Hi 323man,
We are also a manufacturing and at the same time a testing facility. Our Manufacturing which deals with the automotive parts bears the TS16949 Certificate. Our Testing Facility was assessed in meeting the requirements of TS16949 but we are only given a Letter of Conformance.
Raffy

We are also a manufacturing and at the same time a testing facility. Our Manufacturing which deals with the automotive parts bears the TS16949 Certificate. Our Testing Facility was assessed in meeting the requirements of TS16949 but we are only given a Letter of Conformance.
Raffy
Hi Howard,
Thanks for your reply,
Regarding the way things are manufactured, it took me a while to get used to also, but I think it is normal in the electronic component industry. The question is only how far back down the chain you own. Actually I think that my company perform more testing and have a smaller (and closer managed) supply base than any of our competitors.
Yes we audit our suppliers and any returns are investigated by QA and Engineering in our company with corrective actions and implementations to prevent reoccurrence being a combination of the manufacturing sites and our sites implementations, any actions given by our manufacturing site are followed up at the next audit.
Historically our company was a manufacturing company which started to outsource some of the work, until at some point all the work became out sourced.
I hope you can appreciate that for the purposes of this discussion I am being very honest about the situation.
On the one hand we could simply box shift for our automotive customers and tell them where we are buying from, but on the other hand actually this would mean having a lower level of supplier control than we have for standard product.
When you say:-
The testing that you do should be according to the complete requirements of TS.
Does this mean that as a test house we would need to obtain TS16949 certificate?
Thanks for your reply,
Regarding the way things are manufactured, it took me a while to get used to also, but I think it is normal in the electronic component industry. The question is only how far back down the chain you own. Actually I think that my company perform more testing and have a smaller (and closer managed) supply base than any of our competitors.
Yes we audit our suppliers and any returns are investigated by QA and Engineering in our company with corrective actions and implementations to prevent reoccurrence being a combination of the manufacturing sites and our sites implementations, any actions given by our manufacturing site are followed up at the next audit.
Historically our company was a manufacturing company which started to outsource some of the work, until at some point all the work became out sourced.
I hope you can appreciate that for the purposes of this discussion I am being very honest about the situation.
On the one hand we could simply box shift for our automotive customers and tell them where we are buying from, but on the other hand actually this would mean having a lower level of supplier control than we have for standard product.
When you say:-
The testing that you do should be according to the complete requirements of TS.
Does this mean that as a test house we would need to obtain TS16949 certificate?