SBS - The best value in QMS software

Risk Rating approaches (OHSAS 18001 - For Office Environments)

Risk prioritization by:

  • a matrix approach, requiring scoring and grading of risk

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • A line in the manual that acknowledges prioritization is considered in mitigating actions

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3
P

Peter West

#1
Dear Cove

I searched through the threads and sure this has been covered in some form but couldn't find it.

We are developing our H&S management system to OHS&S 18001 for international launch, and following a gap analysis of the system i noted that we do not prioritize identified risk - we simply outline the control and the timeline for the corrective action.

We have 2 options -

The matrix approach scoring risk based on likelihood and severity then grading it low, medium and high (with associated guidelines for control actions and timelines).

A line in the procedure, and within training that states 'mitigating actions borne of risk assessments consider the risk (its severity and its likelihood) and provide for it accordingly, primarily through the deadline for corrective action'.


Each have their pros and cons but as we are a simple office set up with standard hazards across the world (no extraordinary hazards identified) I think the second option is the most effective.


Please can you consider and let me know what you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
K

kgott

#2
Re: Risk Rating approaches (OHS&S 18001 -For Office Environments)

Dear Cove

The matrix approach scoring risk based on likelihood and severity then grading it low, medium and high (with associated guidelines for control actions and timelines).

Please can you consider and let me know what you think?
In my opinion, the matrix approach has the advantage of being more likely to result in a more uniform interpretation and application across your organization/s. This in turn is more likely to reduce variation in the assessment of risk and in the application of suitable controls.

You can build into your procedure; a requirement, that any corrective/preventative actions (controls) are to be verified to be effective using some kind of metric such as number of unwanted events associated with the selected control vs the number of times the chosen control is applied, over a 12 month period for example.

Where the control is found to be in-effective, other potential controls can be evaluated and applied until one is found to be effective using the metric you select.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Dear Cove

I searched through the threads and sure this has been covered in some form but couldn't find it.

We are developing our H&S management system to OHS&S 18001 for international launch, and following a gap analysis of the system i noted that we do not prioritize identified risk - we simply outline the control and the timeline for the corrective action.

We have 2 options -

The matrix approach scoring risk based on likelihood and severity then grading it low, medium and high (with associated guidelines for control actions and timelines).

A line in the procedure, and within training that states 'mitigating actions borne of risk assessments consider the risk (its severity and its likelihood) and provide for it accordingly, primarily through the deadline for corrective action'.


Each have their pros and cons but as we are a simple office set up with standard hazards across the world (no extraordinary hazards identified) I think the second option is the most effective.


Please can you consider and let me know what you think?
OHSAS 18002:2008 (guidelines for implementing OHSAS 18001:2007) gives you comparisons of some examples of risk assessment tools and methodologies in the informative Annex D.
It compares 7 tools that can be used.
 
M

mparus1

#4
Does anyone have a FMEA like ( RPN rating based) tool such as an excel spreadsheet they can share for Risk and Hazard ratings and reduction activities they can share?
 
K

kgott

#5
Dear Cove


We are developing our H&S management system to OHS&S 18001 for international launch, and following a gap analysis of the system i noted that we do not prioritize identified risk - we simply outline the control and the timeline for the corrective action.

We have 2 options -

The matrix approach scoring risk based on likelihood and severity then grading it low, medium and high (with associated guidelines for control actions and timelines).

and provide for it accordingly, primarily through the deadline for corrective action'.
?
Does your risk assessment matrix have a guidleines or rules for each of scores in the risk assessment? Such a set of guideliens or rules advise what actions to take for each 'score' your risk matrix gives. Your risk matrix is your guiding document. If you act in accordance with the risk matrix you can prove probity and due diligence.

See the section Management Controls and Response in the attachment.

"'mitigating actions borne of risk assessments consider the risk (its severity and its likelihood)."

I dont have a problem with this but, in my opinion, its written in a complicated way but its really not necessary to have this sentence.
 

