Readiness review - Kindly give me some pointers on how to face this audit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrews
  • Start date Start date
A

Andrews

Our stage 1 audit is coming up.

Can the experts / veterans on the forums kindly give me some pointers on how to face this audit and what are the things to be made ready before the audit?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Hope the following will help.

There is still confusion on what TS:02 prospects need to submit for the documentation review. Below is a comprehensive description of all items:
The organization shall provide the following documentation to the CB for review, and for use in planning the audit (see format in the IATF Guidance to ISO/TS 16949:2002):
1) Quality manual (for each site to be audited) -
The key words in this requirement are "for each site to be audited". If a client has 40 sites that are audited they need 40 manuals. There is nothing to say that that one of those manuals cannot be a "Corporate Manual" but the requirement is clear, a manual is required for each site audited.
Section 4.2.2c) requires the sequence of processes to be defined in the manual, it is almost impossible to have all the processes in a multisite organization defined in one manual.
Acceptable alternatives:
a) It is acceptable to have one requirements manual for corporate as long as it is referenced that all sites will submit their processes on an individual basis. TS requires audits to be process based, therefore no one can do an audit prior to receiving the processes at the site to be audited.
b) Modular companies where corporate insists that the same processes be performed at each site. The product and customer are also consistent as well.
2) Internal audit and management review planning and results from previous twelve months.
This only needs to be a summary. Audit logs, Audit schedules, Management review minutes. It is required that a full cycle of management review and internal audits occur prior to the on-site visit. DCX defines a full cycle as all the requirements of TS.
Some Items you should be looking for evidence of:
a) Customer requirements are included in the internal audit process
b) Process and Product audits are conducted in addition to management system audits
c) Non-conformances are being closed out

d) Audit results, corrective actions, customer satisfaction, are discussed during management reviews
e) management review contain action items with responsible person and due date
f) Action items are being followed up on
3) List of qualified internal auditors - A list of names is not appropriate. Evidence of training on the TS requirements is required. Some OEM specific requirements require outside training (Ford), or require evidence of specific skills.
4) List of customer specific requirements - Customer requirements for OEM's and Tier One manufacturers can be found on the web. If the client is tier 3 they must get their customers (tier 2) requirements. Multi site registration may have facilities that only supply internal customers. They are still subject to submitting customer requirements. Beware that they may be responsible for specific OEM requirements as well and need to be aware of them.
Clients that are not aware of these requirements should raise doubt in the auditors mind as to the readiness of the site. More information should be requested to determine if the client has integrated customer specifics into their process.
Customer requirements must also include levels for cost, quality, and delivery. These requirements can be found in:
- GM's creativity Bid List
- Ford's SIMS report
- Original Bid
- PO's
5) Customer complaints status
A log and a positive trend is minimum evidence.
Customer complaints include: PRR's, CS1, CS2, NCT's, PRISM, etc...
7) Operational performance trends for the previous 12 months, minimum.
It is up to the client to define what trends they want to track however trends must include customer satisfaction, and internal trends must be related to (8.2.1.1) customer satisfaction. All OEMs and medium to large Tier one automotive suppliers issue supplier performance data, and must be requested before completing the document review. Auditors cannot accept data collected internally in lieu of customer supplied data, because the method of measurement may not be the same, or the client may have a different perception of the suppliers performance.
Negative trends indicate a customer is not ready. A "spike" is not considered a trend, at least three months is a trend that include positive and negative.
 
I'll keep it simple......

Do what you're supposed to do the way you're supposed to do it.

All other advise is gibberish

What advice were you given by your chosen registration body? Follow it.
 
Last edited:
Document Review Requirements

If you refer to the IATF guidance document that is associated with TS16949:2002, you will find in the back a 'Readiness Evaluation Worksheet". This is the document that the Cert Body auditor has to complete.

If you construct a file of evidence around this, then the auditor will have everything that is needed:

Essentially:

Some general info, scope, design responsibility etc....
Process Maps (including 7 TS procedures)
12 months performance data
12 months Management Review
12 months Internal Audits
Internal Auditor Qualiications
Quality Manual.

I too have a doc review shortly and have spent a good few weeks collating the relevant evidence. I speak from experience having been through this once before.

I've not posted here before and not sure what others have said.

Feel free to email me direct if you want more information.

have fun.


Ramesh.Manga at Futaba-Tenneco.co.uk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stage one audit

Looking through the " Rules for achieving IATF recognition " ( second version )you can find following list interesting as a guide for the stage one audit.

Best regards,

Antoine
 

Attachments

Thanks Bob, mangard,antoine for the help.

This information will be not only useful for me but also for any prospective companies going in for TS2.

Bob, Your reply was very comprehensive.
 
Readiness Review

The readiness review is like laying the foundation down for your quality system.

You have to have the foundation to even do the registeration audit.
 
Readiness review is a pre-registration audit. The theory behind it is if done you will be more "assured" of passing the registration audit. Does it help? Yes. Can you not do it and save the $$ and still pass registration? Yes.
 
It's the old Pre-Assessment. I agree it is 'smart' to do - Especially to get the 'flavour' of your registrar. I also acknowledge it is not 'necessary' per se. In the early 1990's I advised against them, but since around 1996 I have advised clients to go through them.

In a way, I see that as the 'courtship' audit.
 
Back
Top Bottom