Risk assessment & Product development - All products - Medical device or not?

D

Denis

#1
Hi, I need some advice can you help? I seem to be swimming against the tide here!

We have a product development team which bring new products to the market place. Some of these products are not medical devices, but they are used by customers who work to GMP and expect a high degree of conformance to all relevant standards and GMP.

I say, that we need to perform risk analysis for all products brought to the market place irrespective of whether it is a medical device or not.

I have read the standard, I believe that this is the intent of the document, others in the organisation believe I am just trying to slow down the process. I say it is a requirement (and good business practice), and I'm just trying to eliminate potential problems.

I would welcome a healthy discussion / debate - if I'm wrong - then that's ok, but why?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

Jon Griver

#2
Denis said:
I have read the standard, I believe that this is the intent of the document, others in the organisation believe I am just trying to slow down the process. I say it is a requirement (and good business practice), and I'm just trying to eliminate potential problems.
Denis,

Standards are not necessarily mandated regulatory requirements. While risk analysis is a regulatory requirement for medical equipment, I do not believe this to be the case for non-medical equipment.

Even when not legally required, performance of risk analysis is certainly good business practice and could be helpful as part of a defense in a product liability case.


Jon Griver
 
M

mitsu11

#3
Risk Analysis = FMEA

When I first shifted into the medical device industry, I was thrown a lot of terms that seemed really specific to medical devices. (Overwelmed at first. Now I know better.) Risk analysis is one of those terms. Well, when I finally sat down to do one of these fancy evaluations, I realized that it is identical to an FMEA, which I had a lot of experience with in previous positions.

Now, FMEA/risk analysis is not required by ISO-9001 or some other standards, but isn't it a good idea? You are taking your product, your system, your process, and evaluating how it will affect other people/things/whatever. Engineers only know so much, and they can't consider every possible impact of a new product during design. This offers an organized, "step back and look at the forest" kind of approach that can really improve a design even more.

I would really question the output of a process that doesn't try something like this, even if it is on an informal basis. Have a meeting with design, manufacturing, sales, and service. Ask "how can this hurt someone? or break? or be done better?". Write down the answers, and you got it. You don't need a form per se to successfully manage your risk.

... Unless you manufacture medical devices. Then you need a form.
 
Q

qualitygoddess - 2010

#4
Denis:

I agree that risk analysis is a great tool for product development. I have seen risk analysis for medical devices be quite labor-intensive, and wonder if you could support a less stringent approach for the non-medical products. You would still get the benefit of something like FMEA, but without some of the extras for a full risk analysis as described in 13485, and promulgated by the regulatory agencies?

--J
 

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
mitsu11 said:
Risk analysis is one of those terms. Well, when I finally sat down to do one of these fancy evaluations, I realized that it is identical to an FMEA, which I had a lot of experience with in previous positions.
Risk analysis goes beyond Failure Mode Effects Analysis. It takes into account the risks associated with normal use as well as the risks associated with failure of the product to perform properly.
 
M

mitsu11

#6
Al Rosen said:
Risk analysis goes beyond Failure Mode Effects Analysis. It takes into account the risks associated with normal use as well as the risks associated with failure of the product to perform properly.
The FMEA I learned did incorporate those things. It may have helped that I originally learned from an anal frenchman (that is a compliment to him, really).
 
D

Denis

#7
Thanks for the feedback, but here lies my main concern.

Risk analysis is a cornerstone element of 13485, and as such if we as a company comply to this standard we should be performing some form of Risk Analysis.

13485 even points you in the right direction to 14971 Risk analysis.

I don't see that you can jump in and out of the standard to suit you, you either conform to 13485 requirements (in full) or you don't. As I said previously, there is an expectation (unstated customer requirements) that our products will be used in clean rooms for contamination control purposes, plus some medical devices.

Any thoughts?
 
V

Vincnet

#8
Denis said:
Thanks for the feedback, but here lies my main concern.

Risk analysis is a cornerstone element of 13485, and as such if we as a company comply to this standard we should be performing some form of Risk Analysis.

13485 even points you in the right direction to 14971 Risk analysis.

I don't see that you can jump in and out of the standard to suit you, you either conform to 13485 requirements (in full) or you don't. As I said previously, there is an expectation (unstated customer requirements) that our products will be used in clean rooms for contamination control purposes, plus some medical devices.

Any thoughts?
My interpretation here is that 13485 is a standard for regulatory compliance which means that it sets rules to comply with regulations. Within your organisation you might have products requiring full compliance with regulation and products that are not regulated. So as I see it nothing forbids you to define somewhere in you QMS that for non regulated products the rules are slitghtly different part of this difference beeing the absence of Risk Analysis.

Having said that, iIagree with you on the fact that Risk Anal should be sound business practice, but I heard exactly the same comments in my company : "I am trying to slow down the process".
If you can find a good convincing real story where it shows that risk analysis could have help avoiding a real (economic) disaster for the concerned company. I am fairly sure that everyone will then listen to you :)))

Vincent
 
D

Denis

#9
Yes, I dare say I am trying to conform to the requirements with a Quality professionals view point. But, this is only for the sake of good business practice.

I will compromise my view in the light of the arguments put forward - if only to move the business along (for the present).