Attachments

K

kgott

#7
Dear Cove

I searched through the threads and sure this has been covered in some form but couldn't find it.

We are developing our H&S management system to OHS&S 18001 for international launch, and following a gap analysis of the system i noted that we do not prioritize identified risk - we simply outline the control and the timeline for the corrective action.

We have 2 options -

The matrix approach scoring risk based on likelihood and severity then grading it low, medium and high (with associated guidelines for control actions and timelines).
If you use this approach, you have a defined and consistent method for assessing risk and likelihood. Your risk matrix determinations of risk will then indicate the sorts of actions to take. Actions taken are comensurate with the risk, eg high risk issues are to be dealt with more urgently than low risk issues.

Using the risk matrix approach will achieve a more consistent approach to determining solutions and setting priority for managing issues.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Third Party Service Provider Risk Rating Spreadsheet Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 1
S OHS Risk Analysis - What does the 'Risk Rating' refer to? Total or Residual? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 5
F Method for aggregating individual RPNs and determining an overall risk rating? FMEA and Control Plans 3
B AS9102 - 3D printing a special tool required for assembly (counterfeit risk?) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
K Defining risk control measures IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 13
U Supply risk management Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
T Biological Evaluation (10993) & Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 9
D Cybersecurity and Risk Management: Loss of confidentiality IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 4
Q FMEA and Risk assessment in Microsoft Access FMEA and Control Plans 6
I Realization processes input into overall risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
M Need Help With Information Security Asset Risk Register IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 2
thisby_ Post Market/Production Risk Assessment ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 0
S Risk Management Review ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
D Low risk IVD study in the UK, do I need MHRA approval? UK Medical Device Regulations 1
S Risk Management and other Files ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 8
silentmonkey Overall Benefit/Risk Analysis - Risk Management VS Clinical Evaluation ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
N ISO 27001 for Jumb Burger - Risk Assessment sheet IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 11
C Risk Assessment Tools ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
qualprod Examples to mitigate risk from Covid ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
G Risk of stopping your customer's line IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C Risk Matrix vs FMEAs ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 11
S IVD risk class II devices for Brazil and MDSAP Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
M ISO 14971:2019: Criteria for overall residual risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 11
M ISO14971:2019 - Verification of implementation and effectiveness of risk control ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
Aymaneh Medical Device Cybersecurity Risk Management IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 2
S Traceability of requirements to design and risk Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
R Risk control measures as per ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 6
D Deciding whether or not pre-market clinical investigation is required for low risk device EU Medical Device Regulations 5
R The term "Benefit Risk Ratio" in EU MDR, do I need to present benefit risk analysis as a RATIO Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 4
_robinsingh Security Risk Assessment Tool IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
A 21 CFR 820 - Risk Management - Looking for some guidance US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
bryan willemot Contract Review and risk managment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
Sravan Manchikanti Software Risk Management & probability of occurrence as per IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 8
E Normal Condition Hazards in Risk Analysis ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
silentmonkey Rationalising the level of effort and depth of software validation based on risk ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
R Risk assessment on IT containers and the information they contain IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
B Threat/Vulnerability Catalogue for risk assessment IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
R Opportunity For Improvement vs Opportunity (Positive Risk) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
R FOD Risk Assessment - What tools would you recommend for assessing FOD risk? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
R Identify Medical Device characterstics as Annex C of ISO 14971 Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
A ISO 14971 PFMEA Manufacturing Risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
Q Example of the Risk Template Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
K Overall residual risk according to ISO 14971:2019 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
A Risk Number for each software requirement IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 7
A IEC 60601 11.2.2.1 Risk of Fire in an Oxygen Rich Environment, Source of Ignition IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
D Importing a general wellness low risk product Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
C Quantifying risk in choosing the number of parts, operators and replicates in a GR&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
R AQL, Consumer Risk and MA Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
M Risk managment report of Surgical Mask Example ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 14

Similar threads

Top Bottom