Regrinding Material - Verify whether a product contains any regrinding material

V

vivkrish

Hello All,

I have some clarification. We are purchasing plastic parts from suppliers.

I need to verify whether the product contains any regrinding material or not. If yes how much they mixed with virgin material (Mixing ratio).

How can I qualify my products as above condition.

At what test can we conclude.


Thanks,
Vivkrish.
 

kuyakut

Involved In Discussions
If it is molded components , its a bit tough to determine how much regrind they use.
It always boils down to your supplier honesty and integrity.
One way is to test mechanical properties of the molded plastic but you need a very sophisticated equipment to be able to determine if they use regrind on the molded parts.
 
L

locutus

It always boils down to your supplier honesty and integrity.
+1 basically they have to certify that it is virgin material. As mentioned you can find out if mixed by doing chemical analysis like NMR, but costly and will probably have to test much material to determine. Does you own specification require virgin materials or mix is allowed? Working in the medical device industry, usually only virgin material is allowed, but other industries I know will allow mix with a ratio sometimes not specified. The issue arises that once plastic is heated up, then ground down, and heated up again, it loses some of its properties. I am not a materials expert, but had a really, really smart materials guy spend 4 hours telling me about plastics ... then at the end, said, "do you want to go get a whiskey? i need one after that." lol.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
OK, time to clarify some things.

The presence of any significant percentage of regrind can be detected quite simply because every moulding cycle will manifest in some degradation (polymer chain scision), which in turn will manifest in lower MFI (Melt Flow Index).

To check a sample’s MFI you don’t need large samples, the method is not complicated, the equipment is not that sophisticated, not that expensive and not that rare. If it’s a recurring situation you can simply buy a basic MFI analyser; otherwise contact a lab that provides this (basic) service. This will tell you with reasonable confidence whether the article was made from pure virgin material or includes a significant percentage of regrind (please remember that some degradation should be expected in any but an ideal moulding process, so the MFI of a moulded sample will almost never be exactly the same as that of a 100% virgin raw material).

What’s complicated is determining the exact percentage of regrind. That would need calibrating first, ie moulding samples at different known regrind percentages and finding out their respective MFIs. Of course, in order to be a valid test method a whole host of issues would need to be accounted for (as per usual when developing a test method) and some statistical rigor would be required. Another complication is material having gone through more than one regrind cycle (a natural result in a process that uses in-line regrinding).

Basic MFI is a crude tool; it’s not that accurate and the resolution is limited. I’d normally recommend it only for saying whether regrind has been used or not. It’s good because it’s simple, quick and not too expensive. However, there are additional, more sophisticated methods such as DSC and DMA, that can tell you much more about the polymer’s molecular weight (which will tell you about degradation), and are more accurate. Those methods do require more expensive equipment and some expertise in running the tests and interpreting the results; however, they are normally available from any large lab dealing with polymer testing. I didn’t check with UL (no affiliation here) but I guess they offer such testing.
 
Last edited:
V

vivkrish

Best bet is to ask them. You would need a pretty sophisticated lab and testing to determine. Not sure.
What are the testing equipments we need to know the regrinding material presence and the percentage of the regrinding material.

Thanks,
Vivkrish.
 
V

vivkrish

OK, time to clarify some things.

The presence of any significant percentage of regrind can be detected quite simply because every moulding cycle will manifest in some degradation (polymer chain scision), which in turn will manifest in lower MFI (Melt Flow Index).

To check a sample’s MFI you don’t need large samples, the method is not complicated, the equipment is not that sophisticated, not that expensive and not that rare. If it’s a recurring situation you can simply buy a basic MFI analyser; otherwise contact a lab that provides this (basic) service. This will tell you with reasonable confidence whether the article was made from pure virgin material or includes a significant percentage of regrind (please remember that some degradation should be expected in any but an ideal moulding process, so the MFI of a moulded sample will almost never be exactly the same as that of a 100% virgin raw material).

What’s complicated is determining the exact percentage of regrind. That would need calibrating first, ie moulding samples at different known regrind percentages and finding out their respective MFIs. Of course, in order to be a valid test method a whole host of issues would need to be accounted for (as per usual when developing a test method) and some statistical rigor would be required. Another complication is material having gone through more than one regrind cycle (a natural result in a process that uses in-line regrinding).

