Sanctioned Interpretations - IATF 16949 Cl. 8.3.3.3 Special characteristics

Peters

Quite Involved in Discussions
Sanctioned Interpretation to IATF 16949 oct 2017
Number of Interpretation: 6
Clause: 8.3.3.3 Special characteristics

The organization shall use a multidisciplinary approach to establish, document, and implement its process(es) to identify special characteristics, including those determined by the customer and the risk analysis performed by the organization, and shall include the following:
a) documentation of all special characteristics in the product and/or manufacturing documents drawings (as required), relevant risk analysis (such as Process FMEA), control plans, and standard work/operator instructions; special characteristics are identified with specific markings and are cascaded through each of these documents; documented in the manufacturing documents which show the creation of, or the controls required, for these special characteristics;

(red - deleted text, blue - new text)

First question: What is the interpretation of word "creation of"?
Creation - decision that (for example) dimensional characteristic is special characteristic
or
Creation - achievement/processing of the dimensional characteristic in machining process
?

Second question - only Process FMEA? Does it mean that special characteristics in DFMEA are not required?
 

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
Are you really asking for unsanctioned interpretation of sanctioned interpretation? :D :D :D

[...]documented in the manufacturing documents which show the creation of [...] special characteristics.
When manufacturing step runs according to process characteristic selected as special one, it has to be documented in manufacturing documents, e.g. work instruction, for this step.
When result of implementation of process step is product characteristic selected as special one, it has to be documented in manufacturing documents, e.g. work instruction, for this step.

DFMEA was not specially mentioned here, but it is still there in [... process(es) to identify special characteristics ...] and [... risk analysis ...].
 

Peters

Quite Involved in Discussions
Are you really asking for unsanctioned interpretation of sanctioned interpretation? :D :D :D.

Why not? Maybe people with a better understanding of English can better interpret this text. From my colleagues (also from automotive) I have conflicting opinions.
I ask about this text because auditor can't require anything that is not included in the requirements.
 
Q

QualityBCI

We received a non conformance in our IATF-16949 audit for 8.3.3.3


[FONT=&quot]The organization shall use a multidisciplinary approach to establish, document, and implement its process(es) to identify special characteristics, including those determined by the customer and the risk analysis performed by the organization.

The planning process is not completely effective.

No evidence that the organization has established a process for identifying special characteristics unless driven by the customer. No methods for internal designation established.

The issue was classified as a minor because the organization does have methods for managing customer identified special characteristics, just not internal.[/FONT]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
W Minor NC - IATF Rules 5th Edition Sanctioned Interpretations against 4.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
M New IATF Sanctioned Interpretations April 2021 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
octavio tarango Release of Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) related to Rules 5th Edition and Sanctioned Interpretations related to IATF 16949:2016 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
L IATF 16949 Contingency plan requirements / Sanctioned Interpretations? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 43
Ron Rompen ISO 9001 Sanctioned Interpretations and FAQs ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J Rules 3rd Edition Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) Posted 07/16/2010 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Automotive Process Approach Auditing sanctioned interpretations S1 04 04 General Auditing Discussions 1
Sidney Vianna ISO 14001 Interpretations - sanctioned in the USA ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
S November 2003 QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations - The Use of OEMs for Calibration QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
Q IASG Sanctioned Interpretations for QS 9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
S IAOB Sanctioned Interpretations - Duplications/contradictions - TS update/interps? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
J TS 16949 Sanctioned Interpretations yet? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S ISO TS 16949:2002 - Sanctioned interpretations on the new requirements yet? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
Q Previous Sanctioned Interpretations QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
L Sanctioned Interpretations - GM Definition for 'Level II Controlled Shipping' QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
G Interpreting the Sanctioned Interpretations General Auditing Discussions 1
K New QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations - 1 July 2001 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 139
V IASG sanctioned interpretations QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
G QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
Ashland78 9.3.2.1 Sanctioned Interpretation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
W 7.1.5.3.2. External laboratory Sanctioned Interpretation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
B Sanctioned interpretation #10 - ISO 17025 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q Contingency plan - IATF Sanctioned Interpretation 17 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
A IATF Sanctioned Interpretation No. 7 - Type and Extent of Control (supplemental) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Marc AS/EN/JISQ 9100:2016 IAQG Sanctioned Aerospace Auditor Training Available (Nov 2016) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
T TS 16949 Clause 7.4.1.2 and Sanctioned Interpretation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
D IAQG Sanctioned Aerospace Auditor Transition Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
Sidney Vianna IAQG Sanctioned Resolutions for the Aerospace QMS Certification Scheme AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
howste New IATF Sanctioned Interpretation: Automotive Process Approach Auditing ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 14
C Sanctioned Interpretation - Merger / Joint Venture Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 19
A Distributors - QS-9000 3rd edition and sanctioned interpretation C-9 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
J QS Sanctioned Intrepretations of May 29, 2001 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 28
L Sanctioned format for the Chrysler 7 Step Corrective Action Process Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
D AIAG approved for sanctioned training delivery QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001 News ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Listing of Approved Interpretations against ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
T Quality Management System Q1 and Q2 Interpretations [Deleted] Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 1
Cats Clause Application of ISO 9001:2015 Clause Interpretations for Service Industries Service Industry Specific Topics 2
A AS9100C. 7.1.2 Risk Management - Interpretations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
M Differing interpretations in ISO 17025 and 21CFR820.72(b)(2) ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
J Key Characteristics Annotations on Drawings - AS9103 Multiple Interpretations Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
T AS9100C Interpretations Document AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
D Design Input/Output and Design V&V (Verification and Validation) Interpretations 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 14
O Clause Interpretations related to AS9100 Implementation AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
M Specific Requirement for Calibration - ISO 17025 Clause 5.6.2 Interpretations ISO 17025 related Discussions 15
R ISO 9001:2008 Clause Interpretations and Clarifications ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 36
P AIAG SPC Manual (ver.1) Interpretations related to Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
M Written process that is ineffective as evidenced by multiple interpretations ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 36
S TS 16949 Interpretations: 8.2.2.4 Internal Audit Plans Internal Auditing 9
Marc ISO 9001:2000 - TC176 Interpretations Database ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001:2000 Interpretations: RFI's #16 and 17 - Clause 8.3 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22

Similar threads

Top Bottom