Slightly
That's a widespread (well-intentioned) misconception.
The standard (13485:2016) spells out a requirement for a "risk-based approach" in a rather narrow/specific context. Other than that it suggests/guides towards risk-based practice in a number of specific contexts.
I agree that in general it's a good habit to think in risk-based terms, but let's please not attribute to the standard what isn't in it.
The standard expects you to take a risk-based approach (in all things)
The standard (13485:2016) spells out a requirement for a "risk-based approach" in a rather narrow/specific context. Other than that it suggests/guides towards risk-based practice in a number of specific contexts.
I agree that in general it's a good habit to think in risk-based terms, but let's please not attribute to the standard what isn't in it.