Basic MFI is a crude tool; it’s not that accurate and the resolution is limited. I’d normally recommend it only for saying whether regrind has been used or not. It’s good because it’s simple, quick and not too expensive. However, there are additional, more sophisticated methods such as DSC and DMA, that can tell you much more about the polymer’s molecular weight (which will tell you about degradation), and are more accurate. Those methods do require more expensive equipment and some expertise in running the tests and interpreting the results; however, they are normally available from any large lab dealing with polymer testing. I didn’t check with UL (no affiliation here) but I guess they offer such testing.
Hello,

We Have DSC and MFI instrument in our factory. We do the test with both method, but we can't able to identify. If I purposely prepare and test the regrinding material also, we get the tolerable results in DSC. MFI concern I found some deviations in results.

Thanks,
Vivkrish.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
What are the testing equipments we need to know the regrinding material presence and the percentage of the regrinding material.

Thanks,
Vivkrish.

No clue. Like someone said every reuse degrades the material. You would need someone who could pick up that degradation.
 
V

vivkrish

+1 basically they have to certify that it is virgin material. As mentioned you can find out if mixed by doing chemical analysis like NMR, but costly and will probably have to test much material to determine. Does you own specification require virgin materials or mix is allowed? Working in the medical device industry, usually only virgin material is allowed, but other industries I know will allow mix with a ratio sometimes not specified. The issue arises that once plastic is heated up, then ground down, and heated up again, it loses some of its properties. I am not a materials expert, but had a really, really smart materials guy spend 4 hours telling me about plastics ... then at the end, said, "do you want to go get a whiskey? i need one after that." lol.
Hello Locutus,

I have gone through NMR technique and as well as visited a research body who is doing NMR test. They also not much confident that by NMR we can find regrinding material presence in our product.

Please explain how can we identify the regrinding material presence in our product by NMR?

I am waiting for your valuable support.

Thanks,
Vivkrish.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
V Regrinding Material - Thermal properties Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Sidney Vianna AS9100 News AS9101 Change Presentation Material AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
I Prototype Material NCR ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Gamma Radiation for Packing Material Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 0
J Raw Material Supplier Site Change US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
K Alternatives to Metal Foil for touch current measurement of enclosures made of insulating material. IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
C New 510(k) for non-patient contacting material change US Medical Device Regulations 2
J API 5CT - NDE for Accessory Material - Section 10.15.11 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
GreatNate Looking for Hazardous Material Management Plan example or HMMP assessment checklist Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
G Ergonomic issue caused by supplier material ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M Material Heat Number / Lot Number ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
adztesla Change in material vendor - Medical device ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Q Full Material Disclosure and IPC-1752A RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1
K Critical Material Vendors: Distributors Vs Manufacturers and Supply Agreements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
G Any training material on the 1-10-100 rule? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
P AS9100 and Raw Material Traceability AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
M ASQ certification study material Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
H IEC 61010-1 Clause No. 10.5 Resistance to Heat - Sub Clause 10.5.3 Insulating Material CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 6
M Biocompatible material ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
H Pre-production units & Purchasing/Supplier/Material controls ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
T Testing for proving food safety on USP class vi material RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 0
Q SUS Material Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
R Finding Equivalent Material Information Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
W Nonconforming-Material Process Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
Stoic Details of Operational Qualification (OQ) test design for plastic extrusion processes, effect of material property noise, and GHTF/SG3/N99-10 US Medical Device Regulations 2
T Control of Nonconforming Material AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
DuncanGibbons Safe-Life, Fail-Safe and Damage Tolerant approaches and their relevant material property requirements Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 0
T Shrinkage Testing for EPDM Material Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 5
M Preparing a document for Raw Material of Medical Device EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J ISO 13485- 8.3.1 Non-conforming material high volume ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Awais Taking Pictures of Outbound Material - In the Manufacturing Shop floor Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
Q G11 material Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
M Medical Device Marketing Material - Control of Social Media 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
M Origin of Material Review Board AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
D Raw Material Expirations Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
W What is okay to use as a reference material for ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
J Scrap Material Scale Calibration Required? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
R Revalidation under VDmax25 following material change ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J Example of a defined procedure for carrying out Material Review Board (MRB) Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
S Advice on how to reduce overhead of handling non-conforming material Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
R AS9102 FAI Change in Material / Process Supplier AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
S Predicate Material 510(k) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
S Predicate Material 510(k) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
lanley liao Who can share these material with me ? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
E Record Retention - Raw Material (Steel Certs) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3
M Documents to be included in 1.3 Material check in PPA report APQP and PPAP 4
rerusk1 MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
M Material incoming to the production process reflected in PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 9
R Do we need issue ECN (Engineering Change Notice) towards updated Material Specification? Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
Q Change the shape of the raw material FAI AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom