Record Management - Does the QMS need to control templates of records?

#1
Hello everyone, this forum has been a huge support for me while planning and revising existing procedures in my company!
I've only recently started in quality as a total novice and it's been a learning curve till now, I've figured out key procedures that are essential for the standard our company follows (ISO 9001:2015). Although I can't wrap my head around a practical and easy to follow procedure for Record management.

Our company is a manufacturer of cosmetics so we have a lot of records for maintaining batch manufacturing information, packing and filling details, etc. Now I have obtained templates for these existing records and which are currently under no control, the employees sometimes change the template without following a proper change control procedure.

My question is - how do I implement an effective record management system?
Along with details such as Template no, Issue date, Revision no, and revision date, do I need to get a "signature" as approval for the template?
and finally - Do I need to control these templates under document control (master copy, controlled copies, reference copies)?

Essential to add: our company doesnt have a software or online system, so I'm going to have to maintain all these templates manually.
Cheers!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Hello everyone, this forum has been a huge support for me while planning and revising existing procedures in my company!
I've only recently started in quality as a total novice and it's been a learning curve till now, I've figured out key procedures that are essential for the standard our company follows (ISO 9001:2015). Although I can't wrap my head around a practical and easy to follow procedure for Record management.

Our company is a manufacturer of cosmetics so we have a lot of records for maintaining batch manufacturing information, packing and filling details, etc. Now I have obtained templates for these existing records and which are currently under no control, the employees sometimes change the template without following a proper change control procedure.

My question is - how do I implement an effective record management system?
Along with details such as Template no, Issue date, Revision no, and revision date, do I need to get a "signature" as approval for the template?
and finally - Do I need to control these templates under document control (master copy, controlled copies, reference copies)?

Essential to add: our company doesnt have a software or online system, so I'm going to have to maintain all these templates manually.
Cheers!
Hi Bonsaissi

Start with simple things you can change, set up a Document Change Request form or log, nothing too complicated, I have attached my DCR form, I don't keep a log but I keep a Master doc spreadsheet,
 

Attachments

Randy

Super Moderator
#3
MS Word has all you need to control any document in use especially a Template.

What you control and how you control it is your decision, your QMS doesn't control anything you do through the effective use of the QMS you establish according to the requirements contained within it.

Quit trying to overthink a simple activity and make things more complicated than they need to be.
 

John Broomfield

Leader
Super Moderator
#4
No signature is required by ISO 9001 on any controlled document.

It has to be reviewed and approved before issue. And users need to know they have the applicable issue.

These document controls include your templates (aka forms).
 

qualprod

Trusted Information Resource
#5
Hello everyone, this forum has been a huge support for me while planning and revising existing procedures in my company!
I've only recently started in quality as a total novice and it's been a learning curve till now, I've figured out key procedures that are essential for the standard our company follows (ISO 9001:2015). Although I can't wrap my head around a practical and easy to follow procedure for Record management.

Our company is a manufacturer of cosmetics so we have a lot of records for maintaining batch manufacturing information, packing and filling details, etc. Now I have obtained templates for these existing records and which are currently under no control, the employees sometimes change the template without following a proper change control procedure.

My question is - how do I implement an effective record management system?
Along with details such as Template no, Issue date, Revision no, and revision date, do I need to get a "signature" as approval for the template?
and finally - Do I need to control these templates under document control (master copy, controlled copies, reference copies)?

Essential to add: our company doesnt have a software or online system, so I'm going to have to maintain all these templates manually.
Cheers!
Maybe you are overthinking this
First off, define exactly what needs a record, based on the Standard , your requirements or what your customers need.
Once is defined, they are documents which need control according to 7.5.
The important thing is to identify why is the real use of such records, if they add value, if not, you are overloading your qms turning it in a non effective system.
Remember in this version, the standard requires very few records.
Hope this helps.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Things should be controlled as close to the point of use as possible. So let the employees change the templates as they see fit without a lot of bureaucracy. Sounds like all you need to do is have the template name and revision print out, which word can easily do. And keep an updated list of the current revision in use. Don't over complicate it. Good luck.
 
#10
This is a topic that is starting to show a lot of heartburn for our management team.

They want a clear explanation of when to control forms. For example in our system, we have a blank production inspection form, this form is the base template on how the layout needs to be for adding the required inputs from the operator. They're wanting to prefill forms for each individual part number that is being machined and control each of these forms. So the original blank form is already controlled and then having a prefilled form for each part number has its own control.

Is this the correct process? Or is this adding too many headaches to the system and we should only be controlling the blank form? If you were to only control the blank for as the base template for the design and layout, are the prefilled forms for different part numbers considered uncontrolled until filled in to become a record?

Thanks for any information. Everyone has their own idea of these technicalities here and I'm trying to move us to a straight forward, this is how it's needing to be to conform.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S DMR (Device Master Record) Management and Index questions Other US Medical Device Regulations 18
B Responsibilities for Record and Document Management, Development and Control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
A ISOXpress Software - Record and revision management - Anyone Used it??? Software Quality Assurance 7
A Record of Inputs to Management Review Meeting (MRM) Management Review Meetings and related Processes 15
G Good ISO 9001:2000 documentation and record management software Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 8
A Configuration Management - Part history - How to record changes Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
C Bulk Record Retention Review Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
R Device Master Record Vigilance ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
S Record of Disciplinary Action ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
E PMS record retention time for legacy devices EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Sam Lazzara Record signature requirements in proposed FDA 21 CFR 820 QMS Regulation 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
A ISO 13485 Calibration Requirements- Assess and Record validity Previous measuring results ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
G How to Record Informal Testing (Not Verification/Validation) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 15
M How to record the effects of adjacent systems (shown in boundary diagram) in the AIAG-VDA DFMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 0
S Record approval- Signatures required ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
B Acquired Medical Device Product Line - Documentation Requirements for Device Master Record ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
D Device Master Record (DMR) checklist ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
G How to record Regulations and Standards as Design Inputs? Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
M Record Retention Verbiage Needed for "Lifetime" Retention EU Medical Device Regulations 14
M Sample record for verification performed by importers before placing a device on the market EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S IVD Device History Record ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
E Record Retention - Raw Material (Steel Certs) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3
E Procedure ( SOP) for Device Master Record ( DMR ) and for Device History Record (DHR)? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
J Records Control - Does each individual record need to be numbered? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2
S Records - Do's and don't' of record entries (FDA - 21 CFR 820) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 13
N Importer of record - Europe EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Question for Auditors - "Off the Record" Conversation? General Auditing Discussions 14
C GUDID Device record history Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
D IATF16949 7.5.3.2.1 Record Retention - Our Product or Customer Product? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
S How do you record your Nonconforming product? Batch production of staged processes Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
I Can a document (form) approval record be separate? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
M Defining and Documenting Record Retention CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
Q Forms Master List versus Record Matrix ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
S Service record requirements for Non-Serviceable Medical Devices CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
R No design history file or device master record ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Sam Lazzara Medical Device File (MDF per 13485:2016 4.2.3) versus FDA Device Master Record (DMR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
I What kind of information needs to be in a calibration record? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 25
E ISO 9001:2015 - Record requirements for out of calibration tool ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 28
N ISO 13485 Quality Record Retention Period ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M Loss of a Quality Record - FDA Inspection Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
B MDSAP 8.2.6 CH6 task 17 ANVISA 16/2013 3.2.1 - Label History in Device history record Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
I Training records and levels - When does training NOT need a record? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
Gman2 Quality Record Retention (Internal Audits, CA's) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
R Are DMR (device master record) and DHR (device history record) inspected by FDA or audited by an NB ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
N When to record values if a spec for a mfg process is set Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
S Mobile app data privacy - Length of record retention in a software app Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 1
S Foreign Manufacturer and DMR - Who keeps the DMR (Device Master Record)? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M Medical Device News Health Canada - Scientific Advisory Panel on Software as a Medical Device (SAP-SaMD) - Record of Proceedings – January 26, 2018 Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
J Training Record Template and tracking Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
S DMR (Device Master Record) for Medical Device Software IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom