I agree...A 6 month frequency is my preference as well, however, I may have trouble selling that here. It does look like the costs are less doing it once a year and cost IS likely to be the driver for management here.
Before I launch into this, however, I want to be sure there aren't some hidden benefits to the company with doing the yearly route besides cost.
If there isn't any other benefit, then I will need to cost justify the additional expense for the 6 month surveilances.
I think, from my records review, that the three year reassessment cost is almost twice what it would be if I were doing surveillances every 6 months.
Is that true for others doing the yearly surveillances?