D
Dingo
Forms revision
Hi. I need some help on an issue I am having with the way our procedures are structured.
We currently reference forms in the body of our procedures and include them as exhibits (our entire system is built this way). My logic tells me that when we revise a form we therefore have to revise the procedure. By including the form as an exhibit don't we make it a part of the procedure... therefore requiring the entire procedure to be revised...?
If we don"t do this then we have a procedure with a 2001 revision with 2002 revision dated exhibits.
We are not ISO compliant but the Quality Manager is considering moving in that direction. Before our system gets much bigger than it already is I would like to get this little issue squared away.
Dingo...!
Hi. I need some help on an issue I am having with the way our procedures are structured.
We currently reference forms in the body of our procedures and include them as exhibits (our entire system is built this way). My logic tells me that when we revise a form we therefore have to revise the procedure. By including the form as an exhibit don't we make it a part of the procedure... therefore requiring the entire procedure to be revised...?
If we don"t do this then we have a procedure with a 2001 revision with 2002 revision dated exhibits.
We are not ISO compliant but the Quality Manager is considering moving in that direction. Before our system gets much bigger than it already is I would like to get this little issue squared away.
Dingo...!