Should a Training Matrix Be Approved Into the QMS?

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#1
I have a department manager who is developing a training matrix for his department and he asked me if it should be approved into the QMS.

My :2cents: is "no", since he will be using it as a tool and guide to determine the training needs of his people, and it will updated on an ongoing and frequent basis. He also asked if it would be acceptable to put a note in each of his people's training files stating that a matrix for his department exists and is maintained in his office, should an ISO auditor wish to see it.

I'm just curious to see what my fellow Covers say....Comments anyone?
:thanks:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

Duke Okes

#2
If by "approved" you mean should it be a controlled document, I would say no. However, it would be a quality record.
 
S

somerqc

#3
I personnally have all training matrices and also compentency matrices as part of the quality system.

Why? It made it VERY easy to show what people were trained in (signoffs, dates, etc.) as well as how we assess the effectiveness of the training and an individuals compentency level for a particular task.

Our auditors are VERY picky about how we train and how we determine when re-training is required. I can tell you that it made it MUCH easier to show the effectiveness of the system as a whole.

We were actually commended by the audit team on how our training program is structured and matured compared to other systems they see.
 

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
If by "approved" you mean should it be a controlled document, I would say no. However, it would be a quality record.
Yes, by "approved" I mean controlled document. And yes, I did tell the manager that it would become a quality record. :agree1:

Thanks, Duke!
 

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
We had the same situation here when an auditor was all but demanding a training matix.
We said "no".

The first reason is that the training records are kept as quality records and the auditor was able to find the training record he was searching for.
The second reason is that we maintain a training database that includes training dates and re-training required by dates where applicable. We maintained this database is, in fact, a training matrix. It's just not a controlled document but it is backed by the training records.

If you're not using a database to track training I'd recommed a matrix for easy reference. But I would control the form not necessarily the content as your training records should be enough.
 

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
We had the same situation here when an auditor was all but demanding a training matix.
We said "no".

The first reason is that the training records are kept as quality records and the auditor was able to find the training record he was searching for.
The second reason is that we maintain a training database that includes training dates and re-training required by dates where applicable. We maintained this database is, in fact, a training matrix. It's just not a controlled document but it is backed by the training records.

If you're not using a database to track training I'd recommed a matrix for easy reference. But I would control the form not necessarily the content as your training records should be enough.

This is similar to our situation. Thanks, Discordian! :thanx:
 
#7
Hi Gidget!
We have some interesting answers, as always - and I recently 'bumped' into a similar situation. Based on that experience, I'd say 'yes' the documentation, however it's used, should be part of the qms, approved and controlled - here's why: -

It's not a case of whether ISO says so, or an auditor demands it. It's more important to look at this in terms of a value added process of the organization. If a manager is using a tool to identify training needs, planning to fulfill those training actions (so identified) and keep records of training completed, then that is value-added.

If those documents are not formally part of the business management (read quality) system, then they have little chance of being sustained, regardless of who is in the management 'chair'.

Countless times, a manager has developed an informal, but effective system, only to move on. The next manager then may create or develop 'their' system.

My experience was with a (truly awful) manager who wanted to change everything, simply because she 'didn't like it'. Her staff all went through performance evaluations, which where done on 'unapproved' forms. Now they have to be done over, since the 'approved method' wasn't used and she's moved on (fired, as it turns out!!). All the evals were done to the wrong criteria on the wrong form.

This type of thing is causing huge costs all around.

The processes, tools and forms etc., should be part of the qms to allow controls over these situations and to stop 'churn, cost and confusion.
O.K so it may not be a huge volumes of wasted effort, but hey, we all complain about being 'lean' and having too much to do, so it has to stop somewhere.

Andy
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
training matrix format and 'rules of use' are in our QMS as controlled forms/work instructions. We do have stringent rules around how many people must be trained to mainatin proper staff levels and we color code the actuals vs required staff levels.
Red means not enough people trained to maintain daily capacity / takt time.
Yellow means enough people trained including vacation levels and past absenteeism to ensure meeting takt time. (yellow because any excursion above the average attendance rate will result in not enough coverage). Green is enough to cover all but a catastrophic event (ice storm, flu epidemic...) and suprisingly this doesnt' yield to too many people trained!

The filled out matrix is NOT a quality record. it is used as a daily tool for the managers and supervisors.

We DO have separate training records that are signed and filed in the indiviual's file. Teh training record is a form under doc control and for many operations is part of teh work instruction since we have qualification and test requirements documented on the form or WI....
 
J

JaneB

#9
We do have stringent rules around how many people must be trained to mainatin proper staff levels and we color code the actuals vs required staff levels.
Red means not enough people trained to maintain daily capacity / takt time.
Yellow means enough people trained including vacation levels and past absenteeism to ensure meeting takt time. (yellow because any excursion above the average attendance rate will result in not enough coverage). Green is enough to cover all but a catastrophic event (ice storm, flu epidemic...) and suprisingly this doesnt' yield to too many people trained!
Great idea - I'm a strong fan of colour coding, which really makes things simple & is well received by management. I use them in audit reports, but hadn't thought of applying them in this way. Thanks. I seem to be missing something though - what is 'takt' time?
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
takt time = the customer demand rate.
required number of shipments (orders) in a given time period / the number of available work time in the same period. Usually expressed as 1 unit every XX minutes...
this enables a line to know how much time each individual operation should take for each unit.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
S Should Training Service providers be included in AVL? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
J Manufacturing Safety Wire Training and Certification - Who should train Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
M What training or certificate should I take to work in Quality? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
F What Training should a Quality Manager have? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 32
V Who should sign the Certificate of Attendance for In-House Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 7
B Who should create training associated with changes to the procedures? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
S What should be included in training documentation Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 19
C Documentation of training and retraining procedures, specifically how training should Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
S Internal Auditor Training - How often should an internal auditor be trained? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 15
Y To what extend should training materials be controlled? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 27
L Training - How much should employees be taught? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 9
B What training/certificates should NEW quality people seek? Career and Occupation Discussions 19
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance standard to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A Should I take an online course for a career in Occupational Health and Safety? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
J Should a Class 1 medical device with an option to measure body weight be considered Class 1m? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
S What should i choose for "testing procedure" characteristics? (N95) General Information Resources 0
P Should eIFU link per ISO 15223-1:2016 be added to labels out of scope of Reg 207/2012? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Which Sampling Plan(s) Should I Use? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
S Which department should prepare the control plan? could you show me a standard regarding to this matter. FMEA and Control Plans 17
J Help settle a disagreement: Should external providers of preventive maintenance be on your ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
N Master Samples - What should we be keeping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
G Supplier delivered recent PPAP, should he deliver yearly layout inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
John Broomfield Vote - Should ISO9004 Become a Requirements Standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A Capability Study - in the beginning of your career what should you have known about the tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
J Should Loading and Unloading be Included in Cycle Times? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 14
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom