I find there several sections in traditional 510(K) have the same or similar requirement of content between 510(k) summary, Executive summary/Predicate comparison, device description, and substantial equivalence discussion. Do they have a different focus? Why do we need to repeat contain these contents ? Such as a detailed comparison is needed in both 510(k) summary, Executive summary/Predicate comparison and substantial equivalence discussion. why is device description as a separate section through the description of the device has appealed in other sections ?