Umang,
I did not ask the question inferring that we were trying to do anything unethical and I do not appreciate the suggestion that we are. I was simply trying to get help from others in this forum on how to explain this to some people who may not have the understanding of a Quality System that you do. I was under the impression that this site was to help others in the Quality field. I was not aware that it was a forum to get attacked for asking for help. I can assure you that the primary reason for my question was to make absolutely sure that we provide a fully conforming product to our customer without doing anything to compromise the quality of it. Please excuse my ignorance.
Hello Tamster,
Apparently you have misconstrued the whole thing. There is no intention on my part to attack or hurt you or anyone for that matter. Since your colleagues were adamant to see in writing, that rework parts can not be sent for PPAP approval, I thought it will be a lot easier to make them understand from a different angle.
I said, the only option to send the reworked components in the PPAP lot was, without a mention of the rework, for which I opined is against ethics. Tell me if I am wrong. Since this is the only way, I said
"..which perhaps your colleages want to do (I may be wrong)." Hope you understand the use of
PERHAPS here. Furthermore I have said
'I may be Wrong' in drawing the inference. So where is the so called 'attack'?!
The whole content of my discussion was hypothetical. How have you deduced that I am charging you or anyone of unethical practice, since I was only trying to
caution you to avoid such a course of action. Please do'nt try to make mountain of a mole hill.
You are most welcome to continue posting on this wonderful forum. Let there be no hard feelings.
Umang
