Separating work instructions from SOPs

S

Stickney

#1
Some facilities work instructions separate from their SOPs, but I do not understand the
rationale for having instructions constitute
a separate document. Either way, the procedure itself and therefore the document
are bound to change, so what difference does it make whether you have to change "only"
the work instructions? If the immutability of SOPs is the reason for having them separate, I do not see its value. Can somebody explain it to me?
[email protected]
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

Al Dyer

#2
I like to consider it this way:

Our procedures (level II) make reference to the work instructions (level III).

When a level III document changes it does not mean that we have to re-circulate and approve the level II procedure to note that the level III has changed.

Level III documents are the most important documents in the system as they convey to the work force the method to perform job duties.

It comes down to how you define your document structure, and how it relates to to the personnel using the documents.

IMHO (if this is rs from jt watch out!)

ASD...

[This message has been edited by Al Dyer (edited 06 February 2001).]
 
P

paula

#3
My opinion regarding this matter is that for some companies, the work instructions, for some of the activities, may constitute a secret of fabrication or anyway, a document you wouldn't want to be seen by other people, except your employees. And furthermore, sometimes the procedure for a process cand be expressed in a simple manner, but involving a lot of references to various WI.

But in the end .. as Al said .. is your choice to have them together as well as you can have the procedures included in the quality manual.

------------------
Have a quality day! :)
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#4
I agree with Al, why revise a level two document when the change does not affect the overall process.

We use this guideline for deciding the appropriate level:
If the document involves several (areas, departments, machines, fill in the blank as appropriate) and the instructions are not exceptionally complicated, we make it level 2.
If the document is just for one task or one production line or a small group of people from one department and it is more complex we call it a level 3.
We have taken submissions that personnel submitted as level 2 and broken them down into several level 3's. We have also gone the other way with simple yet important items and moved them up a level.
Our final criteria for assigning levels is how much training is involved? If it is something that you can bring in someone off the street and train them in a reasonable amount of time internally, you probably don't need a detailed work instruction for it.

And like Paula, if it is the little things that set you apart from all of your competition and is complex enough, it should probably be in the work instructions.

We pretty much let our customers see any of the level two documents that they request, but when they start asking for work instructions we do what we can to discourage them. We figure that our Registrar was hired with a confidentiality agreement, but you cannot always trust your customer to that same agreement. If they think they have an ax to grind, they may just tell your competition how to better their supplier rating in order to bring in Cousin Roy.
 
D

David Mullins

#5
Procedure v WI.

Firstly, what's in a name.

B. This all depends on whether you would actually like your new value-adding employee to succeed as close to the first try as possible, and

Four. Talk to YOUR people to determine the benefits of the diferent approaches, then get key stakeholder agreement on the way to go.

VII. The new standard raises the bar on customer feedback as a tool to ensuring your are meeting customer requirements and expectations (stated and implied), so please give us some feedback Stickney!

PPS - Sorry about the numbering, I couldn't help myself.

------------------
 
S

stickney

#6
>"Why revise a level two document when the >change does not affect the overall process."
Why have two documents, when the information
could be incorporated in a single one?
Now that you mention it, I have heard of
organizations that do not require approval
of their work instructions, which seems
short-sighted. Any document important
enough to be controlled is important enough
to be approved, and if you are going to
have WIs, they would be in this catagory.

>Our final criteria for assigning levels is >how much training is involved? If it is >something that you can bring in someone off >the street and train them in a reasonable >mount of time internally, you probably >don't need a detailed work instruction for >it.
We figure that personnel using these
SOPs are going to have been qualified
for their position and trained on the
procedure, and (in addition to satisfying
quality requirements) the documents
reinforce the training and are a
reference during the period after training
when performance of the tasks may not
yet be rote. (The documents also help
to orient new personnel to their tasks.) Furthermore, the SOPs are usually written
by (or after consultation with) the
person performing the procedure.

>And like Paula, if it is the little things >that set you apart from all of your >competition ..., it should probably be in >the work instructions.
Protection of proprietary information
seems to be a valid reason for
separate documents, but our industry
standards and regulations are uniform,
so any "little" differences are frowned
upon, at least for the basic, product-
generation procedures. Therefore, for
us, this reason is irrelevant.

Stickney
[email protected]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
I Co-Development Process - Separating our development activities from our customer's ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
P Separating "Shall" requirements from "Should" detail ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
D Separating Customers not requiring AS9100 - Sheet metal and machine job shop AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
Domoreto Separating Tangled Parts with a "V" Shaped Metal Clip Manufacturing and Related Processes 17
A Interesting audit request - Full reaudit when separating R&D from division General Auditing Discussions 6
Raffy PREVENTIVE ACTION - Separating Corrective & Preventive Action. What am I gonna do? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 2
U Intended Users in IFU (Instructions for Use) EU Medical Device Regulations 5
was named killer AS 9100D - Calibration Instructions - Controlled documents? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
K EU MDR Annex 1 Chapter III: Information in the Instructions for Use-23.4 (e) the performance characteristics of the device; EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J Documentation structure - Do I need Work Instructions? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 23
C Work Instructions; Controlled/Uncontrolled? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
M User manual / instructions for use for class II device always required? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
L MDR - Information in the instructions for use - clausole 23.4.(z) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S ISO 18223-2 Temperature symbol in the Legend table in the Instructions for Use Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
S Providing IFU (Instructions for Use) in multiple languages EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Informational The USFDA Continues to Remind Facilities of the Importance of Following Duodenoscope Reprocessing Instructions: FDA Safety Communication Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Z IFU (Instructions for Use) Symbol - 7010:M002 - can it be in black? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
I Document levels and approval requirements for lower level documents like work instructions, forms etc. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 18
N Electronic Instructions for use (eIFU) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Marc Elsmar Xenforo Software Instructions #2 - 9/2018 Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 0
Marc Elsmar Xenforo Software Instructions #1 - 9/2018 Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 0
M Batch record supersedes all other instructions 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
N Updating class I device IFU with instructions to use class II cleared device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
H SPC Work Instructions (WI) Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
S Are 2 Hard Copies of Procedures and Instructions Required? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K IATF 16949 Cl. 8.5.1.2 - Requirements of Work Instructions and Documents IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
J Work Instructions - We have approx 1,000 work instructions from over the years Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
Ajit Basrur Incoming Inspection for Instructions for Use (IFU) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
T Product Instructions (IFU) - Placement Requirements - ISO 13485:2003/2016 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
C Manufacturing Process Work Instructions - Format Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
D 207/2012 Update for MDR (?) - Instructions for Use (IFU) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
R How to Control Videos as part of the QMS Documented Procedures and Instructions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
D eQMS/ERP System Admin Work Instructions - Where do they fit? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
R ISO 50001 - Manual and instructions Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 8
C Following Order of Work Instructions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 23
M CAPA due to Consumer not following Maintenance Instructions... Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
V Suggest Packing Instructions for Electrical Control panel Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q Allowed no manuals, technical instructions traceability in products ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
C Video Screencasts for Work Instructions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A Process Changes, but Work Instructions/Process Maps are not updated ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
O Regulatory Notification for IVD IFU Instructions Revision ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Q Help sections in Software Programs as Work Instructions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
R Should we have Work Instructions for HR or not Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
M Who should write Departmental Work Instructions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
S Informational Please help this newbie understand ISO 9001 Work Instructions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 44
T Work Instructions for Assembly vs. Disassembly Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 11
S Do Work Instructions have to be in harmony with the related Control Plan? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
Q ISO 9001 Requirement(s) for the Review of Work Instructions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11
M AS9100C Document Control for Machine Set Up Work Instructions AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
J IFUs (Instructions For Use) - EU e-Labeling 207/2012 EU Medical Device Regulations 15

Similar threads

Top Bottom