L
I'm sure this has been asked and info. provided previously in the forums....but I'm unable to locate. Can folks in the forum share how their companies handle their document review....specifically whether they perform an annual review or document a regular timeframe that procedures are required to be looked at to ensure accuracy, etc? During a recent customer audit, the auditor stated that their company performs an "annual" review of all their procedures. She stated we should do the same. (During her audit she did find a procedure that did not reflect what the work area was actually doing.) We are a custom manuf. org. of approx. 500 people with many thousands of work procedures. My head almost exploded when my Mgr agreed and decided he wanted to take it a step further and revise each document to reflect that they have been reviewed...even when there are no changes. In a perfect world this may be a good solution, but I manage the Doc Control system and with only one other person assisting me, all I can think about is the amt. of work involved in revising all these procedures in the system...when I have other value added activies I could be spending my time on. Any ideas?

