P
Ok, obviously something as been taken the wrong way.
Never did I mention that the RPN# is the bible and that there should be a hard and fast point at which something should or should not be evaluated. Yes it is relative, yes there are other parameters to review before making a decision (as there always should be). What I did mention is that both the RPN and the individual numbers (S/O/D) should be reviewed. If the RPN is higher than acceptable look at the individuals to see where the culprit is. If the RPN is low, review the individuals as well just in case there is one errantly high number. The question is...what number is acceptable in terms of both RPN and individual? That is something that should be decided from the get go.
Never did I mention that the RPN# is the bible and that there should be a hard and fast point at which something should or should not be evaluated. Yes it is relative, yes there are other parameters to review before making a decision (as there always should be). What I did mention is that both the RPN and the individual numbers (S/O/D) should be reviewed. If the RPN is higher than acceptable look at the individuals to see where the culprit is. If the RPN is low, review the individuals as well just in case there is one errantly high number. The question is...what number is acceptable in terms of both RPN and individual? That is something that should be decided from the get go.
...