Same Medical Device, Different Classifications By Different NB?

R

rcjpedro

Hi All!

What say you when the same Medical Device gets classified as IIb by a NB and as IIa by a different NB? I have the certificates, one my own and competition downloaded from the world wide web.

And to whom should this issue be reported?

Thanks in advance!
 
M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
I don't know how this is possible.

I didn't think that it was allowed to have more than one NB for a given device...

In anycase, is it not possible to ask for the classification rationale? i.e. by what MDD rule is the device classified?
 
R

rcjpedro

Hi Mark

Sorry for any confusion.

One device is manufactured by my company and certified by one Notified Body, class IIa

The other device is placed on the market by another manufacturer(competition), certified by a diferent Notified Body, class IIb.

Thank you for your interest
 
M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
In my experience, it's up to you to present the classification and rationale (MDD rule) for your device, and NBs will review and either agree or not.

...so if your NB agrees with your rationale for Class IIa, then great!

The fact that a competing (equivalent) device has a different classification through a different NB probably just means that the other manufacturer or NB has adopted a different interpretation of the rules with respect to their device.

Because (I presume) you and your competitor's devices are not completely identical, this may be a result of, for example, different materials, differently worded intended use/indications, or perhaps simply a more conservative definition of "potentially hazardous" when assessing the MDD rules.
 
R

rcjpedro

Hi Mark

Upon first submission of TF for approval we had a CAPA request based on a NB Consensus Statement regarding this type of equipment

In Consensus Statement it was clear that they are IIa

Off topic a bit but how can Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) work if this kind of situation is not addressed?

Thanks in advance
 
M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
rcjpedro said:
Off topic a bit but how can Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) work if this kind of situation is not addressed?
Click to expand...

I don't know. This is a shortcoming of such systems.

I'm not a big fan of attempts for descriptive categories like GMDN, or the FDA's product codes. They are just too rigid, and fail to account for all the possible variations in the way a device can be designed, constructed, and operated.

I think a risk-based rule system (like in MDD 93/42/EEC Annex IX) is preferable, as it allows devices to be assessed case-by-case.
 
P

pkost

Trusted Information Resource
the above points are correct - the manufacturer evaluates the rules and decides a classification which they must justify. The NB then reviews this classification, if they agree then all is good.

The decisions of the NBs should be aligned however they aren't always. If you do not agree with your NB's decision, then you can request clarification from the competent authority. If you still disagree then the European court has final say in the matter (I've missed some steps).

Likely causes of a difference:

1. There is an additional claim in one product that changes the classification, it could be subtle and easy to miss. (If the two NBs you refer to are in the same country I would say this is the more likely option)

2. There are some products that competent authorities classify differently​
 
chris1price

chris1price

Trusted Information Resource
If the two devices are correctly classified, that it is likely that the intended use of the devices is different. This could be the location in the body the device is used, whether it is is intended to be connected to an active device, etc.

I dont think there is currently a connection between the GMDN code and the classification unde rthe MDD, although this may chnage in the future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A 510(k) and DeNovo on same medical device for different indications? US Medical Device Regulations 5
V Sister companies selling same medical device under different names ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S CE Marking requirements - A Medical device with different config sold under same name EU Medical Device Regulations 0
F CE and FDA Mark on same IVD/Medical Device Label EU Medical Device Regulations 12
P Russian Medical Device Regulations for Multiple Brands of the same Product Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 4
D Keeping Same Medical Device Name but Changing Classification Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 3
R Pharma vs. Medical Device Regulations on the same Product CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
R Candian Medical Device - Same product, different name Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
K Is minimum repair or replace guarantee period for medical devices in EU the same as consumer guarantee law of 2 years? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M Is EN ISO 10079-1 same as YY 0636.1? (Medical Suction Equipment) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
N Two Leaflets with the same Medical Product - One for Provider and one for Patient ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M Egypt: Does egypt allows Multiple Registrations of the Same Product? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
T New process capability analysis required when changing a product on the same line? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Franky Zhang123 The Electrical Standards GB9706.1:2020 (same as IEC 60601-1:2012) etc. will be implemented on May 1st, 2023 in China. China Medical Device Regulations 0
R Selling same device as IVD and RUO US Medical Device Regulations 8
R Selling same device as IVD and RUO EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Production for same product at two production sites AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
H EMC & Safety Testing of the product with the same Sr. No. for EC Declaration CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
E Importer - same legal entity EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Multiple amendments at same license Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
M Review of work - independent review? or can it be the same person ? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
P Can credentials (ID/PW) used to login be the same as when applying Electronic Signature (Part 11) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
J Not able to repeat measurement at the same location General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
V Product naming: Same name - different perfume & status CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
Z Why Control Limits are not the same depending on type of exclusion of data points Using Minitab Software 7
K UDI for two units with different S/N on the same package/case Other US Medical Device Regulations 10
T CE Marking - Bench mark Device from same manufacturer CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
P Arena simulation, How can my Arena model have exactly the same output each time I run it? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 0
M Are you allowed to reuse the same asset number if the device was replaced? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
Scanton Double Major for the same infraction? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
G Same parts but new customer - What will the auditor ask me? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
K 510K new manufacturer but same components Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
A Several sections of traditional 510(K) have the same or similar requirement of content. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
J Sub-supplier change from manual to automated process - same specs - Report to FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
Q Must product name be listed the same name in FURLS, UDI, GUDID and Company Website? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
G Same intended use devices - Technical file EU Medical Device Regulations 5
K More than one importer for the same device EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Q Legal Manufacturing Address Change – multiple registrations at same address 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
K Validation of new machine (second machine of the same type) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 2
M MSDS process audit - Can any one give idea for checklist of the same Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 14
L PMA and Non-PMA parts in same finished goods area? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
D CE Marking Requirements MDD & MDR - new product development covered under same scope EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C Failure nets - Same level effects FMEA and Control Plans 0
C Subsidiaries; same/different Quality Policies? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
qualprod Add new action plans in CA, while waiting effectiveness - Same problem reappears ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
C Can a manufacturer (in South Korea) have multiple Brazil Registration Holder (BRH) for same brand names? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
S Multiple Authorized Reps in the EU for the same device? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Z Two Payment Identification Number (PIN) for the same order in DFUF website 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
L Help me to decide which test to use - If each proportion belongs to the same population Using Minitab Software 7

Similar threads

Top Bottom