But I do know that at some point in the future this lack of risk assessment will come back and bite us.

The point I have been trying to raise in our organisation is that I am voicing genuine concern for best business practice.

Hey ho.
 
J

Jim Howe

#10
Denis said:
Thanks for the feedback, but here lies my main concern.

Risk analysis is a cornerstone element of 13485, and as such if we as a company comply to this standard we should be performing some form of Risk Analysis.

13485 even points you in the right direction to 14971 Risk analysis.

I don't see that you can jump in and out of the standard to suit you, you either conform to 13485 requirements (in full) or you don't. As I said previously, there is an expectation (unstated customer requirements) that our products will be used in clean rooms for contamination control purposes, plus some medical devices.

Any thoughts?
Consider a business that uses several standards based on the requirements of each of its customers. For example; government vs. commercial (at one time they were two different solder standards).

In my experience we would wave solder government PC boards using rosin flux with vapor degrease clean but the commercial PC Boards were acid flux with water clean. So yes a company can and does jump in and out of standards depending on customer.

That having been said, I am currently employed by a company that has absolutely nothing to do with the medical field and we perform the following, as a minimum, on all new product development:

4.1.3 Risk assessment is based on:

1) Product safety analysis
2) Manufacturability analysis
3) Business risk analysis

I cannot imagine that any company would pursue a new product and not perform at least a safety analysis! I agree with you that it may come back to bite, but not because of some standard requirement, rather common sense.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Risk Assessment Checklist for Non product Software IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
Don Fardie CAPA vs. Risk Assessment - Changing a product material for better performance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S Product Risk Assessment and Management Procedure per API Q1 9th Edition Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 8
V Examples of Risk Assessment (FMEA) through the Life Cycle of the Product Development ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 16
Chennaiite Product Release Risk Assessment - Ideas Wanted Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
J Risk Assessment of Raw Materials? Medical Device product ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
Q FMEA and Risk assessment in MS ACCESS FMEA and Control Plans 2
thisby_ Post Market/Production Risk Assessment ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 0
N ISO 27001 for Jumb Burger - Risk Assessment sheet IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 11
C Risk Assessment Tools ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
_robinsingh Security Risk Assessment Tool IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
R Risk assessment on IT containers and the information they contain IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
B Threat/Vulnerability Catalogue for risk assessment IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
R FOD Risk Assessment - What tools would you recommend for assessing FOD risk? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
M Informational Final guidance – GUIDELINES on the benefit-risk assessment of the presence of phthalates in certain medical devices covering phthalates which are carc Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
D Risk Assessment Procedure in accordance with ISO 17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
M Informational EU – 12th Meeting of the Working Group on Guidelines on benefit – risk assessment of Phthalates in Medical Devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
D Doing both a top-down and a bottom-up risk assessment - How to combine ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 13
V Sequence of performing risk assessment: User_FMEA (User Errors) vs Design Inputs FMEA and Control Plans 1
chris1price Cleanroom Monitoring Plan - ISO14644-2:2015 - Risk Assessment Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
T IEC 60601-1 - Risk assessment to determine the liquid - 11.6.3 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
P Looking for Risk Assessment Template - Not necessarily Asset based IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 1
S Can anybody share a sample risk assessment prepared based on ISO 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 15
M Informational EU – SCHEER – Minutes of the Working Group meeting on guidelines on the benefit-risk assessment of the presence of phthalates in certain medical devic Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
Q Risk & opportunity assessment - ISO 14001 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
J Simple supplier evaluation qualification process form that includes Risk Assessment Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K Risk Assessment Registry - ISO 27001 IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 9
M Risk Identification and Risk Assessment for any Process - Is it necessary? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
D Qualitative vs. Quantitative Risk Assessment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
B Process Risk Assessment Example for a Manufacturing Company Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
A Risk Assessment Technique that fits the Context of the Organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Q Risk Impact - Risk Assessment Sample/Method per ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
somashekar How to put in place a Risk Assessment of Vulnerabilities & Corruption... Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 2
A Preventive Action and Risk Assessment Audit Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 5
A Risk Assessment- What to do? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
somashekar FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessory Risk Assessment Other US Medical Device Regulations 15
V Risk Assessment Precedence - FMEA > Risk Matrix (Modified PHA) > Ishikawa? FMEA and Control Plans 11
M Risk Assessment & Contingency Planning (API Q1, 9th. Ed.) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 9
P Example Risk Assessment for CAPA's Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
J Timeframes for Risk-Based Biocompatibiilty Assessment Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
S RoHS Conformity Risk Assessment - Medical Devices RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 2
J API Q1-9 Critical Supppliers 5.6.1.2 and Risk Assessment Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
A Risk Assessment Considerations for various Activities Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
S Can anyone share template for Device Risk Assessment ? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
S Definition Technical Risk Assessment - Definition Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 3
Wes Bucey The Ethics of Risk Assessment Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 13
AnaMariaVR2 Structured Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment in Drug Regulatory Decision-Making Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
M How to document Risk Assessment on Repeat Business AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
P What are FMEA Risk assessment techniques? FMEA and Control Plans 4
V Which Risk Assessment tool is adequate? FMEA and Control Plans 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom