Should corrected audit findings be presented ??



An auditee has corrected a finding during the audit before the closign meeting and should the auditor report and present the finding in the closing meeting?As per Allan Sayle in his "Management Audit" book, all finding should not be presented and reported in the Closing meeting and as per ASQC's text,it mentioned that it should be reported and presented in the Closing Meeting as it is the product of the audit and should give a true reflection of the audit.
It is pretty confusing for those auditors where consistency does not come into the picture!!

Any recommendation/input/qns/comments welcome.

Elsmar Forum Sponsor


Well, in my company, during the Internal Quality Audit, when the noncompliance was corrected on site, there's no need to present this on the closing meeting, the only thing that we presented are the noncompliance that were not be able to correct during the audit of a particular group in a scheduled time. The auditee may have corrected it after the period of the audit of his group but still it would be raised as noncompliance and need to be presented on the closing meeting.


Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
In my opinion, not reporting findings is a buy off. It is bad business. It is nothing less than hiding problem(s). I have heard the old "We fixed the problem..." many times - but let's face it - If you don't report it/record it, then there is no follow up to know if that 'immediate, on the spot' fix even works. No follow-up. If a problem is fixed, it (in my opinion) means nothihng if the 'fix' isn't validated/verified as effective. To me this is nothing less than saying: "I won't do it again! Promise!"

Not reporting findings? An easy way out for violators. And what about history? The same problem at every audit is not identified as recurrent. Every time it's the same, tired response: "We fixed it". If not recorded and reported it can happen every audit and thus be a continuous problem while no one knows it.

IMHO - a very, very bad idea.


Agree with Mr. Smith. I always present all findings,including those that have been corrected during the course of the audit.

The reason is that in the auditee's haste to "close" the finding before the outbriefing, they often overlook the true root cause. As a result the corrective action is more along the line of stopping the bleeding than preventing recurrence. And the opportunity for preventive action is entirely overlooked.

Russ Jackson

Auditing normally allows only a sampling of the sub-processes and documents in a quality system. Therefore, findings that are corrected either on the spot or verifed later by the auditor should be reported in the closing meeting and documented. This allows the auditee to determine the effectiveness of the CA and assess the extent to which the type finding is occuring within the quality system. In the closing the auditor should report the finding and identify the need for followup action by the auditees.

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
an auditor is under no obligation to veer from the audit and back track to review a corrective action. If the finding is corrected in his presence immediately (an opps that typically will need no further CA?), then note in the audit trail accordingly......and move on. Do you report at the end? Depends, was it a real "one off" oops....probably not. Does it appear to be a weakspot symptom? yes....All this is a comfort level thing with the auditor. I will take any formal CA submitted, and put aside "to review if time permits" But seldom does time permit until after the closing meeting....if at all. This too depends on the finding, and the severity. Some stuff is clerical....
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
E Should a corrected finding be reported & presented ??? Registrars and Notified Bodies 5
W Strategy for determining which components from a system should be "ME EQUIPMENT" -- home healthcare environment IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
B Documented information - Should be controlled? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Q Is engineering a process and should it have its own process turtle? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
P Which MDCG Document should I use for PMS Plan and PSUR? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Who should quality representative report to? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
H When should the first PSUR be issued? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
I If i do not want to be an initial importer should i register with FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
O Should a Covid vaccine and testing policy be included as part of ISO9001 or AS9100 risk management? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
B UKRP to what level should you audit Class I Technical Documentation? UK Medical Device Regulations 0
C When should you quit programming? Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 9
C Should resolution be included in uncertainty budget for digital caliper or micrometer calibration? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 5
Ed Panek External Standards List - Should this document include previously revised standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T How should I approach REACH, CM, etc. as a job shop? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 18
A Should we assign the PRRC before the date of application of MDR (26 May 2021)? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J UDI-DI how should we interpret Device version or model to determine if a new UDI-DI is needed? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
A Should I take an online course for a career in Occupational Health and Safety? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
J Should a Class 1 medical device with an option to measure body weight be considered Class 1m? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
S What should i choose for "testing procedure" characteristics? (N95) General Information Resources 0
P Should eIFU link per ISO 15223-1:2016 be added to labels out of scope of Reg 207/2012? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Which Sampling Plan(s) Should I Use? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 13
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
S Which department should prepare the control plan? could you show me a standard regarding to this matter. FMEA and Control Plans 17
J Help settle a disagreement: Should external providers of preventive maintenance be on your ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
N Master Samples - What should we be keeping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
G Supplier delivered recent PPAP, should he deliver yearly layout inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
John Broomfield Vote - Should ISO9004 Become a Requirements Standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A Capability Study - in the beginning of your career what should you have known about the tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
J Should Loading and Unloading be Included in Cycle Times? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 14
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom