: They are not documents so the procedure doesn't really apply
2: The content of the CD's is controlled in a fashion that will prevent obsolete documents to be shipped out with the product.
Any suggestions on what I should do?