Should a low cost hand held refractometer be in a calibration program?

M

mecramur

#1
Should a low cost hand held refractometer be in a calibration program or simply zeroed at each use?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
Should a low cost hand held refractometer be in a calibration program or simply zeroed at each use?
There's a third possibility; it should be in the calibration system and be zeroed prior to use. :D
You haven't provided enough information. What's it used for? Is this an ISO 9001 (or some other standard) system? What's the risk if the thing isn't periodically calibrated?
 

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Jim, as usual, makes good points.

I'll just add that cost is irrelevant to a calibration program. Either the equipment should be calibrated or not. If (presuming Jim's criteria) quality decisions are made, then it likely should be. If it makes ense to purchase a new one rather than re-calibrate an out-of-calibration one, then consider that option.
 

Ron Rompen

Trusted Information Resource
#4
I agree with Yodon. Cost cannot be used as a factor when considering whether or not to perform calibration (although it may be considered, along with the potential for error and the results of that error) when determining the frequency of calibration.

Zeroing out any measuring instrument prior to use has no impact on whether or not the instrument measures accurately; that is the purpose of the calibration procedure.

If it sufficiently inexpensive, put it on a 1 yr (or whatever period is appropriate) replacement schedule, and be prepared to explain your rationale for this to your auditor.
 
A

adickerson

#5
If it is cheep it may have never have been calibrated, even by the factory. Just becasue it is new does not mean it is even close to accurate. I would test the device against known samples before I ever used it. You may not need to strictly "calibrate" it but a verification is defiantly in order.

Remember, things that are seen as cheep and disposable get the most abuse. I saw some on pry the top of a oil can with a digital caliper - that is precision machining!
 
A

AdamP

#6
To answer your question, you might consider how the refractometer is used. What decisions are made from the readings produced, and critical is the data? As already noted, even brand new, a unit could produce incorrect readings, so zeroing and calibration would make sense, but since it's just a tool, you really need to understand how and why you are using it and what you are doing with the results. That will tell you all you need.

Cheers,

Adam
 

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#7
Typically, the gage is used to determine concentrations, such as concentration of coolant in a machining center or soap in a washer. So, you can calibrate it by preparing standard concentration solutions and ensuring it reads the value correctly. If not, it will allow you to make incorrect decisions. Gage calibration minimalists will say that if it has no direct impact on final dimensions there is no need. If you have to rework a few skids of parts because the soap concentration on a wash was too little - or too much - then you get to learn the lesson the hard way. You might not notice on the coolant - until somebody realizes how much money they were wasting on prematurely worn tooling.
 
M

mecramur

#8
All, thank you for all the great information. I have been busy and just now checked the thread.

The refractometer is an inexpensive $130 hand held unit. It was purchased to check the concentratkion of water in oil used in a grinder. There is suppose to be 1 part DI water to 25 parts of oil. They are currently and have for some time been just mixng the fluid and not checking concetrations.

The instrument did not come with an RI for their specific chemistry but the tech did find a crosss reference chart for oil. The cross refernce syat the conctration of water is really 2% not 3.8%.

I questioned the cross reference accuracy and asked them to create a control sample, mixing 1cc of di water to 25 cc of cutting oil and then make several measurements with the new refractometer. This to me was a validation of the instrument and the readings and of the cross reference. This sample mixture could then be used to validate the instrument before each use.

What is the repeatability and accuracy of these hand held units?

Can these actually be calibrated or just verified?
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#9
All, thank you for all the great information. I have been busy and just now checked the thread.

The refractometer is an inexpensive $130 hand held unit. It was purchased to check the concentratkion of water in oil used in a grinder. There is suppose to be 1 part DI water to 25 parts of oil. They are currently and have for some time been just mixng the fluid and not checking concetrations.

The instrument did not come with an RI for their specific chemistry but the tech did find a crosss reference chart for oil. The cross refernce syat the conctration of water is really 2% not 3.8%.

I questioned the cross reference accuracy and asked them to create a control sample, mixing 1cc of di water to 25 cc of cutting oil and then make several measurements with the new refractometer. This to me was a validation of the instrument and the readings and of the cross reference. This sample mixture could then be used to validate the instrument before each use.

What is the repeatability and accuracy of these hand held units?

Can these actually be calibrated or just verified?
Checking the device against a control (a standard) is calibration. You can test the device for repeatability, reproducibility, etc. by performing the appropriate measurement system analysis.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Should low volume supplier PPM comparisons consider level of opportunity for error? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
P Should I purchase b89.1 1.10M? Acceptable low/high limits for gauging equipment? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
W Should we monitor all Significant part Characteristics with SPC? Low Volume CNC Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 15
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance standard to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A Should I take an online course for a career in Occupational Health and Safety? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
J Should a Class 1 medical device with an option to measure body weight be considered Class 1m? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
S What should i choose for "testing procedure" characteristics? (N95) General Information Resources 0
P Should eIFU link per ISO 15223-1:2016 be added to labels out of scope of Reg 207/2012? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Which Sampling Plan(s) Should I Use? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
S Which department should prepare the control plan? could you show me a standard regarding to this matter. FMEA and Control Plans 17
J Help settle a disagreement: Should external providers of preventive maintenance be on your ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
N Master Samples - What should we be keeping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
G Supplier delivered recent PPAP, should he deliver yearly layout inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
John Broomfield Vote - Should ISO9004 Become a Requirements Standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A Capability Study - in the beginning of your career what should you have known about the tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
J Should Loading and Unloading be Included in Cycle Times? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 14
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 26
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
H Should I mention machine/Equipment password In SOP? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
H Statistical Techniques Procedure - What should be included Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12

Similar threads

Top Bottom